Suppr超能文献

二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂与α-糖苷酶抑制剂治疗2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制疗效、血脂谱及β细胞功能比较:一项荟萃分析

Comparisons of the efficacy of glucose control, lipid profile, and β-cell function between DPP-4 inhibitors and AGI treatment in type 2 diabetes patients: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Cai Xiaoling, Yang Wenjia, Zhou Lingli, Zhang Simin, Han Xueyao, Ji Linong

机构信息

Endocrine and Metabolism Department, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.

出版信息

Endocrine. 2015 Dec;50(3):590-7. doi: 10.1007/s12020-015-0653-3. Epub 2015 Jun 6.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor treatment with α-glucosidase inhibitor (AGI) treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes through a meta-analysis. Studies were identified by a literature search of Medline, Embase, and others from the time that recording commenced until December 2014. The meta-analysis was performed by computing the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) for a change from baseline to the study endpoint for DPP-4 inhibitors versus AGIs. Nine randomized controlled trial were judged to be appropriate for inclusion in the meta-analysis. One thousand and forty-six patients were treated with a DPP-4 inhibitor, while 929 patients were treated with AGI treatment; the groups had a comparable baseline body mass index of 25.5 ± 1.3 kg/m(2) and mean baseline HbA1c of 7.83 ± 0.53 %. Treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors led to a significantly greater change from baseline in the HbA1c levels (WMD -0.30 %; 95 % CI -0.47 to -0.13 %, p < 0.001) and fasting plasma glucose levels (WMD -0.50 mmol/L; 95 % CI -0.89 to -0.11 mmol/L, p = 0.01) compared with AGI treatment. Compared with AGIs, treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors was associated with a significantly greater increase in the weight change from baseline (WMD 0.89 kg; 95 % CI 0.53-1.25, p < 0.001). Treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors was associated with a significantly greater increase in the fasting insulin level from baseline (WMD 0.63 µU/mL; 95 % CI 0.35-0.90 µU/mL, p < 0.001). DPP-4 inhibitors significantly improved homeostatic model assessment for β-cell function in type 2 diabetes patients compared with AGI treatment (WMD 5.43; 95 % CI 1.01-9.85, p = 0.02). DPP-4 inhibitors were associated with a significantly greater decrease in the cholesterol (CHO) level (WMD -0.19 mmol/L; 95 % CI -0.19 to -0.19 mmol/L, p < 0.001) and a significantly greater decrease in the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level (WMD -0.16 mmol/L; 95 % CI -0.26 to -0.05 mmol/L, p = 0.003). Compared with AGIs (813 participants), treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors (1031 participants) was associated with a significantly lower incidence of drug-related adverse event (OR 0.48; 95 % CI 0.36-0.64, p < 0.0001). The efficacy of glucose control and improvement of β-cell function, as well as total CHO and LDL-C decreases, in DPP-4 inhibitor treatment were superior to those with AGI treatment, and there was a lower incidence of drug-related AE.

摘要

本研究旨在通过荟萃分析比较二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂与α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂(AGI)治疗2型糖尿病患者的疗效。通过检索Medline、Embase等数据库,从记录开始至2014年12月进行文献检索以确定研究。通过计算DPP-4抑制剂与AGI从基线到研究终点变化的加权平均差(WMD)和95%置信区间(CI)进行荟萃分析。九项随机对照试验被判定适合纳入荟萃分析。1046例患者接受DPP-4抑制剂治疗,而929例患者接受AGI治疗;两组基线体重指数相当,为25.5±1.3kg/m²,平均基线糖化血红蛋白为7.83±0.53%。与AGI治疗相比,DPP-4抑制剂治疗导致糖化血红蛋白水平从基线的变化显著更大(WMD -0.30%;95%CI -0.47至-0.13%,p<0.001)以及空腹血糖水平变化显著更大(WMD -0.50mmol/L;95%CI -0.89至-0.11mmol/L,p = 0.01)。与AGI相比,DPP-4抑制剂治疗与基线体重变化显著更大的增加相关(WMD 0.89kg;95%CI 0.53 - 1.25,p<0.001)。DPP-4抑制剂治疗与空腹胰岛素水平从基线的显著更大增加相关(WMD 0.63µU/mL;95%CI 0.35 - 0.90µU/mL,p<0.001)。与AGI治疗相比,DPP-4抑制剂显著改善了2型糖尿病患者β细胞功能的稳态模型评估(WMD 5.43;95%CI 1.01 - 9.85,p = 0.02)。DPP-4抑制剂与胆固醇(CHO)水平显著更大的降低相关(WMD -0.19mmol/L;95%CI -0.19至-0.19mmol/L,p<0.001)以及与低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平显著更大的降低相关(WMD -0.16mmol/L;95%CI -0.26至-0.05mmol/L,p = 0.003)。与AGI(813名参与者)相比,DPP-4抑制剂治疗(1031名参与者)与药物相关不良事件的发生率显著更低相关(OR 0.48;95%CI 0.36 - 0.64,p<0.0001)。DPP-4抑制剂治疗在血糖控制、β细胞功能改善以及总CHO和LDL-C降低方面的疗效优于AGI治疗,且药物相关不良事件的发生率更低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验