From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland (B.S.K., L.A.R., S.P.D., R.J.T.); and Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland (E.C.K.).
Radiology. 2016 Jul;280(1):252-60. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016150409. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
Purpose To investigate the development of chest radiograph interpretation skill through medical training by measuring both diagnostic accuracy and eye movements during visual search. Materials and Methods An institutional exemption from full ethical review was granted for the study. Five consultant radiologists were deemed the reference expert group, and four radiology registrars, five senior house officers (SHOs), and six interns formed four clinician groups. Participants were shown 30 chest radiographs, 14 of which had a pneumothorax, and were asked to give their level of confidence as to whether a pneumothorax was present. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was carried out on diagnostic decisions. Eye movements were recorded with a Tobii TX300 (Tobii Technology, Stockholm, Sweden) eye tracker. Four eye-tracking metrics were analyzed. Variables were compared to identify any differences between groups. All data were compared by using the Friedman nonparametric method. Results The average area under the ROC curve for the groups increased with experience (0.947 for consultants, 0.792 for registrars, 0.693 for SHOs, and 0.659 for interns; P = .009). A significant difference in diagnostic accuracy was found between consultants and registrars (P = .046). All four eye-tracking metrics decreased with experience, and there were significant differences between registrars and SHOs. Total reading time decreased with experience; it was significantly lower for registrars compared with SHOs (P = .046) and for SHOs compared with interns (P = .025). Conclusion Chest radiograph interpretation skill increased with experience, both in terms of diagnostic accuracy and visual search. The observed level of experience at which there was a significant difference was higher for diagnostic accuracy than for eye-tracking metrics. (©) RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
目的 通过测量视觉搜索过程中的诊断准确性和眼动,研究医学培训对胸片解读技能的发展作用。
材料与方法 该研究获得机构伦理审查豁免。5 位顾问放射科医师被认为是参考专家组,4 位放射科住院医师、5 位高级住院医师和 6 位实习医生组成 4 个临床医生组。参与者观看了 30 张胸片,其中 14 张有气胸,并被要求对是否存在气胸给出自己的置信度。对诊断决策进行了接收者操作特性(ROC)曲线分析。使用 Tobii TX300(Tobii Technology,斯德哥尔摩,瑞典)眼动追踪器记录眼动。分析了 4 个眼动追踪指标。比较了变量,以确定组间的差异。所有数据均通过 Friedman 非参数法进行比较。
结果 随着经验的增加,组的 ROC 曲线下平均面积增加(顾问为 0.947,住院医师为 0.792,高级住院医师为 0.693,实习医生为 0.659;P =.009)。顾问和住院医师之间的诊断准确性存在显著差异(P =.046)。所有 4 个眼动追踪指标都随经验而降低,且住院医师和高级住院医师之间存在显著差异。阅读总时间随经验减少;住院医师明显短于高级住院医师(P =.046),高级住院医师明显短于实习医生(P =.025)。
结论 无论是在诊断准确性还是在视觉搜索方面,胸片解读技能都随经验的增加而提高。观察到的存在显著差异的经验水平在诊断准确性方面比眼动追踪指标更高。(©)RSNA,2016 在线补充材料可从本文获得。