Suppr超能文献

亚洲医师接受 AIR Pneumo 认证考试时,对尘肺 X 射线分类的观察者间一致性和准确性。

Inter-observer agreement and accuracy in classifying radiographs for pneumoconiosis among Asian physicians taking AIR Pneumo certification examination.

机构信息

Department of Environmental Medicine, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Japan.

Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Persahabatan Hospital, Indonesia.

出版信息

Ind Health. 2022 Oct 1;60(5):459-469. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2021-0210. Epub 2021 Nov 23.

Abstract

This study examined inter-observer agreement and diagnostic accuracy in classifying radiographs for pneumoconiosis among Asian physicians taking the AIR Pneumo examination. We compared agreement and diagnostic accuracy for parenchymal and pleural lesions across residing countries, specialty training, and work experience using data on 93 physicians. Physicians demonstrated fair to good agreement with kappa values 0.30 (95% CI: 0.20-0.40), 0.29 (95% CI: 0.23-0.36), 0.59 (95% CI: 0.52-0.67), and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.55-0.74) in classifying pleural plaques, small opacity shapes, small opacity profusion, and large opacities, respectively. Kappa values among Asian countries ranging from 0.25 to 0.55 (pleural plaques), 0.47 to 0.73 (small opacity profusion), and 0.55 to 0.69 (large opacity size). The median Youden's J index (interquartile range) for classifying pleural plaque, small opacity, and large opacity was 61.1 (25.5), 76.8 (29.3), and 88.9 (23.3), respectively. Radiologists and recent graduates showed superior performance than other groups regarding agreement and accuracy in classifying all types of lesions. In conclusion, Asian physicians taking the AIR Pneumo examination were better at classifying parenchymal lesions than pleural plaques using the ILO classification. The degree of agreement and accuracy was different among countries and was associated with background specialty training.

摘要

本研究考察了亚洲医师在参加 AIR Pneumo 考试时对尘肺放射影像进行分类的观察者间一致性和诊断准确性。我们比较了来自 93 名医师的数据,以居住地、专业培训和工作经验为基础,比较了肺实质和胸膜病变的一致性和诊断准确性。医师在分类胸膜斑、小阴影形态、小阴影密集度和大阴影时,其一致性表现为中等至良好,kappa 值分别为 0.30(95%CI:0.20-0.40)、0.29(95%CI:0.23-0.36)、0.59(95%CI:0.52-0.67)和 0.65(95%CI:0.55-0.74)。亚洲国家的 kappa 值范围为 0.25 至 0.55(胸膜斑)、0.47 至 0.73(小阴影密集度)和 0.55 至 0.69(大阴影大小)。分类胸膜斑、小阴影和大阴影的中位数 Youden's J 指数(四分位距)分别为 61.1(25.5)、76.8(29.3)和 88.9(23.3)。在分类所有类型病变的一致性和准确性方面,放射科医师和应届毕业生的表现优于其他群体。总之,参加 AIR Pneumo 考试的亚洲医师使用 ILO 分类法对肺实质病变的分类优于胸膜斑。一致性和准确性的程度在国家之间存在差异,并且与专业培训背景有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efd0/9539454/7bdeb1cd518c/indhealth-60-459-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验