Franklin Clifford A, White Letitia J, Franklin Thomas C, Livengood Lindsay G
Audiology and Speech Pathology Department, The University of Arkansas at Little Rock, The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
Missouri State University, Springfield, MO, USA.
Percept Mot Skills. 2016 Aug;123(1):109-20. doi: 10.1177/0031512516655367. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
The present study was a follow-up investigation to a previous study exploring the relationship between listeners' loudness tolerance and listeners' acceptable noise level among normally hearing adults. The present study compared the same two measures, but data were obtained from listeners with hearing loss; 12 adults with sensorineural hearing loss participated in a loudness tolerance measure using a scaling technique initially established for setting hearing aid output limits, in addition to an acceptable noise level measure. The acceptable noise level procedure used in this study quantified the listeners' acceptance of background noise while listening to speech. As with the research involving listeners with normal hearing, the Pearson correlation procedure indicated a lack of any statistically significant correlation between the two measures.
本研究是对先前一项研究的后续调查,先前研究探讨了听力正常的成年人中听众响度耐受性与听众可接受噪声水平之间的关系。本研究比较了相同的两项测量指标,但数据是从听力损失患者中获得的;12名感音神经性听力损失的成年人参与了一项响度耐受性测量,该测量使用了最初为设定助听器输出限制而建立的标度技术,此外还进行了一项可接受噪声水平测量。本研究中使用的可接受噪声水平程序量化了听众在听语音时对背景噪声的接受程度。与涉及听力正常听众的研究一样,皮尔逊相关程序表明这两项测量指标之间不存在任何具有统计学意义的相关性。