• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用个人听力设备时声音偏好对响度耐受性和偏好聆听水平的影响。

Effect of Sound Preference on Loudness Tolerance and Preferred Listening Levels Using Personal Listening Devices.

作者信息

Serpanos Yula C, DiBlasi Thomas, Butler Jasmin

机构信息

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Adelphi University, Hy Weinberg Center, 158 Cambridge Avenue, Room 122, Garden City, NY 11530, USA.

New York Doctor of Audiology (AuD) Consortium, Garden City, NY 11530, USA.

出版信息

Audiol Res. 2025 Jun 11;15(3):68. doi: 10.3390/audiolres15030068.

DOI:10.3390/audiolres15030068
PMID:40558407
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12190042/
Abstract

This study examined the effect of sound preference on loudness tolerance (LTLs) and preferred listening levels (PLLs) using personal listening devices (PLDs). The implication of this relationship on hearing health promotion counseling and practices using PLDs is discussed. Participants were 50 individuals, aged 21 to 90 years, with normal hearing or hearing loss. Listeners rated several sound samples (i.e., music, running speech, and machinery noise) played through a PLD using earphones according to their sound preference (i.e., enjoyable, acceptable, and unpleasant) and then self-adjusted the volume setting to their LTL and PLL for a sound sample in each sound preference category. Most listeners judged music (70%) as , running speech (54%) as , and machinery noise (84%) as No significant differences were found in LTLs according to sound preference, but PLLs for enjoyable sounds occurred at significantly higher levels compared with those deemed acceptable or unpleasant. Listeners using PLDs perceived LTLs and PLLs differently according to their sound preferences. PLLs occurred at significantly higher volumes for sounds deemed enjoyable when using PLDs. The implication is that hearing health counseling should include information to PLD users on the potential of altered loudness perception with enjoyable sounds, which may lead to higher and riskier PLD listening levels.

摘要

本研究使用个人听力设备(PLD),考察了声音偏好对响度容忍度(LTLs)和偏好聆听水平(PLLs)的影响。并讨论了这种关系对使用PLD进行听力健康促进咨询和实践的意义。研究参与者为50名年龄在21至90岁之间、听力正常或有听力损失的个体。听众根据声音偏好(即愉悦、可接受和不愉悦),对通过耳机经PLD播放的几个声音样本(即音乐、连续语音和机器噪音)进行评分,然后针对每个声音偏好类别中的一个声音样本,自行将音量设置调整到其LTL和PLL。大多数听众认为音乐(70%)是愉悦的,连续语音(54%)是可接受的,机器噪音(84%)是不愉悦的。根据声音偏好,LTLs未发现显著差异,但与那些被认为可接受或不愉悦的声音相比,愉悦声音的PLLs出现的水平显著更高。使用PLD的听众根据其声音偏好对LTLs和PLLs的感知有所不同。使用PLD时,对于被认为愉悦的声音,PLLs出现在显著更高的音量水平。这意味着听力健康咨询应向PLD用户提供信息,告知他们愉悦声音可能会改变响度感知,这可能导致更高且更有风险的PLD聆听水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0539/12190042/6d8d608aa737/audiolres-15-00068-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0539/12190042/bd6be7ea7e81/audiolres-15-00068-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0539/12190042/6d8d608aa737/audiolres-15-00068-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0539/12190042/bd6be7ea7e81/audiolres-15-00068-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0539/12190042/6d8d608aa737/audiolres-15-00068-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Sound Preference on Loudness Tolerance and Preferred Listening Levels Using Personal Listening Devices.使用个人听力设备时声音偏好对响度耐受性和偏好聆听水平的影响。
Audiol Res. 2025 Jun 11;15(3):68. doi: 10.3390/audiolres15030068.
2
WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Permanent Hearing Loss and Tinnitus.世界卫生组织欧洲区域环境噪声指南:关于环境噪声与永久性听力损失及耳鸣的系统评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Sep 27;14(10):1139. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101139.
3
Daily music exposure dose and hearing problems using personal listening devices in adolescents and young adults: A systematic review.青少年和青年使用个人收听设备时的每日音乐暴露剂量与听力问题:一项系统综述。
Int J Audiol. 2016;55(4):197-205. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1122237. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
4
Ginkgo biloba for tinnitus.银杏叶治疗耳鸣。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 16;11(11):CD013514. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013514.pub2.
5
Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss.预防职业性噪声性听力损失的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 7;7(7):CD006396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006396.pub4.
6
Antibiotics for otitis media with effusion (OME) in children.儿童分泌性中耳炎(OME)的抗生素治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 23;10(10):CD015254. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015254.pub2.
7
Interventions to improve hearing aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation.改善成人听觉康复中助听器使用情况的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 18;2016(8):CD010342. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010342.pub3.
8
Hearing Instruments for Unilateral Severe-to-Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.成人单侧重度至极重度感音神经性听力损失的听力仪器:系统评价与荟萃分析
Ear Hear. 2016 Sep-Oct;37(5):495-507. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000313.
9
Ventilation tubes (grommets) for otitis media with effusion (OME) in children.鼓膜置管(通气管)用于儿童分泌性中耳炎(OME)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 15;11(11):CD015215. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015215.pub2.
10
Bilateral versus unilateral hearing aids for bilateral hearing impairment in adults.成人双侧听力障碍使用双侧助听器与单侧助听器的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 19;12(12):CD012665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012665.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence in Audiology: A Scoping Review of Current Applications and Future Directions.人工智能在听力学中的应用:现状与未来方向的范围综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Nov 6;24(22):7126. doi: 10.3390/s24227126.
2
Prevalence and global estimates of unsafe listening practices in adolescents and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.青少年和青年人群中不安全用耳行为的流行率和全球估计:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Nov;7(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010501.
3
What do hearing healthcare professionals do to promote hearing aid use and benefit among adults? A systematic review.
听力保健专业人员如何促进成人助听器的使用和受益?系统评价。
Int J Audiol. 2019 Feb;58(2):63-76. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1531154. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
4
Hearing loss and quality of life.听力损失与生活质量。
J Commun Disord. 2019 Mar-Apr;78:33-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
5
Early Indication of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Young Adult Users of Personal Listening Devices.个人听力设备年轻成年使用者中噪声性听力损失的早期迹象。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2018 Oct;127(10):703-709. doi: 10.1177/0003489418790284. Epub 2018 Jul 28.
6
Sound pressure levels generated at risk volume steps of portable listening devices: types of smartphone and genres of music.在便携听力设备的风险音量档产生的声压级:智能手机类型和音乐类型。
BMC Public Health. 2018 May 1;18(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5399-4.
7
Understanding Why People Enjoy Loud Sound.理解人们为何喜欢响亮的声音。
Semin Hear. 2017 Nov;38(4):348-358. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606328. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
8
Influence of Hearing Risk Information on the Motivation and Modification of Personal Listening Device Use.听力风险信息对个人听力设备使用动机及调整的影响
Am J Audiol. 2016 Dec 1;25(4):332-343. doi: 10.1044/2016_AJA-15-0062.
9
Subjective Reports of Trouble Tolerating Sound in Daily Life versus Loudness Discomfort Levels.日常生活中对声音耐受困难的主观报告与响度不适水平
Am J Audiol. 2016 Dec 1;25(4):359-363. doi: 10.1044/2016_AJA-15-0034.
10
Music-induced Hearing Loss in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.儿童、青少年和青年成人的音乐性听力损失:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Oct;37(9):1208-16. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001163.