Carney Robert M, Freedland Kenneth E, Steinmeyer Brian C, Rubin Eugene H, Ewald Gregory
Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Sep 15;219:164-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.045. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
Depression is a risk factor for morbidity and mortality in patients with coronary heart disease. Finding effective methods for identifying and treating depression in these patients is a high priority. The purpose of this study was to determine whether collaborative care (CC) for patients who screen positive for depression during an outpatient cardiology visit results in greater improvement in depression symptoms and better medical outcomes than seen in patients who screen positive for depression but receive only usual care (UC).
Two hundred-one patients seen in an outpatient cardiology clinic who screened positive for depression during an outpatient visit were randomized to receive either CC or UC. Recommendations for depression treatment and ongoing support and monitoring of depression symptoms were provided to CC patients and their primary care physicians (PCPs) for up to 6months.
There were no differences between the arms in mean Beck Depression Inventory-II scores(CC, 15.9; UC, 17.4; p=.45) or in depression remission rates(CC, 32.5%; UC, 26.2%; p=0.34) after 6months, or in the number of hospitalizations after 12months (p=0.73). There were fewer deaths among the CC (1/100) than UC patients (8/101) (p=0.03).
This trial did not show that CC produces better depression outcomes than UC. Screening led to a higher rate of depression treatment than was expected in the UC group, and delays in obtaining depression treatment from PCPs may have reduced treatment effectiveness for the CC patients. A different strategy for depression treatment following screening in outpatient cardiology services is needed.
抑郁症是冠心病患者发病和死亡的危险因素。找到识别和治疗这些患者抑郁症的有效方法是当务之急。本研究的目的是确定门诊心脏病就诊时抑郁症筛查呈阳性的患者接受协作护理(CC)是否比抑郁症筛查呈阳性但仅接受常规护理(UC)的患者在抑郁症状改善和医疗结局方面有更大改善。
201名在门诊心脏病诊所就诊且门诊就诊时抑郁症筛查呈阳性的患者被随机分为接受CC或UC。向CC患者及其初级保健医生(PCP)提供抑郁症治疗建议以及对抑郁症状的持续支持和监测,为期6个月。
6个月后,两组在贝克抑郁量表-II平均得分(CC组为15.9;UC组为17.4;p = 0.45)、抑郁缓解率(CC组为32.5%;UC组为26.2%;p = 0.34)或12个月后的住院次数(p = 0.73)方面均无差异。CC组(1/100)的死亡人数少于UC组患者(8/101)(p = 0.03)。
该试验未表明CC比UC能产生更好的抑郁治疗效果。筛查导致UC组的抑郁症治疗率高于预期,而从PCP处获得抑郁症治疗的延迟可能降低了CC组患者的治疗效果。门诊心脏病服务筛查后需要一种不同的抑郁症治疗策略。