Suppr超能文献

持续心脏再同步治疗对左心室辅助装置植入术后室性心律失常的影响。

Effect of Continued Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Ventricular Arrhythmias After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

作者信息

Schleifer John William, Mookadam Farouk, Kransdorf Evan P, Nanda Udai, Adams Jonathon C, Cha Stephen, Pajaro Octavio E, Steidley David Eric, Scott Robert L, Carvajal Tomas, Saadiq Rayya A, Srivathsan Komandoor

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2016 Aug 15;118(4):556-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.05.050. Epub 2016 May 28.

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces ventricular arrhythmia (VA) burden in some patients with heart failure, but its effect after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is unknown. We compared VA burden in patients with CRT devices in situ who underwent LVAD implantation and continued CRT (n = 39) to those who had CRT turned off before discharge (n = 26). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks were significantly reduced in patients with continued CRT (1.5 ± 2.7 shocks per patient vs 5.5 ± 9.3 with CRT off, p = 0.014). There was a nonsignificant reduction in cumulative VA episodes per patient with CRT continued at discharge (42 ± 105 VA per patient vs 82 ± 198 with CRT off, p = 0.29). On-treatment analysis by whether CRT was on or off identified a significantly lower burden of VA (17 ± 1 per patient-year CRT on vs 37 ± 1 per patient-year CRT off, p <0.0001) and ICD shocks (1.2 ± 0.3 per patient-year CRT on vs 1.7 ± 0.3 per patient-year CRT off, p = 0.018). In conclusion, continued CRT is associated with significantly reduced ICD shocks and VA burden after LVAD implantation.

摘要

心脏再同步治疗(CRT)可减轻部分心力衰竭患者的室性心律失常(VA)负担,但其在植入左心室辅助装置(LVAD)后的效果尚不清楚。我们比较了植入LVAD且继续接受CRT治疗的原位CRT装置患者(n = 39)与出院前关闭CRT的患者(n = 26)的VA负担。继续接受CRT治疗的患者植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)电击次数显著减少(每位患者1.5±2.7次电击,而关闭CRT时为5.5±9.3次,p = 0.014)。出院时继续接受CRT治疗的每位患者累积VA发作次数有非显著性减少(每位患者42±105次VA,而关闭CRT时为82±198次,p = 0.29)。根据CRT开启或关闭进行的治疗分析显示,VA负担(CRT开启时每位患者每年17±1次,而CRT关闭时为37±1次,p<0.0001)和ICD电击次数(CRT开启时每位患者每年1.2±0.3次,而CRT关闭时为1.7±0.3次,p = 0.018)显著降低。总之,继续进行CRT与LVAD植入后ICD电击次数和VA负担显著降低相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验