Department of Medicine Medical University of South Carolina Charleston SC.
Division of CardiologyDepartment of MedicineRalph H. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center Charleston SC.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Mar 16;10(6):e018127. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018127. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
Background The hemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are uncharacterized. We aimed to quantify the hemodynamic effects of different ventricular pacing configurations in patients with LVADs, focusing on short-term changes in load-independent right ventricular (RV) contractility. Methods and Results Patients with LVADs underwent right heart catheterization during spontaneous respiration without sedation and with pressures recorded at end expiration. Right heart catheterization was performed at different pacemaker configurations (biventricular pacing, left ventricular pacing, RV pacing, and unpaced conduction) in a randomly generated sequence with >3 minutes between configuration change and hemodynamic assessment. The right heart catheterization operator was blinded to the sequence. RV maximal change in pressure over time normalized to instantaneous pressure was calculated from digitized hemodynamic waveforms, consistent with a previously validated protocol. Fifteen patients with LVADs who were in sinus rhythm were included. Load-independent RV contractility, as assessed by RV maximal change in pressure over time normalized to instantaneous pressure, was higher in biventricular pacing compared with unpaced conduction (15.7±7.6 versus 11.0±4.0 s; =0.003). Thermodilution cardiac output was higher in biventricular pacing compared with unpaced conduction (4.48±0.7 versus 4.38±0.8 L/min; =0.05). There were no significant differences in heart rate, ventricular filling pressures, or atrioventricular valvular regurgitation across all pacing configurations. Conclusions Biventricular pacing acutely improves load-independent RV contractility in patients with LVADs. Even in these patients with mechanical left ventricular unloading via LVAD who were relative pacing nonresponders (required LVAD support despite cardiac resynchronization therapy), biventricular pacing was acutely beneficial to RV contractility.
心脏再同步治疗(CRT)对左心室辅助装置(LVAD)患者的血流动力学影响尚不清楚。我们旨在量化 LVAD 患者不同心室起搏配置的血流动力学效应,重点关注负荷独立的右心室(RV)收缩力的短期变化。
LVAD 患者在无镇静的自主呼吸下接受右心导管检查,并在呼气末记录压力。在不同的起搏器配置(双心室起搏、左心室起搏、RV 起搏和无起搏传导)之间以随机生成的顺序进行右心导管检查,在配置更改和血流动力学评估之间至少有 3 分钟的时间间隔。右心导管检查医师对序列是盲的。从数字化的血流动力学波形计算 RV 压力随时间的最大变化与即时压力的比值,这与以前验证的方案一致。共纳入 15 例窦性节律的 LVAD 患者。用 RV 压力随时间的最大变化与即时压力的比值评估负荷独立的 RV 收缩力,双心室起搏时高于无起搏传导(15.7±7.6 比 11.0±4.0 s;=0.003)。双心室起搏时比无起搏传导时热稀释心输出量更高(4.48±0.7 比 4.38±0.8 L/min;=0.05)。在所有起搏配置下,心率、心室充盈压或房室瓣反流均无显著差异。
急性双心室起搏可改善 LVAD 患者的负荷独立 RV 收缩力。即使在这些通过 LVAD 进行机械性左心室卸载的患者中(尽管接受 CRT,但仍需要 LVAD 支持),双心室起搏对 RV 收缩力也有急性益处。