Vance Jona, Stokes Dustin
Department of Philosophy, Northern Arizona University, USA.
Department of Philosophy, University of Utah, USA.
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Jan;47:86-98. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
This paper concerns how extant theorists of predictive coding conceptualize and explain possible instances of cognitive penetration. Section 1 offers brief clarification of the predictive coding framework and of cognitive penetration. Section 2 develops more precise ways that the predictive coding framework can explain genuine top-down causal effects on perceptual experience. Section 3 develops these insights further with an eye towards tracking one extant criterion for cognitive penetration, namely, that the relevant cognitive effects on perception must be sufficiently direct. In Section 4, we analyze and criticize a claim made by some theorists of predictive coding, namely, that (interesting) instances of cognitive penetration tend to occur in perceptual circumstances involving substantial noise or uncertainty. We argue that, when applied, the claim fails to explain (or perhaps even be consistent with) a large range of important and uncontroversially interesting possible cases of cognitive penetration. We conclude with a general speculation about how the recent work on the predictive mind may influence the current dialectic concerning top-down effects on perception.
本文关注的是预测编码的当代理论家如何概念化并解释认知渗透的可能实例。第1节简要阐明了预测编码框架和认知渗透。第2节提出了更精确的方式,说明预测编码框架能够解释对感知体验的真正自上而下的因果效应。第3节进一步拓展这些见解,着眼于遵循认知渗透的一个现有标准,即对感知的相关认知效应必须足够直接。在第4节中,我们分析并批评了一些预测编码理论家提出的观点,即(有趣的)认知渗透实例往往发生在涉及大量噪声或不确定性的感知情境中。我们认为,在实际应用中,这一观点无法解释(甚至可能不符合)大量重要且毫无争议的有趣的认知渗透可能案例。我们最后进行了一个一般性的推测,即关于预测心智的近期研究可能如何影响当前有关自上而下对感知的影响的辩证讨论。