Suppr超能文献

肌肉松弛剂治疗腰痛的疗效与耐受性:系统评价与荟萃分析

Efficacy and tolerability of muscle relaxants for low back pain: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Abdel Shaheed C, Maher C G, Williams K A, McLachlan A J

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Musculoskeletal Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Pain. 2017 Feb;21(2):228-237. doi: 10.1002/ejp.907. Epub 2016 Jun 22.

Abstract

Muscle relaxants are commonly prescribed for low back pain (LBP); however, there is limited evidence of their clinical efficacy and tolerability. This review evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of muscle relaxants in people with LBP. We searched online databases including Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL and PsycINFO (inception to end October 2015) and performed citation tracking for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias of randomized controlled trials of muscle relaxants. Pain outcomes were converted to a common 0-100 scale. Data were pooled using a random effects model with strength of evidence assessed using GRADE. Fifteen trials (3362 participants) were evaluated in this review. A total of five trials (496 participants) provide high quality evidence that muscle relaxants provide clinically significant pain relief in the short term for acute LBP; MD -21.3, [-29.0, -13.5]. There was no information on long-term outcomes. The median adverse event rate in clinical trials for muscle relaxants was similar to placebo 14.1% IQR (7.0-28.7%) and 16.0% (4.1-31.2%); p = 0.5, respectively. There is no evidence for the efficacy of benzodiazepines in LBP. For people with acute LBP, muscle relaxants provide clinically significant short-term pain relief. For chronic LBP, the efficacy of muscle relaxants is largely unknown. There was no eligible RCT evidence to support the efficacy of benzodiazepines in LBP. Prolonged use of these medicines in LBP cannot be guided by trial evidence. WHAT DOES THIS REVIEW ADD?: Muscle relaxants provide clinically significant pain relief for acute low back pain. Caution must be taken with the interpretation of the findings as the evidence comes from specific muscle relaxant medicines.

摘要

肌肉松弛剂常用于治疗腰痛(LBP);然而,关于其临床疗效和耐受性的证据有限。本综述评估了肌肉松弛剂对腰痛患者的疗效和耐受性。我们检索了包括Medline、EMBASE、CENTRAL和PsycINFO(截至2015年10月底)在内的在线数据库,并对符合条件的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了文献追踪。两位作者独立提取数据并评估肌肉松弛剂随机对照试验的偏倚风险。疼痛结局转换为常见的0 - 100分制。使用随机效应模型汇总数据,并使用GRADE评估证据强度。本综述评估了15项试验(3362名参与者)。共有5项试验(496名参与者)提供了高质量证据,表明肌肉松弛剂在短期内可显著缓解急性腰痛;平均差 -21.3,[-29.0,-13.5]。没有关于长期结局的信息。肌肉松弛剂临床试验中的不良事件发生率中位数与安慰剂相似,分别为14.1%四分位距(7.0 - 28.7%)和16.0%(4.1 - 31.2%);p = 0.5。没有证据表明苯二氮䓬类药物对腰痛有效。对于急性腰痛患者,肌肉松弛剂可提供临床上显著的短期疼痛缓解。对于慢性腰痛,肌肉松弛剂的疗效很大程度上未知。没有符合条件的RCT证据支持苯二氮䓬类药物对腰痛的疗效。在腰痛中延长使用这些药物无法依据试验证据指导。本综述补充了什么内容?:肌肉松弛剂可显著缓解急性腰痛。由于证据来自特定的肌肉松弛剂药物,因此在解释研究结果时必须谨慎。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验