• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

省级选举与癌症药物资金的时机

Provincial elections and timing of cancer drug funding.

作者信息

Srikanthan A, Gill S S, Chan K K W

机构信息

Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, BC;

Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON;

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2016 Jun;23(3):154-63. doi: 10.3747/co.23.3024. Epub 2016 Jun 9.

DOI:10.3747/co.23.3024
PMID:27330343
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4900826/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Concerns have been raised about the potential influence of political pressures on drug funding decisions. We evaluated the temporal relationship between cancer drug funding and provincial elections in 9 Canadian provinces.

METHODS

New indications for cancer drugs between January 2003 and December 2012 were identified, and the dates of official provincial funding dates and election dates between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2014 were retrieved. The probability of drug funding announcements in the 60-day period preceding a provincial election was evaluated using binomial probability distribution analysis.

RESULTS

Data from 9 provinces (all Canadian provinces except Quebec) were available. During the period of interest, 69 new indications for 39 individual drugs were identified. Variation in the availability of funding dates was identified. At the time of data collection, 2 provinces did not have data available for all 69 indications. For the 9 provinces, the number of funded indications during the 60-day period preceding an election ranged from 0 to 3; however, no differences in the proportion of indications funded pre-election were identified. Additional analyses also failed to demonstrate any significant associations with the 90-day period before an election, or the 60- and 90-day periods after an election.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed no clear temporal relationship between provincial election dates and funding decisions in this recent Canadian sample of new indications for cancer drugs.

摘要

背景

人们对政治压力对药物资助决策的潜在影响表示担忧。我们评估了加拿大9个省份癌症药物资助与省级选举之间的时间关系。

方法

确定2003年1月至2012年12月期间癌症药物的新适应症,并检索2003年1月1日至2014年12月31日期间省级官方资助日期和选举日期。使用二项式概率分布分析评估省级选举前60天内药物资助公告的概率。

结果

获得了9个省份(除魁北克省外的所有加拿大省份)的数据。在感兴趣的期间内,确定了39种药物的69个新适应症。发现资助日期的可用性存在差异。在数据收集时,2个省份并非所有69个适应症都有数据。对于这9个省份,选举前60天内获得资助的适应症数量从0到3不等;然而,未发现选举前获得资助的适应症比例存在差异。进一步分析也未能证明与选举前90天或选举后60天和90天有任何显著关联。

结论

在这个加拿大近期癌症药物新适应症样本中,我们未观察到省级选举日期与资助决策之间存在明确的时间关系。

相似文献

1
Provincial elections and timing of cancer drug funding.省级选举与癌症药物资金的时机
Curr Oncol. 2016 Jun;23(3):154-63. doi: 10.3747/co.23.3024. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
2
The timing of drug funding announcements relative to elections: a case study involving dementia medications.药物资助公告与选举的时间关系:以痴呆症药物为例的一项案例研究。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056921. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
3
Impact of the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review on provincial concordance with respect to cancer drug funding decisions and time to funding.泛加拿大肿瘤药物审查对各省在癌症药物资金决策和资金到位时间方面的一致性的影响。
Curr Oncol. 2017 Oct;24(5):295-301. doi: 10.3747/co.24.3648. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
4
Understanding the reasons for provincial discordance in cancer drug funding-a survey of policymakers.了解省级癌症药物资金不一致的原因——对政策制定者的一项调查
Curr Oncol. 2018 Aug;25(4):257-261. doi: 10.3747/co.25.3993. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
5
Determinants of the Cancer Drug Funding Process in Canada.加拿大癌症药物资助流程的决定因素。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Mar 15;29(3):1997-2007. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29030162.
6
Disparity in public funding of systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Canada.加拿大转移性肾细胞癌全身治疗公共资金的差异。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2022 Nov;16(11):E516-E522. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7846.
7
The impact of post-election violence on HIV and other clinical services and on mental health-Kenya, 2008.选举后暴力对艾滋病毒和其他临床服务以及心理健康的影响-肯尼亚,2008 年。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013 Feb;28(1):43-51. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X12001665. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
8
Do heads of government age more quickly? Observational study comparing mortality between elected leaders and runners-up in national elections of 17 countries.政府首脑衰老得更快吗?一项观察性研究,比较17个国家全国选举中当选领导人与落选者的死亡率。
BMJ. 2015 Dec 14;351:h6424. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6424.
9
Use of product listing agreements by Canadian provincial drug benefit plans.加拿大省级药品福利计划对产品上市协议的使用。
Healthc Policy. 2013 May;8(4):45-55.
10
Devolving authority for health care in Canada's provinces: 3. Motivations, attitudes and approaches of board members.加拿大各省医疗保健权力下放:3. 董事会成员的动机、态度和方法
CMAJ. 1997 Mar 1;156(5):669-76.

引用本文的文献

1
Determinants of the Cancer Drug Funding Process in Canada.加拿大癌症药物资助流程的决定因素。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Mar 15;29(3):1997-2007. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29030162.
2
Understanding the reasons for provincial discordance in cancer drug funding-a survey of policymakers.了解省级癌症药物资金不一致的原因——对政策制定者的一项调查
Curr Oncol. 2018 Aug;25(4):257-261. doi: 10.3747/co.25.3993. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
3
The politicization of oncology drug funding reviews in Canada.加拿大肿瘤药物资金审查的政治化
Curr Oncol. 2016 Jun;23(3):139-43. doi: 10.3747/co.23.3126. Epub 2016 Jun 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Same drugs, valued differently? Comparing comparators and methods used in reimbursement recommendations in Australia, Canada, and Korea.相同的药物,估值却不同?比较澳大利亚、加拿大和韩国报销建议中使用的对照药物和方法。
Health Policy. 2015 May;119(5):577-87. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.01.011. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
2
Informing Canada's cancer drug funding decisions with scientific evidence and patient perspectives: the Pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review.利用科学证据和患者观点为加拿大癌症药物资助决策提供信息:泛加拿大肿瘤药物审查
Curr Oncol. 2013 Apr;20(2):121-4. doi: 10.3747/co.20.1315.
3
The timing of drug funding announcements relative to elections: a case study involving dementia medications.药物资助公告与选举的时间关系:以痴呆症药物为例的一项案例研究。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056921. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
4
Using effectiveness and cost-effectiveness to make drug coverage decisions: a comparison of Britain, Australia, and Canada.利用有效性和成本效益来做出药物覆盖范围决策:英国、澳大利亚和加拿大的比较
JAMA. 2009 Oct 7;302(13):1437-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1409.
5
American Society of Clinical Oncology guidance statement: the cost of cancer care.美国临床肿瘤学会指导声明:癌症护理的成本
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 10;27(23):3868-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.1183. Epub 2009 Jul 6.
6
Drugs, sex, money and power: an HPV vaccine case study.药物、性、金钱和权力:HPV 疫苗案例研究。
Health Policy. 2009 Oct;92(2-3):288-95. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.05.002. Epub 2009 Jun 7.
7
External influences and priority-setting for anti-cancer agents: a case study of media coverage in adjuvant trastuzumab for breast cancer.抗癌药物的外部影响与优先级设定:以乳腺癌辅助治疗中曲妥珠单抗的媒体报道为例
BMC Cancer. 2007 Jun 28;7:110. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-7-110.
8
The politics of public health policy.公共卫生政策的政治学
Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:195-233. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.25.101802.123126.
9
AHCPR and the changing politics of health services research.美国医疗保健政策与研究机构(AHCPR)以及卫生服务研究不断变化的政治格局。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Jan-Jun;Suppl Web Exclusives:W3-283-307. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w3.283.
10
Priority-setting decisions for new cancer drugs: a qualitative case study.新型癌症药物的优先级设定决策:一项定性案例研究
Lancet. 2001 Nov 17;358(9294):1676-81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06714-9.