Bhargava Puneet, Agrawal Garima
Radiol Case Rep. 2015 Dec 7;8(1):824. doi: 10.2484/rcr.v8i1.824. eCollection 2013.
Once a manuscript is submitted, the journal editor decides whether the manuscript merits further peer review, and the section editor or editor-in-chief reviews those comments and makes a decision that is conveyed to the corresponding author. Almost all accepted manuscripts require revisions of some kind. One of the good things about writing a case report is that it does not usually require major revisions; for the most part, comments can be addressed rather quickly with a few changes. The most common revisions requested are providing followup imaging information or additional laboratory/pathology information, shortening the length, and modifying sentences that boast of a major conclusion based on a single case. This article focuses on how to deal with the revision process so that it is smooth for both the author and the editor; and that it leads to a quick acceptance.
稿件一经提交,期刊编辑会决定该稿件是否值得进一步同行评审,然后由栏目编辑或主编审阅这些意见并做出决定,该决定会传达给通讯作者。几乎所有被接受的稿件都需要进行某种形式的修改。撰写病例报告的一个好处是通常不需要进行重大修改;在大多数情况下,只需做一些修改就能很快处理这些意见。最常见的修改要求是提供后续影像学信息或额外的实验室/病理学信息、缩短篇幅以及修改那些基于单个病例就宣称有重大结论的句子。本文重点关注如何处理修改过程,以使作者和编辑都能顺利进行,并且能快速接受稿件。