• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国农村和非农村市场养老院信息技术成熟度现状。

The State of Nursing Home Information Technology Sophistication in Rural and Nonrural US Markets.

机构信息

Sinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.

Medical Research Office, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.

出版信息

J Rural Health. 2017 Jun;33(3):266-274. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12188. Epub 2016 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1111/jrh.12188
PMID:27333002
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test for significant differences in information technology sophistication (ITS) in US nursing homes (NH) based on location.

METHODS

We administered a primary survey January 2014 to July 2015 to NH in each US state. The survey was cross-sectional and examined 3 dimensions (IT capabilities, extent of IT use, degree of IT integration) among 3 domains (resident care, clinical support, administrative activities) of ITS. ITS was broken down by NH location. Mean responses were compared across 4 NH categories (Metropolitan, Micropolitan, Small Town, and Rural) for all 9 ITS dimensions and domains. Least square means and Tukey's method were used for multiple comparisons.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Methods yielded 815/1,799 surveys (45% response rate). In every health care domain (resident care, clinical support, and administrative activities) statistical differences in facility ITS occurred in larger (metropolitan or micropolitan) and smaller (small town or rural) populated areas.

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the most current national assessment of NH IT since 2004. Historically, NH IT has been used solely for administrative activities and much less for resident care and clinical support. However, results are encouraging as ITS in other domains appears to be greater than previously imagined.

摘要

目的

根据地理位置,测试美国养老院(NH)信息技术成熟度(ITS)的显著差异。

方法

我们于 2014 年 1 月至 2015 年 7 月期间,对美国每个州的 NH 进行了一项初步调查。该调查是横断面的,考察了 ITS 的三个领域(居民护理、临床支持、行政活动)中的三个维度(IT 能力、IT 使用程度、IT 整合程度)。根据 NH 位置对 ITS 进行细分。在所有 9 个 ITS 维度和领域中,对所有 4 个 NH 类别(大都市、小城市、小镇和农村)的所有 9 个 ITS 维度和领域,比较了平均响应。采用最小二乘均值和 Tukey 法进行多重比较。

主要发现

该方法产生了 815/1799 份调查(45%的回复率)。在每个医疗保健领域(居民护理、临床支持和行政活动),设施 ITS 在人口较多(大都市或小城市)和人口较少(小镇或农村)的地区存在统计学差异。

结论

本研究代表了自 2004 年以来对 NH IT 的最新全国评估。历史上,NH IT 仅用于行政活动,而用于居民护理和临床支持的活动要少得多。然而,结果令人鼓舞,因为其他领域的 ITS 似乎比之前想象的更大。

相似文献

1
The State of Nursing Home Information Technology Sophistication in Rural and Nonrural US Markets.美国农村和非农村市场养老院信息技术成熟度现状。
J Rural Health. 2017 Jun;33(3):266-274. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12188. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
2
Analyzing Change in Nursing Home Information Technology Sophistication: A 2-Year Survey.分析养老院信息技术成熟度的变化:一项为期两年的调查。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2017 Jan 1;43(1):17-21. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20161215-05.
3
A national report of nursing home information technology: year 1 results.一份疗养院信息技术的全国报告:第一年的结果。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Jan;24(1):67-73. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw051. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
4
Exploring Resident Care Information Technology Use and Nursing Home Quality.探索居民护理信息技术的使用与养老院质量。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2020 Apr 1;46(4):15-20. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20200303-02.
5
A Report of Information Technology and Health Deficiencies in U.S. Nursing Homes.美国养老院信息技术和健康缺陷报告。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Sep 1;17(6):e483-e489. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000390.
6
Ternary Trends in Nursing Home Information Technology and Quality Measures in the United States.美国养老院信息技术与质量指标的三元趋势
J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Oct;39(10):1134-1143. doi: 10.1177/0733464819862928. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
7
Examining Structural Disparities in US Nursing Homes: National Survey of Health Information Technology Maturity.审视美国疗养院中的结构差异:健康信息技术成熟度全国调查
JMIR Aging. 2022 Aug 23;5(3):e37482. doi: 10.2196/37482.
8
Nursing home quality: a comparative analysis using CMS Nursing Home Compare data to examine differences between rural and nonrural facilities.养老院质量:利用 CMS 养老院比较数据进行的比较分析,以检查农村和非农村设施之间的差异。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Aug;14(8):593-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.02.017. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
9
Exploring information technology (IT) sophistication in New South Wales residential aged care facilities.探索新南威尔士州养老院的信息技术(IT)成熟度。
Aust Health Rev. 2020 Apr;44(2):288-296. doi: 10.1071/AH18260.
10
Characteristics and recruitment paths of certified nursing assistants in rural and urban nursing homes.农村和城市养老院中注册护理助理的特征及招聘途径。
J Rural Health. 2009 Summer;25(3):267-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2009.00229.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatiotemporal evolution and development path of healthcare services supply in China.中国医疗服务供给的时空演变与发展路径。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 18;24(1):1258. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11545-4.
2
Spatial equity and factors associated with intensive care unit bed allocation in China.中国重症监护病房床位分配的空间公平性及相关因素
Arch Public Health. 2024 Sep 29;82(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01402-5.
3
Dynamic evolution and spatial difference of public health service supply in economically developed provinces of China: typical evidence from Guangdong Province.
中国经济发达省份的公共卫生服务供给动态演变与空间差异——以广东省为例
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 4;24(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10444-4.
4
Spatial distribution, regional differences, and dynamic evolution of the medical and health services supply in China.中国医疗卫生服务供给的空间分布、区域差异与动态演进。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 23;10:1020402. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1020402. eCollection 2022.
5
Challenges to Admitting Residents: Perspectives from Rural Nursing Home Administrators and Staff.接纳居民的挑战:农村养老院管理人员和工作人员的观点。
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211005191. doi: 10.1177/00469580211005191.
6
An evaluation of telehealth expansion in U.S. nursing homes.美国养老院远程医疗扩张评估。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Feb 15;28(2):342-348. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa253.
7
Nursing Information Flow in Long-Term Care Facilities.长期护理机构的护理信息流程。
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Apr;9(2):275-284. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1642609. Epub 2018 May 2.