• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

RAS 突变与接受结直肠癌肝转移重复肝切除患者的生存率降低相关。

RAS Mutation Is Associated with Decreased Survival in Patients Undergoing Repeat Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases.

作者信息

Denbo Jason W, Yamashita Suguru, Passot Guillaume, Egger Michael, Chun Yun S, Kopetz Scott E, Maru Dipen, Brudvik Kristoffer Watten, Wei Steven H, Conrad Claudius, Vauthey Jean-Nicolas, Aloia Thomas A

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Jan;21(1):68-77. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3189-9. Epub 2016 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1007/s11605-016-3189-9
PMID:27334313
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The relationship between RAS mutation status and outcome for patients undergoing repeat hepatectomy (RH) for recurrent colorectal liver metastases (CLM) has not been defined.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between RAS mutation status and outcome in patients undergoing RH for CLM.

METHODS

All patients who underwent RH for CLM with known RAS mutation status between January 2005 and November 2014 were identified, and the outcomes of patients with and without RAS mutations were compared.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight patients underwent RH, of whom 34 (35 %) harbored a RAS mutation. Wild-type (WT) and mutant RAS groups had similar clinicopathologic characteristics. Median recurrence-free survival (RFS) for patients with WT and mutant RAS was 12.2 and 6.1 months, respectively (p = 0.03). Median overall survival (OS) for the WT and mutant RAS patients were 42.5 and 26.6 months, respectively (p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, RAS mutations [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.69, p = 0.04] were associated with worse RFS, while multiple tumors (HR = 1.92, p = 0.045) and RAS mutations (HR = 2.11, p = 0.02) predicted worse OS.

CONCLUSION

Patients with recurrent CLM that harbor RAS mutations have worse RFS and OS than patients with WT RAS, and RAS mutations are independently associated with worse RFS and OS. RAS mutation status should be determined prior to RH, as it may impact treatment decisions.

摘要

背景

对于复发性结直肠癌肝转移(CLM)患者接受再次肝切除术(RH),RAS突变状态与预后之间的关系尚未明确。

目的

本研究的目的是评估接受RH治疗CLM患者的RAS突变状态与预后之间的关系。

方法

确定2005年1月至2014年11月期间所有接受RH治疗且已知RAS突变状态的CLM患者,并比较有和没有RAS突变患者的预后。

结果

98例患者接受了RH,其中34例(35%)存在RAS突变。野生型(WT)和突变型RAS组具有相似的临床病理特征。WT和突变型RAS患者的无复发生存期(RFS)中位数分别为12.2个月和6.1个月(p = 0.03)。WT和突变型RAS患者的总生存期(OS)中位数分别为42.5个月和26.6个月(p < 0.01)。多因素分析显示,RAS突变[风险比(HR)= 1.69,p = 0.04]与较差的RFS相关,而多发肿瘤(HR = 1.92,p = 0.045)和RAS突变(HR = 2.11,p = 0.02)预示着较差的OS。

结论

与WT RAS患者相比,存在RAS突变的复发性CLM患者具有更差的RFS和OS,且RAS突变与较差的RFS和OS独立相关。在RH之前应确定RAS突变状态,因为它可能影响治疗决策。

相似文献

1
RAS Mutation Is Associated with Decreased Survival in Patients Undergoing Repeat Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases.RAS 突变与接受结直肠癌肝转移重复肝切除患者的生存率降低相关。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Jan;21(1):68-77. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3189-9. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
2
RAS mutation status predicts survival and patterns of recurrence in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.RAS 基因突变状态可预测行肝切除术的结直肠癌肝转移患者的生存和复发模式。
Ann Surg. 2013 Oct;258(4):619-26; discussion 626-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a5025a.
3
Prognostic factors after resection of colorectal liver metastases following preoperative second-line chemotherapy: Impact of RAS mutations.术前二线化疗后结直肠癌肝转移灶切除术后的预后因素:RAS 突变的影响
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Sep;42(9):1378-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.02.249. Epub 2016 Mar 5.
4
RAS Mutation Predicts Positive Resection Margins and Narrower Resection Margins in Patients Undergoing Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases.RAS突变可预测接受结直肠癌肝转移灶切除患者的切缘阳性及切缘较窄情况。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Aug;23(8):2635-43. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5187-2. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
5
KRAS Mutation Status Predicts Site-Specific Recurrence and Survival After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases Irrespective of Location of the Primary Lesion.KRAS 突变状态可预测结直肠癌肝转移切除术后的特定部位复发及生存情况,而与原发灶位置无关。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun;23(6):1890-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5087-5. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
6
Surgical Resection for Recurrence After Two-Stage Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases Is Feasible, Is Safe, and Improves Survival.结直肠肝转移两阶段肝切除术后复发行再次手术切除是可行的、安全的,并可改善生存。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Jan;23(1):84-92. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3890-y. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
7
Repeat Hepatectomy for Recurrent Colorectal Liver Metastases: Is it Worth the Challenge?复发性结直肠癌肝转移的再次肝切除术:是否值得挑战?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Dec;19(12):2192-8. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2939-4. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
8
RAS mutation associated with short surgically controllable period in colorectal liver metastases: a retrospective study.结直肠癌肝转移中与手术可切除期较短相关的 RAS 突变:一项回顾性研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep 12;22(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03529-9.
9
Codon 13 KRAS mutation predicts patterns of recurrence in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.第 13 密码子 KRAS 突变可预测行肝切除术的结直肠癌肝转移患者的复发模式。
Cancer. 2016 Sep 1;122(17):2698-707. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30085. Epub 2016 May 31.
10
KRAS mutation influences recurrence patterns in patients undergoing hepatic resection of colorectal metastases.KRAS 基因突变影响结直肠转移瘤行肝切除术后的复发模式。
Cancer. 2014 Dec 15;120(24):3965-71. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28954. Epub 2014 Aug 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Current status and advances in the treatment of colorectal cancer with liver metastases.结直肠癌肝转移的治疗现状与进展
World J Clin Oncol. 2025 Jul 24;16(7):107438. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i7.107438.
2
The Ugly: Metastatic Colon Cancer-Surgical Options.难点:转移性结肠癌的手术选择
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2024 Jun 18;38(3):219-228. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1787825. eCollection 2025 May.
3
RAS signaling in carcinogenesis, cancer therapy and resistance mechanisms.RAS 信号通路在肿瘤发生、癌症治疗和耐药机制中的作用。

本文引用的文献

1
RAS Mutation Predicts Positive Resection Margins and Narrower Resection Margins in Patients Undergoing Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases.RAS突变可预测接受结直肠癌肝转移灶切除患者的切缘阳性及切缘较窄情况。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Aug;23(8):2635-43. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5187-2. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
2
Predictors of Safety and Efficacy of 2-Stage Hepatectomy for Bilateral Colorectal Liver Metastases.双侧结直肠癌肝转移患者二期肝切除安全性和疗效的预测因素
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jul;223(1):99-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.12.057. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
3
Meta-analysis of KRAS mutations and survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases.
J Hematol Oncol. 2024 Nov 9;17(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13045-024-01631-9.
4
Radiomics and machine learning analysis by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in colorectal liver metastases prognostic assessment.基于计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像的影像组学与机器学习分析在结直肠癌肝转移预后评估中的应用
Radiol Med. 2023 Nov;128(11):1310-1332. doi: 10.1007/s11547-023-01710-w. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
5
The Role of Targeted Therapy in the Multi-Disciplinary Approach to Colorectal Liver Metastasis.靶向治疗在结直肠癌肝转移多学科治疗方法中的作用
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 6;15(13):3513. doi: 10.3390/cancers15133513.
6
Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Genomics and Biomarkers with Focus on Local Therapies.结直肠癌肝转移:聚焦局部治疗的基因组学与生物标志物
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 9;15(6):1679. doi: 10.3390/cancers15061679.
7
Colorectal liver metastases patients prognostic assessment: prospects and limits of radiomics and radiogenomics.结直肠癌肝转移患者的预后评估:影像组学和影像基因组学的前景与局限
Infect Agent Cancer. 2023 Mar 16;18(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13027-023-00495-x.
8
Demystifying BRAF Mutation Status in Colorectal Liver Metastases : A Multi-institutional, Collaborative Approach to 6 Open Clinical Questions.揭开结直肠肝转移中 BRAF 基因突变状态的神秘面纱:对 6 个开放性临床问题的多机构合作研究
Ann Surg. 2023 Sep 1;278(3):e540-e548. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005771. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
9
PGC-1β and ERRα Promote Glutamine Metabolism and Colorectal Cancer Survival via Transcriptional Upregulation of PCK2.PGC-1β和ERRα通过转录上调PCK2促进谷氨酰胺代谢及结直肠癌存活。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Oct 5;14(19):4879. doi: 10.3390/cancers14194879.
10
Precision surgery for colorectal liver metastases: Current knowledge and future perspectives.结直肠癌肝转移的精准手术:当前认知与未来展望
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2022 Jun 27;6(5):606-615. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12591. eCollection 2022 Sep.
结直肠癌肝转移切除术后 KRAS 突变与生存的荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2015 Sep;102(10):1175-83. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9870. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
4
Discrepancies between the K-ras mutational status of primary colorectal cancers and corresponding liver metastases are found in codon 13.在密码子13处发现原发性结直肠癌与相应肝转移灶的K-ras突变状态存在差异。
Genomics. 2015 Aug;106(2):71-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 May 28.
5
BRAF and RAS mutations as prognostic factors in metastatic colorectal cancer patients undergoing liver resection.BRAF和RAS突变作为接受肝切除的转移性结直肠癌患者的预后因素
Br J Cancer. 2015 Jun 9;112(12):1921-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.142. Epub 2015 May 5.
6
Association between KRAS mutation and lung metastasis in advanced colorectal cancer.晚期结直肠癌中KRAS突变与肺转移之间的关联。
Br J Cancer. 2015 Feb 3;112(3):424-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.619. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
7
RAS mutations predict radiologic and pathologic response in patients treated with chemotherapy before resection of colorectal liver metastases.RAS突变可预测在结直肠肝转移灶切除术前接受化疗的患者的放射学和病理学反应。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Mar;22(3):834-842. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4042-6. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
8
Favorable outcome after repeat resection for colorectal liver metastases.结直肠癌肝转移灶重复切除术后的良好预后。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Dec;21(13):4293-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3863-7. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
9
Selecting patients for a second hepatectomy for colorectal metastases: an systemic review and meta-analysis.为结直肠癌肝转移患者选择进行二次肝切除术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Sep;40(9):1036-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.03.012. Epub 2014 May 22.
10
Incidence and prognostic impact of KRAS and BRAF mutation in patients undergoing liver surgery for colorectal metastases.结直肠癌肝转移患者行肝切除术的 KRAS 和 BRAF 基因突变的发生率和预后影响。
Cancer. 2013 Dec 1;119(23):4137-44. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28347. Epub 2013 Sep 19.