Department of History, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2023 Mar;47(1):12-36. doi: 10.1007/s11013-022-09779-0. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
This article reconstructs how Arab doctors, medical missionaries, British counterinsurgents, and Palestinian rebels negotiated and contested the legitimate role of medical workers and healthcare in times of colonial conflict. Drawing insight from a medical anthropological literature which challenges the notion of medical neutrality as normative, and setting mandate Palestine alongside other case studies of medicine in times of conflict from the interwar Middle East and North Africa, this article argues that while healthcare and medical authority could be put to work to support the colonial status quo, they could serve other, more radical ends too. To highlight the complexity of the political positioning of medical workers and healthcare, this article focuses on the town of Hebron during the great revolt which rocked the foundations of British rule in Palestine between 1936 and 1939, and relies on a range of colonial and missionary archival sources. The first part of the article uses the case study of an Egyptian medical doctor who took up political office in the town in moments of crisis to show how medical authority could be consciously transmuted into a force to uphold a besieged political order. The second part draws on the diary of a British mission doctor to reconstruct his efforts to assert medical neutrality during the great revolt, and-more strikingly still-how Palestinian insurgents participated actively in this attempt to transplant international legal protections to Hebron. The final part traces the incorporation of healthcare into the strategies of both British counterinsurgents and Palestinian rebels, with the British policy of collective punishment indirectly but appreciably degrading access to healthcare for Palestinians, and Palestinian counterstate ambitions extending to the establishment of insurgent medical services in the hills.
本文重构了阿拉伯医生、医疗传教士、英国反叛乱者和巴勒斯坦叛乱分子如何在殖民冲突时期协商和争夺医疗工作者和医疗保健的合法角色。本文借鉴了医学人类学的文献,该文献挑战了医疗中立作为规范的观念,并将委任统治下的巴勒斯坦与从中东和北非的两次世界大战期间的其他冲突时期的医学案例研究并列,认为医疗保健和医疗权威虽然可以用于支持殖民现状,但也可以为其他更激进的目的服务。为了突出医疗工作者和医疗保健的政治定位的复杂性,本文聚焦于希伯伦镇,该城镇在 1936 年至 1939 年震撼英国在巴勒斯坦统治基础的大起义期间,依靠一系列殖民和传教档案来源。本文的第一部分利用一位埃及医生在危机时刻在该镇担任政治职务的案例研究,展示了医疗权威如何被有意识地转化为维护被围困的政治秩序的力量。第二部分借鉴了一位英国传教医生的日记,重构了他在大起义期间试图坚持医疗中立的努力,更引人注目的是,巴勒斯坦叛乱分子如何积极参与这种将国际法律保护移植到希伯伦的尝试。最后一部分追溯了医疗保健被纳入英国反叛乱者和巴勒斯坦叛乱分子策略的情况,英国的集体惩罚政策间接地但明显地降低了巴勒斯坦人获得医疗保健的机会,而巴勒斯坦反国家的野心延伸到在山区建立叛乱分子的医疗服务。