Bouaicha Samy, Slankamenac Ksenija, Moor Beat K, Tok Sina, Andreisek Gustav, Finkenstaedt Tim
Division of Trauma, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Orthopaedics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 23;11(6):e0157946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157946. eCollection 2016.
To provide in-vivo evidence for the common biomechanical concept of transverse and craniocaudal force couples in the shoulder that are yielded by both the rotator cuff muscles (RCM) and the deltoid and to quantitatively evaluate and correlate the cross-sectional areas (CSA) of the corresponding RCM as a surrogate marker for muscle strength using MRI.
Fifty patients (mean age, 36 years; age range, 18-57 years; 41 male, 9 female) without rotator cuff tears were included in this retrospective study. Data were assessed by two readers. The CSA (mm2) of all rotator cuff muscles was measured on parasagittal T1-weighted FSE sequence at two different positions (at the established "y-position" and at a more medial slice in the presumably maximal CSA for each muscle, i.e., the "set position"). The CSA of the deltoid was measured on axial intermediate-weighted FSE sequences at three positions. CSA measurements were obtained using 1.5 Tesla MR-arthrographic shoulder. Pearson's correlation for the corresponding CSA of the force couple as well as was the intraclass correlation coefficient for the inter- and intra-reader agreement was calculated.
The mean CSA was 770 mm2 (±167) and 841 mm2 (±191) for the supraspinatus (in the y- and set-positions, respectively) and 984 mm2 (±241) and 1568 mm2 (±338) for the infraspinatus. The mean CSA was 446 mm2 (±129) and 438 mm2 (±128) for the teres minor (in the y- and set-positions, respectively) and 1953 mm2 (±553) and 2343 mm2 (±587) for the subscapularis. The three measurements of the deltoid revealed a CSA of 3063 mm2 (±839) for the upper edge, 3829 mm2 (±836) for the lower edge and 4069 mm2 (±937) for the middle of the glenoid. At the set position Pearson's correlation of the transverse force couple (subscapularis/infraspinatus) showed a moderate positive correlation of r = 0.583 (p<0.0001) and a strong correlation when the CSA of the teres minor was added to the infraspinatus CSA (r = 0.665, p = 0.0008) and a strong positive correlation of the craniocaudal force couple (supraspinatus/deltoid) that ranged from r = 0.565-0.698 (p<0.0001). Inter-reader agreement (ranged from 0.841 to 0.997, p = 0.0007) and intra-reader agreement were excellent (ranged from 0.863 to 0.999, p = 0.0006).
The significant correlation of the CSA of the RCM that form the transverse (subscapularis/infraspinatus-teres minor) and craniocaudal (supraspinatus/deltoid) force couple measured by MR-arthrography supports the biomechanical concept of a dynamically balanced shoulder in patients with an intact rotator cuff.
为肩部横向和头尾向力偶这一常见生物力学概念提供体内证据,该力偶由肩袖肌群(RCM)以及三角肌产生,并使用磁共振成像(MRI)定量评估相应RCM的横截面积(CSA),将其作为肌肉力量的替代指标并进行相关性分析。
本回顾性研究纳入了50例无肩袖撕裂的患者(平均年龄36岁;年龄范围18 - 57岁;男性41例,女性9例)。数据由两名阅片者评估。在矢状面T1加权快速自旋回波(FSE)序列上的两个不同位置(既定的“y位置”以及每个肌肉推测横截面积最大处更内侧的层面,即“设定位置”)测量所有肩袖肌群的CSA(平方毫米)。在轴向中等加权FSE序列上的三个位置测量三角肌的CSA。使用1.5特斯拉肩关节磁共振关节造影获得CSA测量值。计算力偶相应CSA的Pearson相关性以及阅片者间和阅片者内一致性的组内相关系数。
冈上肌在y位置和设定位置的平均CSA分别为770平方毫米(±167)和841平方毫米(±191),冈下肌分别为984平方毫米(±241)和1568平方毫米(±338)。小圆肌在y位置和设定位置的平均CSA分别为446平方毫米(±129)和438平方毫米(±128),肩胛下肌分别为1953平方毫米(±553)和2343平方毫米(±587)。三角肌的三次测量结果显示,盂上缘的CSA为3063平方毫米(±839),盂下缘为3829平方毫米(±836),盂中部为4069平方毫米(±937)。在设定位置,横向力偶(肩胛下肌/冈下肌)的Pearson相关性显示r = 0.583,呈中度正相关(p < 0.0001),当将小圆肌的CSA加到冈下肌CSA中时,相关性增强(r = 0.665,p = 0.0008),头尾向力偶(冈上肌/三角肌)呈强正相关,r值范围为0.565 - 0.698(p < 0.0001)。阅片者间一致性良好(范围为0.841至0.997,p = 0.0007),阅片者内一致性也极佳(范围为0.863至0.999,p = 0.0006)。
通过磁共振关节造影测量的构成横向(肩胛下肌/冈下肌 - 小圆肌)和头尾向(冈上肌/三角肌)力偶的RCM的CSA之间存在显著相关性,这支持了肩袖完整患者肩部动态平衡的生物力学概念。