Swingley Daniel
University of Pennsylvania.
Dev Psychol. 2016 Jul;52(7):1011-23. doi: 10.1037/dev0000114.
When children hear a novel word in a context presenting a novel object and a familiar one, they usually assume that the novel word refers to the novel object. In a series of experiments, we tested whether this behavior would be found when 2-year-olds interpreted novel words that differed phonologically from familiar words in only 1 sound, either a vowel or consonant. Under these conditions children almost always chose the familiar object, though examination of eye movements showed that children did detect the tested phonological distinctions. Thus, children discounted perceptible phonological variations when doing so permitted a resolution of the speaker's meaning without postulating a new word. Children with larger vocabularies made novel-word interpretations more often than children with smaller vocabularies did. The results suggest that although young children do interpret speech in terms of a learned phonological system, this does not mean that children assume that phonological distinctions imply lexical distinctions. (PsycINFO Database Record
当儿童在一个呈现新物体和熟悉物体的情境中听到一个新单词时,他们通常会认为这个新单词指的是新物体。在一系列实验中,我们测试了在以下情况下,即两岁儿童解释那些在语音上与熟悉单词仅在一个音(元音或辅音)上不同的新单词时,是否会出现这种行为。在这些条件下,儿童几乎总是选择熟悉的物体,不过对眼动的检查表明,儿童确实察觉到了所测试的语音差异。因此,当这样做能够在不假定有新单词的情况下解决说话者的意思时,儿童会忽略可感知的语音变化。词汇量大的儿童比词汇量小的儿童更常对新单词做出解释。结果表明,虽然幼儿确实会根据所学的语音系统来解释言语,但这并不意味着儿童认为语音差异就意味着词汇差异。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》)