• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰椎棘突劈开椎板成形术:一种微创腰椎减压的新技术。

Lumbar Spinous Process-Splitting Laminoplasty: A Novel Technique for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression.

作者信息

Baghdadi Yaser M K, Moussallem Charbel D, Shuaib Mohammed A, Clarke Michelle J, Dekutoski Mark B, Nassr Ahmad N

出版信息

Orthopedics. 2016 Sep 1;39(5):e950-6. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20160616-03. Epub 2016 Jun 24.

DOI:10.3928/01477447-20160616-03
PMID:27337665
Abstract

Minimally invasive posterior spinous process-splitting laminoplasty preserving the paraspinal musculature has been introduced to treat patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Despite its theoretical advantage of limiting muscular trauma, additional efforts are required to evaluate patients' clinical and functional results following this procedure. Between 2010 and 2012, 37 patients underwent spinous process-splitting laminoplasty for lumbar stenosis at a mean age of 68 years (range, 36-87 years) and were followed for minimum of 1 year (mean, 1.3 years). There were 22 (59%) men and 15 (41%) women. Mean number of levels treated with a spinous process-splitting laminoplasty was 2.2 (range, 1-6 levels). Patients had statistically significant improvements in their scores for all self-reported outcomes, including visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Short Form 36 (SF-36) components. Mean VAS significantly decreased by 4.4±3.2 points for back pain and 3.9±3.7 points for leg pain (P<.0001). Mean ODI significantly decreased by 17.5±19.1 points (P<.0001), and mean SF-36 significantly increased by 29±30.4 points (P=.0017) for the physical component and 21.8±25.6 points (P=.0062) for the mental health component. Four (10.8%) patients had a dural tear requiring repair (3 were intraoperative), 3 (8%) had an epidural hematoma requiring evacuation, 1 (2.7%) had an infection requiring irrigation and debridement, and 2 (5%) had additional decompression for symptom recurrence secondary to instability. Lumbar spinous process-splitting laminoplasty is a novel minimally invasive technique that provides adequate decompression for the neuronal elements and may avoid extensive paraspinal muscular damage associated with conventional laminectomy. Patients demonstrated significant improvements in pain and overall heath and function scores at a minimum 1-year follow-up. [Orthopedics.2016; 39(5):e950-e956.].

摘要

微创保留椎旁肌肉的棘突劈开椎板成形术已被用于治疗腰椎管狭窄症患者。尽管其在限制肌肉创伤方面具有理论优势,但仍需要进一步评估该手术后患者的临床和功能结果。2010年至2012年期间,37例患者接受了棘突劈开椎板成形术治疗腰椎管狭窄症,平均年龄68岁(范围36 - 87岁),随访至少1年(平均1.3年)。其中男性22例(59%),女性15例(41%)。棘突劈开椎板成形术治疗的平均节段数为2.2个(范围1 - 6个节段)。所有自我报告结局的评分均有统计学显著改善,包括背部和腿部疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)以及简明健康调查问卷36项(SF - 36)的各项组成部分。背部疼痛的平均VAS显著降低4.4±3.2分,腿部疼痛显著降低3.9±3.7分(P <.0001)。平均ODI显著降低17.5±19.1分(P <.0001),SF - 36身体部分平均显著提高29±30.4分(P =.0017),心理健康部分平均显著提高21.8±25.6分(P =.0062)。4例(10.8%)患者出现硬膜撕裂需要修复(3例为术中发生),3例(8%)出现硬膜外血肿需要清除,1例(2.7%)出现感染需要冲洗和清创,2例(5%)因不稳定继发症状复发需要再次减压。腰椎棘突劈开椎板成形术是一种新型的微创技术,可为神经组织提供充分减压,并可避免与传统椎板切除术相关的广泛椎旁肌肉损伤。在至少1年的随访中,患者在疼痛以及总体健康和功能评分方面有显著改善。[《骨科》.2016; 39(5):e950 - e956.]

相似文献

1
Lumbar Spinous Process-Splitting Laminoplasty: A Novel Technique for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression.腰椎棘突劈开椎板成形术:一种微创腰椎减压的新技术。
Orthopedics. 2016 Sep 1;39(5):e950-6. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20160616-03. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
2
Surgical outcomes of modified lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.改良腰椎棘突劈开椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的手术疗效
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Apr;22(4):353-7. doi: 10.3171/2014.9.SPINE1457. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
3
Clinical outcomes following sublaminar-trimming laminoplasty for extensive lumbar canal stenosis.广泛腰椎管狭窄症行椎板下减压椎板成形术后的临床疗效
Eur Spine J. 2014 Jan;23(1):80-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2888-0. Epub 2013 Jul 13.
4
Spinous process splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a critical appraisal.腰椎管狭窄症的棘突劈开椎板切除术:一项批判性评估
Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2008 Aug;51(4):204-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1073137.
5
Impact of Spinous Process Integrity on Ten to Twelve-Year Outcomes After Posterior Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Study of Open-Door Laminoplasty Using a Spinous Process-Splitting Approach.后路减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症术后 10 至 12 年随访中棘突完整性的影响:采用棘突劈开式开门椎管扩大成形术的研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Oct 21;97(20):1667-77. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01370.
6
Distraction Laminoplasty With Interlaminar Lumbar Instrumented Fusion (ILIF) for Lumbar Stenosis With or Without Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis: Technique and 2-Year Outcomes.用于治疗伴或不伴Ⅰ度腰椎滑脱的腰椎管狭窄症的撑开式椎板成形术联合椎间腰椎内固定融合术(ILIF):技术与2年随访结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Apr;41 Suppl 8:S97-S105. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001484.
7
Reduced postoperative wound pain after lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a randomized controlled study.腰椎管狭窄后路棘突劈开椎管减压术后切口疼痛减轻:一项随机对照研究。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Jan;14(1):51-8. doi: 10.3171/2010.9.SPINE09933. Epub 2010 Dec 10.
8
Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.腰椎管狭窄症减压性椎板切除术的结果:微创单侧双侧减压椎板切除术与开放椎板切除术的比较:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Aug;21(2):179-86. doi: 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE13420. Epub 2014 May 30.
9
Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates.有或无术前椎体滑脱患者行微创腰椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效及再次手术率
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Apr;22(4):339-52. doi: 10.3171/2014.11.SPINE13597. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
10
<Editors' Choice> Surgical outcomes of decompressive laminoplasty with spinous process osteotomy to treat lumbar spinal stenosis.<编辑推荐> 采用棘突截骨减压椎板成形术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的手术效果
Nagoya J Med Sci. 2018 Feb;80(1):1-9. doi: 10.18999/nagjms.80.1.1.

引用本文的文献

1
How I do it-tubular trans-spinous process muscle-sparing approach for bilateral lumbar microdiscectomy: surgical technique with illustrative video.我是如何做的——经椎板间隙双侧腰椎显微椎间盘切除术的保留肌肉管状经棘突入路:手术技术及演示视频
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2025 Aug 22;167(1):226. doi: 10.1007/s00701-025-06648-8.
2
A new surgery choice of bilateral laminoplasty for symptomatic three or more-level lumbar canal stenosis in patients over 60 years old: a two-year retrospective study.60岁以上有症状的三节段及以上腰椎管狭窄症患者双侧椎板成形术的一种新手术选择:一项为期两年的回顾性研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jul 14;26(1):680. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08940-1.
3
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Pathophysiology, Biomechanics, and Innovations in Diagnosis and Management.
腰椎管狭窄症:病理生理学、生物力学以及诊断与治疗的创新
J Spine Res Surg. 2025;7(1):1-17. doi: 10.26502/fjsrs0082. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
4
Research Progress on the Posterior Midline Lumbar Spinous Process-Splitting Approach.腰椎后正中棘突劈开入路的研究进展
Orthop Surg. 2025 Apr;17(4):990-998. doi: 10.1111/os.14355. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
5
Post-Operative Spinal Epidural Hematoma after Thoracic and Lumbar Spinous Process-Splitting Laminectomy for Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.胸腰椎棘突劈开椎板切除术后治疗胸腰椎管狭窄症并发的术后脊髓硬膜外血肿
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2019 Jan 25;3(3):244-248. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2018-0086. eCollection 2019.
6
Restoration of the Spinous Process Following Muscle-Preserving Posterior Lumbar Decompression via Sagittal Splitting of the Spinous Process.经棘突矢状劈开保留肌肉的后路腰椎减压术后棘突的重建。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2019 Mar;11(1):95-102. doi: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.95. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
7
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression by 30° Arthroscopy in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.30°关节镜下单侧双门内镜减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床及影像学结果:至少2年随访
Clin Orthop Surg. 2018 Sep;10(3):328-336. doi: 10.4055/cios.2018.10.3.328. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
8
Comparative study of two spinous process (SP) osteotomy techniques for posterior decompression surgery in lumbar spinal stenosis: SP base versus splitting osteotomy.腰椎管狭窄后路减压手术中两种棘突截骨技术的比较研究:棘突基底截骨与劈开截骨。
Eur Spine J. 2018 Jul;27(7):1644-1652. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5526-z. Epub 2018 Feb 21.