Suppr超能文献

英国农场、公共娱乐与园林场所中的鼹鼠及其防治。甘汞停用后的情形。

Moles and Mole Control on British Farms, Amenities and Gardens after Strychnine Withdrawal.

机构信息

The Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, The Recanati Kaplan Centre, University of Oxford, Tubney House, Abingdon Road, Tubney, Abingdon OX13 5QL, UK.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2016 Jun 8;6(6):39. doi: 10.3390/ani6060039.

Abstract

Moles are considered pests in Britain, but this issue has been little studied. Lower welfare standards have been tolerated for moles than for most other managed wild mammal species, as use of both the controversial poison, strychnine, and unregulated traps have been permitted. Strychnine was withdrawn in 2006 and there were fears that mole populations would increase as a result. In 2007, we conducted a comprehensive, nationwide survey of land manager perceptions, opinions and behaviour regarding moles and mole control on farms, amenities and domestic gardens in Britain. We surveyed 2150 land managers (achieving a 59% response rate) and ground-truthed 29 responses. Moles were reported to be present on most farms and amenities, and 13% of gardens, and were more common in lighter soils. Where present, moles were usually considered pests, this being more likely in Wales, Scotland and northern England, on livestock and mixed farms, and on large, high-value amenities, e.g., racecourses and golf courses. Mole control followed similar patterns to mole presence. More control may occur than is economically, and therefore potentially ethically, justified. Control should be more carefully considered and, where necessary, more effectively targeted. Kill-trapping was the favoured recent and future method on farms and amenities, even if strychnine was to be reintroduced; however, because mole traps are currently unregulated, some might not meet current welfare standards if tested. We found no evidence for an increase in moles since a farm questionnaire survey conducted in 1992; this could have wider implications for future wildlife management policy changes.

摘要

鼹鼠在英国被视为害虫,但这个问题的研究很少。与大多数其他受管理的野生哺乳动物物种相比,鼹鼠的福利标准较低,因为允许使用有争议的毒药士的宁和不受监管的陷阱。士的宁已于 2006 年被撤回,人们担心鼹鼠的数量会因此增加。2007 年,我们对英国农场、娱乐设施和私人花园的土地管理者对鼹鼠及其控制的看法、意见和行为进行了全面的全国性调查。我们调查了 2150 名土地管理者(响应率为 59%),并对 29 个回复进行了实地核实。报告称,大多数农场和娱乐设施以及 13%的花园都有鼹鼠,而且在较轻的土壤中更为常见。在有鼹鼠的地方,它们通常被认为是害虫,在威尔士、苏格兰和英格兰北部、牲畜和混合农场以及大型、高价值的娱乐设施(如赛马场和高尔夫球场)更为常见。鼹鼠控制的模式与鼹鼠的存在模式相似。可能会发生比经济上和因此可能在伦理上更合理的更多的控制。控制应该更仔细地考虑,并在必要时更有效地针对目标。在农场和娱乐设施上,捕杀陷阱是最近和未来最受欢迎的方法,即使士的宁被重新引入;然而,由于鼹鼠陷阱目前不受监管,如果进行测试,有些可能不符合当前的福利标准。我们没有发现自 1992 年进行的农场问卷调查以来鼹鼠数量增加的证据;这可能对未来的野生动物管理政策变化产生更广泛的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f523/4929419/5084193d122b/animals-06-00039-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验