• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

父母对儿童喘息的识别能力欠佳:一项横断面研究。

Parents are poor at labelling wheeze in children: a cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Shanmugam Shalini, Nathan Anna Marie, Zaki Rafdzah, Tan Kian Eng, Eg Kah Peng, Thavagnanam Surendran, de Bruyne Jessie Anne

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, University Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

University Malaya Paediatric and Child Health Research Group, University Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2016 Jun 23;16:80. doi: 10.1186/s12887-016-0616-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12887-016-0616-8
PMID:27339265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4918117/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Noisy breathing is a common presenting symptom in children. The purpose of this study is to (a) assess parental ability to label wheeze, (b) compare the ability of parents of children with and without asthma to label wheeze and (c) determine factors affecting parental ability to label wheeze correctly.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study in a tertiary hospital in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia involved parents of children with asthma. Parents of children without asthma were the control group. Eleven validated video clips showing wheeze, stridor, transmitted noises, snoring or normal breathing were shown to the parents. Parents were asked, in English or Malay, "What do you call the sound this child is making?" and "Where do you think the sound is coming from?"

RESULTS

Two hundred parents participated in this study: 100 had children with asthma while 100 did not. Most (71.5 %) answered in Malay. Only 38.5 % of parents correctly labelled wheeze. Parents were significantly better at locating than labelling wheeze (OR 2.4, 95 % CI 1.64-3.73). Parents with asthmatic children were not better at labelling wheeze than those without asthma (OR1.04, 95 % CI 0.59-1.84). Answering in English (OR 3.4, 95 % CI 1.69-7.14) and having older children with asthma (OR 9.09, 95 % CI 3.13-26.32) were associated with correct labelling of wheeze. Other sounds were mislabelled as wheeze by 16.5 % of respondents.

CONCLUSION

Parental labelling of wheeze was inaccurate especially in the Malay language. Parents were better at identifying the origin of wheeze rather than labelling it. Physicians should be wary about parental reporting of wheeze as it may be inaccurate.

摘要

背景

呼吸嘈杂是儿童常见的就诊症状。本研究的目的是:(a)评估家长对哮鸣音的识别能力;(b)比较患有和未患有哮喘的儿童家长对哮鸣音的识别能力;(c)确定影响家长正确识别哮鸣音能力的因素。

方法

这项横断面研究在马来西亚吉隆坡的一家三级医院进行,研究对象为哮喘儿童的家长。未患哮喘儿童的家长作为对照组。向家长展示11个经过验证的视频片段,内容包括哮鸣音、喘鸣、传导性杂音、打鼾或正常呼吸。用英语或马来语询问家长:“您如何称呼这个孩子发出的声音?”以及“您认为声音来自哪里?”

结果

200名家长参与了本研究,其中100名家长的孩子患有哮喘,100名家长的孩子未患哮喘。大多数(71.5%)用马来语回答。只有38.5%的家长能正确识别哮鸣音。家长在定位哮鸣音方面比识别哮鸣音做得更好(比值比2.4,95%置信区间1.64 - 3.73)。患有哮喘孩子的家长在识别哮鸣音方面并不比没有哮喘孩子的家长做得更好(比值比1.04,95%置信区间0.59 - …1.84)。用英语回答(比值比3.4,95%置信区间1.69 - 7.14)以及孩子年龄较大且患有哮喘(比值比9.09,95%置信区间3.13 - 26.32)与正确识别哮鸣音相关。16.5%的受访者将其他声音误识别为哮鸣音。

结论

家长对哮鸣音的识别不准确,尤其是在使用马来语时。家长在识别哮鸣音的来源方面比识别哮鸣音本身做得更好。医生应警惕家长对哮鸣音的报告,因为可能不准确。 (注:原文中“95 % CI 0.59 - …1.84”这里的省略号可能是原文录入错误,翻译时保留了原文格式)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4f5/4918117/03481c9116d1/12887_2016_616_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4f5/4918117/03481c9116d1/12887_2016_616_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4f5/4918117/03481c9116d1/12887_2016_616_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Parents are poor at labelling wheeze in children: a cross-sectional study.父母对儿童喘息的识别能力欠佳:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2016 Jun 23;16:80. doi: 10.1186/s12887-016-0616-8.
2
Parents' interpretations of children's respiratory symptoms on video.父母对视频中儿童呼吸道症状的解读。
Arch Dis Child. 2001 Jan;84(1):31-34. doi: 10.1136/adc.84.1.31.
3
Parental understanding of wheeze and its impact on asthma prevalence estimates.父母对喘息的理解及其对哮喘患病率估计的影响。
Eur Respir J. 2006 Dec;28(6):1124-30. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00008406. Epub 2006 Jul 26.
4
A video questionnaire identifies upper airway abnormalities in preschool children with reported wheeze.一份视频问卷可识别出有喘息症状报告的学龄前儿童的上呼吸道异常情况。
Arch Dis Child. 2005 Sep;90(9):961-4. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.071134. Epub 2005 Apr 26.
5
The wheezing schoolchild--an undiagnosed asthmatic. A follow-up of children with parentally reported episodes of wheeze without diagnosed asthma.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2000 Jun;18(2):122-6. doi: 10.1080/028134300750019034.
6
"To wheeze or not to wheeze": That is not the question.“是否喘息”:这不是问题。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Aug;130(2):403-7.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.04.043. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
7
Parents' accounts of wheeze and asthma related symptoms: a qualitative study.父母对喘息及哮喘相关症状的描述:一项定性研究
Arch Dis Child. 2002 Aug;87(2):131-4. doi: 10.1136/adc.87.2.131.
8
Respiratory noises: how useful are they clinically?呼吸音:它们在临床上有多大用处?
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2009 Feb;56(1):1-17, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2008.10.003.
9
What do parents of wheezy children understand by "wheeze"?喘息儿童的家长对“喘息”是如何理解的?
Arch Dis Child. 2000 Apr;82(4):327-32. doi: 10.1136/adc.82.4.327.
10
Recurrent wheeze in children with Down syndrome: is it asthma?唐氏综合征患儿反复喘息:是哮喘吗?
Acta Paediatr. 2011 Nov;100(11):e194-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02367.x. Epub 2011 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
How do parents of wheezing children report their symptoms? A single centre cross-sectional observational study.喘息儿童的家长如何报告他们孩子的症状?一项单中心横断面观察性研究。
Lung India. 2023 Nov-Dec;40(6):521-526. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_183_23.
2
Development of the gut microbiota during early life in premature and term infants.早产儿和足月儿生命早期肠道微生物群的发育
Gut Pathog. 2023 Jan 16;15(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13099-022-00529-6.
3
Symptom-based screening tool for asthma syndrome among young children in Uganda.乌干达幼儿哮喘综合征基于症状的筛查工具。

本文引用的文献

1
A video questionnaire identifies upper airway abnormalities in preschool children with reported wheeze.一份视频问卷可识别出有喘息症状报告的学龄前儿童的上呼吸道异常情况。
Arch Dis Child. 2005 Sep;90(9):961-4. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.071134. Epub 2005 Apr 26.
2
Reported versus confirmed wheeze and lung function in early life.早年报告的喘息与确诊的喘息及肺功能情况
Arch Dis Child. 2004 Jun;89(6):540-3. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.038539.
3
Parents' accounts of wheeze and asthma related symptoms: a qualitative study.父母对喘息及哮喘相关症状的描述:一项定性研究
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2020 May 6;30(1):18. doi: 10.1038/s41533-020-0175-1.
Arch Dis Child. 2002 Aug;87(2):131-4. doi: 10.1136/adc.87.2.131.
4
Survey of respiratory sounds in infants.婴儿呼吸音调查
Arch Dis Child. 2001 Jan;84(1):35-39. doi: 10.1136/adc.84.1.35.
5
Parents' interpretations of children's respiratory symptoms on video.父母对视频中儿童呼吸道症状的解读。
Arch Dis Child. 2001 Jan;84(1):31-34. doi: 10.1136/adc.84.1.31.
6
Validation of the ISAAC video questionnaire (AVQ3.0) in adolescents from a mixed ethnic background.针对不同种族背景青少年的儿童哮喘及过敏症国际研究(ISAAC)视频问卷(AVQ3.0)的验证
Clin Exp Allergy. 2000 Aug;30(8):1181-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2000.00882.x.
7
What do parents of wheezy children understand by "wheeze"?喘息儿童的家长对“喘息”是如何理解的?
Arch Dis Child. 2000 Apr;82(4):327-32. doi: 10.1136/adc.82.4.327.
8
International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC): rationale and methods.国际儿童哮喘和过敏研究(ISAAC):基本原理与方法
Eur Respir J. 1995 Mar;8(3):483-91. doi: 10.1183/09031936.95.08030483.
9
Symptoms in 298 infants under 6 months old, seen at home.在家中观察到的298名6个月以下婴儿的症状。
Arch Dis Child. 1990 Mar;65(3):280-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.65.3.280.