Abdel-Rahman O, Helbling D, Schmidt J, Petrausch U, Giryes A, Mehrabi A, Schöb O, Mannhart M, Zidan A, Oweira H
Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt; OncoCentrum Zurich, Gastrointestinal Tumor Center Zurich (GITZ), Zurich, Switzerland.
OncoCentrum Zurich, Gastrointestinal Tumor Center Zurich (GITZ), Zurich, Switzerland.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2016 Oct;28(10):e127-38. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
Fatigue is one of the most prominent side-effects of immune checkpoint inhibition. Therefore, we assessed the risk of fatigue associated with inhibitors of the immune checkpoints.
We examined data from the Medline and Google Scholar databases. We also examined original studies and review articles for cross-references. Eligible studies included randomised phase II and phase III trials of patients with cancer treated with ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab and tremelimumab. The authors extracted relevant information on participants(') characteristics, all-grade and high-grade fatigue and information on the methodology of the studies.
In total, 17 trials were considered eligible for the meta-analysis. The odds ratio for all-grade fatigue for CTLA-4 inhibitors was 1.23 (95% confidence interval 1.07, 1.41; P = 0.003) and for high-grade fatigue was 1.72 (95% confidence interval 1.26, 2.33; P = 0.0005). Moreover, the odds ratio for all-grade fatigue for PD-1 inhibitors was 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.62, 0.84; P < 0.0001) and for high-grade fatigue was 0.36 (95% confidence interval 0.23, 0.56; P < 0.00001).
The analysis of data showed that CTLA-4 inhibitors seem to be associated with a higher risk of all- and high-grade fatigue compared with control regimens, whereas PD-1 inhibitors seem to be associated with a lower risk of all- and high-grade fatigue compared with control regimens.
疲劳是免疫检查点抑制最突出的副作用之一。因此,我们评估了与免疫检查点抑制剂相关的疲劳风险。
我们检索了Medline和谷歌学术数据库中的数据。我们还查阅了原始研究和综述文章以获取交叉引用。符合条件的研究包括使用伊匹单抗、纳武单抗、帕博利珠单抗和曲美木单抗治疗癌症患者的随机II期和III期试验。作者提取了有关参与者特征、所有级别和高级别疲劳的相关信息以及研究方法的信息。
总共有17项试验被认为符合荟萃分析的条件。CTLA-4抑制剂导致所有级别疲劳的比值比为1.23(95%置信区间1.07, 1.41;P = 0.003),高级别疲劳的比值比为1.72(95%置信区间1.26, 2.33;P = 0.0005)。此外,PD-1抑制剂导致所有级别疲劳的比值比为0.72(95%置信区间0.62, 0.84;P < 0.0001),高级别疲劳的比值比为0.36(95%置信区间0.23, 0.56;P < 0.00001)。
数据分析表明,与对照方案相比,CTLA-4抑制剂似乎与所有级别和高级别疲劳的较高风险相关,而PD-1抑制剂似乎与所有级别和高级别疲劳的较低风险相关。