Wei Yucheng, Gu Zhitao, Shen Yi, Fu Jianhua, Tan Liejie, Zhang Peng, Han Yongtao, Chen Chun, Zhang Renquan, Li Yin, Chen Ke-Neng, Chen Hezhong, Liu Yongyu, Cui Youbing, Wang Yun, Pang Liewen, Yu Zhentao, Zhou Xinming, Liu Yangchun, Liu Yuan, Fang Wentao
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266001, China.
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China.
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2016 Jul 20;19(7):445-52. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2016.07.06.
To evaluate the role of preoperative induction therapy on prognosis of locally advanced thymic malignancies.
Between 1994 and 2012, patients received preoperative induction therapies (IT group) in the Chinese Alliance for Research in Thymomas (ChART) database, were compared with those having surgery directly after preoperative evaluation (DS group). All tumors receiving induction therapies were locally advanced (clinically stage III-IV) before treatment and those turned out to be in pathological stage I and II were considered downstaged by induction. Clinical pathological characteristics were retrospectively analyzed. To more accurately study the effect of induction therapies, stage IV patients were then excluded. Only stage I-III tumors in the IT group and stage III cases in the DS group were selected for further comparison in a subgroup analysis.
Only 68 (4%) out of 1,713 patients had induction therapies, with a R0 resection of 67.6%, 5-year recurrence of 44.9%, and 5- and 10-year overall survivals (OS) of 49.7% and 19.9%. Seventeen patients (25%) were downstaged after induction. Significantly more thymomas were downstaged than thymic carcinomas (38.7% vs 13.9%, P=0.02). Tumors downstaged after induction had significantly higher 5-year OS than those not downstaged (93.8% vs 35.6%, P=0.013). For the subgroup analysis when stage IV patients were excluded, 5-year OS was 85.2% in the DS group and 68.1% in the IT group (P<0.001), although R0 resection were similar (76.4% vs 73.3%, P=0.63). However, 5-year OS in tumors downstaged after induction (93.8%) was similar to those in the DS group (85.2%, P=0.438), both significantly higher than those not downstaged after induction (35.6%, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Only 68 (4%) out of 1,713 patients had induction therapies, with a R0 resection of 67.6%, 5-year recurrence of 44.9%, and 5- and 10-year overall survivals (OS) of 49.7% and 19.9%. Seventeen patients (25%) were downstaged after induction. Significantly more thymomas were downstaged than thymic carcinomas (38.7% vs 13.9%, P=0.02). Tumors downstaged after induction had significantly higher 5-year OS than those not downstaged (93.8% vs 35.6%, P=0.013). For the subgroup analysis when stage IV patients were excluded, 5-year OS was 85.2% in the DS group and 68.1% in the IT group (P<0.001), although R0 resection were similar (76.4% vs 73.3%, P=0.63). However, 5-year OS in tumors downstaged after induction (93.8%) was similar to those in the DS group (85.2%, P=0.438), both significantly higher than those not downstaged after induction (35.6%, P<0.001). .
评估术前诱导治疗对局部晚期胸腺恶性肿瘤预后的作用。
1994年至2012年期间,将中国胸腺瘤研究联盟(ChART)数据库中接受术前诱导治疗的患者(IT组)与术前评估后直接接受手术的患者(DS组)进行比较。所有接受诱导治疗的肿瘤在治疗前均为局部晚期(临床分期III-IV期),那些病理分期为I期和II期的肿瘤被认为通过诱导治疗实现了降期。对临床病理特征进行回顾性分析。为了更准确地研究诱导治疗的效果,随后排除IV期患者。在亚组分析中,仅选择IT组中的I-III期肿瘤和DS组中的III期病例进行进一步比较。
1713例患者中只有68例(4%)接受了诱导治疗,R0切除率为67.6%,5年复发率为44.9%,5年和10年总生存率(OS)分别为49.7%和19.9%。17例患者(25%)诱导治疗后实现了降期。胸腺瘤降期的比例显著高于胸腺癌(38.7%对13.9%,P=0.02)。诱导治疗后降期的肿瘤5年总生存率显著高于未降期的肿瘤(93.8%对35.6%,P=0.013)。在排除IV期患者的亚组分析中,DS组的5年总生存率为85.2%,IT组为68.1%(P<0.001),尽管R0切除率相似(76.4%对73.3%,P=0.63)。然而,诱导治疗后降期的肿瘤5年总生存率(93.8%)与DS组(85.2%)相似(P=0.438),两者均显著高于诱导治疗后未降期的肿瘤(35.6%,P<0.001)。
1713例患者中只有68例(4%)接受了诱导治疗,R0切除率为67.6%,5年复发率为44.9%,5年和10年总生存率(OS)分别为49.7%和19.9%。17例患者(25%)诱导治疗后实现了降期。胸腺瘤降期的比例显著高于胸腺癌(38.7%对13.9%,P=0.02)。诱导治疗后降期的肿瘤5年总生存率显著高于未降期的肿瘤(93.8%对35.6%,P=0.013)。在排除IV期患者的亚组分析中,DS组的5年总生存率为85.2%,IT组为68.1%(P<0.001),尽管R0切除率相似(76.4%对73.3%,P=0.63)。然而,诱导治疗后降期的肿瘤5年总生存率(93.8%)与DS组(85.2%)相似(P=0.438),两者均显著高于诱导治疗后未降期的肿瘤(35.6%,P<0.001)。