1CRV BV,Animal Evaluation Unit,PO Box 454,6800 AL Arnhem,The Netherlands.
2Wageningen UR Livestock Research,PO Box 338,6700 AH Wageningen,The Netherlands.
Animal. 2016 Dec;10(12):2043-2050. doi: 10.1017/S1751731116001282. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
Survival during the first year after first calving was investigated over the last 25 years, 1989-2013, as well as how the association of survival with season of calving, age at first calving (AFC) and within-herd production level has changed over that period. The data set contained 1 108 745 Dutch black-and-white cows in 2185 herds. Linear models were used to estimate (1) effect of year and season and their interaction and (2) effect of AFC, within-herd production level, and 5-year intervals and their two-way interactions, and the genetic trend. All models contained AFC and percentage of Holstein Friesian as a fixed effect, and herd-year-season, sire and maternal grandsire as random effects. Survival and functional survival were analysed. Functional survival was defined as survival adjusted for within-herd production level. Survival rate increased by 8% up to 92% in the last 25 years. When accounting for pedigree, survival showed no improvement up to 1999, but improved since then. Genetically, survival increased 3% to 4% but functional survival did not increase over the 25 years. We found an interesting difference between the genetic trends for survival and functional survival for bulls born between 1985 and 1999, where the trend for survival was still increasing, but was negative for functional survival. Since 1999, genetic trend picked up again for both survival and functional survival. AFC, season of calving and within-herd production level affected survival. Survival rate decreased 0.6%/month for survival and 1.5% for functional survival between AFC of 24 and 32 months. Calving in summer resulted in 2.0% higher survival than calving in winter. Within herd, low-producing cows had a lower survival rate than high-producing cows. However, these effects became less important during the recent years. Based on survival optimum AFC is around 24 months, but based on functional survival it is better to have an AFC<24 months. Overall, survival rate of heifers has improved considerably in the past 25 years, initially due to the focus on a high milk production. More recently, the importance of a high milk production has been reduced towards attention for functional survival.
在过去的 25 年中(1989-2013 年),我们研究了首次产犊后第一年的存活率,以及随着季节、首次产犊年龄(AFC)和群体内生产水平的变化,存活率的变化情况。该数据集包含了 2185 个群体的 1108745 头黑白花奶牛。我们使用线性模型来估计:(1)年份和季节及其相互作用的影响;(2)AFC、群体内生产水平以及 5 年间隔及其双向相互作用和遗传趋势的影响。所有模型都包含 AFC 和荷斯坦-弗里生牛的百分比作为固定效应,以及群体-年份-季节、父系和母系祖父作为随机效应。我们分析了存活率和功能存活率。功能存活率定义为调整了群体内生产水平的存活率。在过去的 25 年中,存活率从 8%提高到了 92%。在考虑系谱的情况下,直到 1999 年存活率没有提高,但从那时起就有所提高。从遗传角度来看,存活率提高了 3%到 4%,但在 25 年内功能存活率没有提高。我们发现,1985 年至 1999 年出生的公牛的存活率和功能存活率的遗传趋势之间存在一个有趣的差异,其中存活率的趋势仍在上升,但对功能存活率的影响是负面的。自 1999 年以来,存活率和功能存活率的遗传趋势再次回升。AFC、产犊季节和群体内生产水平都会影响存活率。存活率每月下降 0.6%,功能存活率每月下降 1.5%,AFC 为 24 至 32 个月。夏季产犊比冬季产犊的存活率高 2.0%。在群体内,低产奶牛的存活率低于高产奶牛。然而,这些影响在近年来变得不那么重要。基于存活率,AFC 的最佳值约为 24 个月,但基于功能存活率,AFC<24 个月更好。总的来说,在过去的 25 年中,小母牛的存活率有了显著提高,最初是因为人们关注高牛奶产量。最近,人们对高牛奶产量的重视已经降低,开始关注功能存活率。