文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

自动驾驶汽车的社会困境。

The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles.

机构信息

Toulouse School of Economics, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse, Center for Research in Management, CNRS, University of Toulouse Capitole, Toulouse, France.

Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.

出版信息

Science. 2016 Jun 24;352(6293):1573-6. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2654.


DOI:10.1126/science.aaf2654
PMID:27339987
Abstract

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) should reduce traffic accidents, but they will sometimes have to choose between two evils, such as running over pedestrians or sacrificing themselves and their passenger to save the pedestrians. Defining the algorithms that will help AVs make these moral decisions is a formidable challenge. We found that participants in six Amazon Mechanical Turk studies approved of utilitarian AVs (that is, AVs that sacrifice their passengers for the greater good) and would like others to buy them, but they would themselves prefer to ride in AVs that protect their passengers at all costs. The study participants disapprove of enforcing utilitarian regulations for AVs and would be less willing to buy such an AV. Accordingly, regulating for utilitarian algorithms may paradoxically increase casualties by postponing the adoption of a safer technology.

摘要

自动驾驶汽车(AV)应该会减少交通事故,但有时它们将不得不面临两难选择,例如,撞向行人,或者牺牲自己和乘客来拯救行人。定义有助于自动驾驶汽车做出这些道德决策的算法是一个艰巨的挑战。我们发现,六项亚马逊土耳其机器人研究参与者认可功利主义自动驾驶汽车(即,为了更大的利益而牺牲乘客的自动驾驶汽车),并希望其他人购买,但他们自己宁愿乘坐不惜一切代价保护乘客的自动驾驶汽车。研究参与者不赞成对自动驾驶汽车强制执行功利主义法规,并且不太愿意购买此类自动驾驶汽车。因此,为功利主义算法制定法规可能会通过推迟采用更安全的技术而导致伤亡人数增加,这是一个悖论。

相似文献

[1]
The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles.

Science. 2016-6-24

[2]
Autonomous vehicles: How perspective-taking accessibility alters moral judgments and consumer purchasing behavior.

Cognition. 2021-7

[3]
Self-protective and self-sacrificing preferences of pedestrians and passengers in moral dilemmas involving autonomous vehicles.

PLoS One. 2021

[4]
ETHICS. Our driverless dilemma.

Science. 2016-6-24

[5]
Agricultural vehicles and rural road safety: tackling a persistent problem.

Traffic Inj Prev. 2014

[6]
The adaptability and challenges of autonomous vehicles to pedestrians in urban China.

Accid Anal Prev. 2020-7-24

[7]
One Solution Fits All? Evaluating Different Communication Strategies of a Light-based External Human-Machine Interface for Differently Sized Automated Vehicles from a Pedestrian's Perspective.

Accid Anal Prev. 2022-6

[8]
Factors influencing safety perceptions of sharing roadways with autonomous vehicles among vulnerable roadway users.

J Safety Res. 2023-6

[9]
Risk of Injury in Moral Dilemmas With Autonomous Vehicles.

Front Robot AI. 2021-1-20

[10]
Interactions between autonomous vehicles and pedestrians at unsignalized mid-block crosswalks considering occlusions by opposing vehicles.

Accid Anal Prev. 2021-12

引用本文的文献

[1]
Evidence of spillovers from (non)cooperative human-bot to human-human interactions.

iScience. 2025-6-25

[2]
Elucidation of user autonomous driving system preference mechanisms under the extension of internal and external factors.

Sci Rep. 2025-8-17

[3]
The science fiction science method.

Nature. 2025-8

[4]
Evolving general cooperation with a Bayesian theory of mind.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025-6-24

[5]
"All things equal": ethical principles governing why autonomous vehicle experts change or retain their opinions in trolley problems-a qualitative study.

Front Robot AI. 2025-5-27

[6]
Intuitive judgements towards artificial intelligence verdicts of moral transgressions.

Br J Soc Psychol. 2025-7

[7]
Large-scale moral machine experiment on large language models.

PLoS One. 2025-5-21

[8]
Empowering safer socially sensitive autonomous vehicles using human-plausible cognitive encoding.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025-5-27

[9]
Cross-cultural differences in resolving sacrificial dilemmas: choices made and how they relate to judgments of their social acceptability.

Front Psychol. 2025-4-15

[10]
Trust, risk perception, and intention to use autonomous vehicles: an interdisciplinary bibliometric review.

AI Soc. 2025

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索