The problem with root cause analysis.
作者信息
Peerally Mohammad Farhad, Carr Susan, Waring Justin, Dixon-Woods Mary
机构信息
SAPPHIRE, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
John Walls Renal Unit, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
出版信息
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 May;26(5):417-422. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005511. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The problem with root cause analysis.根本原因分析的问题。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 May;26(5):417-422. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005511. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
2
Root cause analyses performed in a children's hospital: events, action plan strength, and implementation rates.在一家儿童医院进行的根本原因分析：事件、行动计划力度及实施率。
J Healthc Qual. 2012 Jan-Feb;34(1):55-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2011.00140.x. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
3
Root cause analysis of serious adverse events among older patients in the Veterans Health Administration.退伍军人健康管理局老年患者严重不良事件的根本原因分析
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2014 Jun;40(6):253-62. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(14)40034-5.
4
The problem with '5 whys'.“五个为什么”的问题。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Aug;26(8):671-677. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005849. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
5
Embedding learning from adverse incidents: a UK case study.从不良事件中进行嵌入式学习：英国的一个案例研究。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2017 Apr 18;30(3):216-223. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-05-2016-0060.
6
Root cause analysis in the NHS: time for change?英国国民保健制度中的根本原因分析：是时候改变了吗？
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2020 Apr 2;81(4):1-4. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2019.0352. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
7
Patient safety and the problem of many hands.患者安全与“人多手杂”问题
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jul;25(7):485-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005232. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
8
Early Engagement of Residents Into the Root Cause Analysis Process.让住院医师尽早参与根本原因分析过程。
J Grad Med Educ. 2016 Jul;8(3):459-60. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00669.1.
9
Tell me about the context, and more.告诉我相关背景等更多信息。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Jul;20(7):557-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000206.
10
Root Cause Analysis of ICU Adverse Events in the Veterans Health Administration.退伍军人健康管理局重症监护病房不良事件的根本原因分析
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2017 Nov;43(11):580-590. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
引用本文的文献
1
From Blame to Learning: The Evolution of the London Protocol for Patient Safety.从指责到学习：伦敦患者安全协议的演变
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 14;13(16):2003. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13162003.
2
Nurses' challenges and strategies for safeguarding care quality and safety: A qualitative study on situated resilience.护士保障护理质量与安全面临的挑战及策略：一项关于情境复原力的定性研究
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 Jun 11;9:100365. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100365. eCollection 2025 Dec.
3
Tracing Missing Surgical Specimens: A Quality Improvement Strategy for Adverse Events Based on Root Cause Analysis.追踪缺失的手术标本：基于根本原因分析的不良事件质量改进策略
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Jun 27;18:2139-2150. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S527015. eCollection 2025.
4
Hospital managers' experiences of conducting a root cause analysis: a case study following a sentinel event.医院管理人员进行根本原因分析的经验：一项哨点事件后的案例研究
Front Health Serv. 2025 Apr 29;5:1566335. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1566335. eCollection 2025.
5
How Were Patient Safety Incidents Responded to, Investigated, and Learned From Within the English National Health Service Before the Implementation of the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework? A Rapid Review.在《患者安全事件应对框架》实施之前，英国国家医疗服务体系是如何应对、调查和从中吸取教训的？一项快速综述。
J Patient Saf. 2025 Aug 1;21(5):e42-e55. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001349. Epub 2025 May 9.
6
Perceptions and Experiences of Consumer Representatives on Patient Safety Investigation Teams: A Qualitative Analysis.消费者代表对患者安全调查团队的认知与体验：一项定性分析
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70281. doi: 10.1111/hex.70281.
7
Strategies and tools to learn from work that goes well within healthcare patient safety practices: a mixed methods systematic review.从医疗患者安全实践中良好开展的工作中学习的策略和工具：一项混合方法的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 14;25(1):538. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12680-2.
8
Maximizing Surgical Success by Aligning Interventions to Outcomes: A Systematic Review.通过使干预措施与结果相匹配来最大化手术成功率：一项系统评价。
Ann Surg Open. 2025 Mar 7;6(1):e558. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000558. eCollection 2025 Mar.
9
Requirements for effective investigation and learning after suicide: the views of persons with lived experience and professionals.自杀后有效调查与学习的要求：有实际经历者和专业人士的观点
Front Health Serv. 2025 Feb 25;5:1519124. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1519124. eCollection 2025.
10
The problem with how we view medical (and diagnostic) error in emergency medicine.我们看待急诊医学中医疗（及诊断）错误的方式存在的问题。
Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;32(3):340-347. doi: 10.1111/acem.15076. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
本文引用的文献
1
Longitudinal patient safety education as a means to promote organizational learning in different resource settings.
Med Teach. 2016 May;38(5):532. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1149556. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
2
Patient safety and the problem of many hands.患者安全与“人多手杂”问题
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jul;25(7):485-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005232. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
3
What is the role of individual accountability in patient safety? A multi-site ethnographic study.个人问责制在患者安全中扮演着怎样的角色？一项多地点人种学研究。
Sociol Health Illn. 2016 Feb;38(2):216-32. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12370. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
4
Rebalancing risk management--Part 2: The Active Risk Control (ARC) Toolkit.重新平衡风险管理——第2部分：主动风险控制（ARC）工具包
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2015;34(3):4-17. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21160.
5
Use of the Generating Options for Active Risk Control (GO-ARC) Technique can lead to more robust risk control options.使用主动风险控制生成选项（GO-ARC）技术可带来更稳健的风险控制选项。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2014;26(4):199-211. doi: 10.3233/JRS-140636.
6
Rebalancing risk management--part 1: The Process for Active Risk Control (PARC).重新平衡风险管理——第1部分：主动风险控制流程（PARC）
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2014;34(2):21-30. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21155.
7
Mind the gap between recommendation and implementation-principles and lessons in the aftermath of incident investigations: a semi-quantitative and qualitative study of factors leading to the successful implementation of recommendations.关注建议与实施之间的差距——事件调查后的原则与经验教训：一项关于促成建议成功实施因素的半定量和定性研究
BMJ Open. 2014 May 29;4(5):e005326. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005326.
8
A just culture after Mid Staffordshire.米德斯塔福郡事件后的公正文化。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 May;23(5):356-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002483. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
9
Trust-level risk evaluation and risk control guidance in the NHS East of England.英国国民医疗服务体系（NHS）东英格兰地区的信任级别风险评估与风险控制指南
Risk Anal. 2014 Aug;34(8):1469-81. doi: 10.1111/risa.12159. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
10
An evidence-based toolkit for the development of effective and sustainable root cause analysis system safety solutions.一个用于开发有效且可持续的根本原因分析系统安全解决方案的循证工具包。
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2013;33(2):11-20. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21122.
Zotero 插件