• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Afirma基因表达分类器结果对III/IV类甲状腺结节细针穿刺活检手术管理的影响及其与手术结果的相关性

Impact of the Afirma Gene Expression Classifier Result on the Surgical Management of Thyroid Nodules with Category III/IV Cytology and Its Correlation with Surgical Outcome.

作者信息

Chaudhary Shweta, Hou Yanjun, Shen Rulong, Hooda Shveta, Li Zaibo

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Acta Cytol. 2016;60(3):205-10. doi: 10.1159/000446797. Epub 2016 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1159/000446797
PMID:27344463
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Afirma gene expression classifier (GEC) is a molecular test to further classify indeterminate fine-needle aspiration (FNA) as benign or suspicious for malignancy.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 158 FNAs with Bethesda category III/IV cytology were sent for an Afirma GEC test. We correlated the Afirma GEC results with surgical outcome and also compared the data after Afirma's implementation with the data before.

RESULTS

Among the 158 FNAs, the Afirma result was benign in 63 (40%), suspicious in 85 (54%) and unsatisfactory in 10 (6%). In total, 73 (86%) suspicious Afirma cases had surgery and 28 (38%) showed carcinoma. In contrast, only 8 (13%) benign Afirma cases had surgery and all of them were benign. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value (PPV) of Afirma were 100, 15, 100 and 38%, respectively. The PPV was 20% in cases with follicular lesion of undetermined significance, but was 50% in cases suspicious for follicular neoplasm (SFN). The surgical excisional rate was significantly decreased in SFN cases after the Afirma test.

CONCLUSIONS

The Afirma GEC is useful for further risk stratifying SFN cases.

摘要

目的

Afirma基因表达分类器(GEC)是一种分子检测方法,用于将不确定的细针穿刺活检(FNA)结果进一步分类为良性或恶性可疑。

研究设计

共158例Bethesda分类为III/IV级的FNA样本被送去进行Afirma GEC检测。我们将Afirma GEC检测结果与手术结果进行关联,并比较了Afirma检测实施前后的数据。

结果

在158例FNA样本中,Afirma检测结果为良性的有63例(40%),可疑的有85例(54%),不满意的有10例(6%)。总共有73例(86%)Afirma检测结果可疑的病例接受了手术,其中28例(38%)显示为癌。相比之下,只有8例(13%)Afirma检测结果为良性的病例接受了手术,且所有这些病例均为良性。Afirma检测的敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值和阳性预测值(PPV)分别为100%、15%、100%和38%。在意义未明的滤泡性病变病例中,PPV为20%,但在可疑滤泡性肿瘤(SFN)病例中为50%。Afirma检测后,SFN病例的手术切除率显著降低。

结论

Afirma GEC有助于对SFN病例进行进一步的风险分层。

相似文献

1
Impact of the Afirma Gene Expression Classifier Result on the Surgical Management of Thyroid Nodules with Category III/IV Cytology and Its Correlation with Surgical Outcome.Afirma基因表达分类器结果对III/IV类甲状腺结节细针穿刺活检手术管理的影响及其与手术结果的相关性
Acta Cytol. 2016;60(3):205-10. doi: 10.1159/000446797. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
2
Has Afirma gene expression classifier testing refined the indeterminate thyroid category in cytology?Afirma基因表达分类器检测是否优化了甲状腺细胞学检查中的不确定类别?
Cancer Cytopathol. 2016 Feb;124(2):100-9. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21624. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
3
An independent study of a gene expression classifier (Afirma) in the evaluation of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules.一项关于基因表达分类器(Afirma)在评估细胞学不确定的甲状腺结节中的独立研究。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Nov;99(11):4069-77. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-3584. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
4
Implications of a suspicious afirma test result in thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology: an institutional experience.甲状腺细针穿刺细胞学检查中可疑阳性结果的意义:一项机构经验。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2014 Oct;122(10):737-44. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21455. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
5
Noninvasive Follicular Variant of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma and the Afirma Gene-Expression Classifier.甲状腺乳头状癌的非侵袭性滤泡型变体与Afirma基因表达分类器
Thyroid. 2016 Jul;26(7):911-5. doi: 10.1089/thy.2015.0644.
6
The impact of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features on the performance of the Afirma gene expression classifier.具有乳头样核特征的非侵袭性滤泡性甲状腺肿瘤对Afirma基因表达分类器性能的影响。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2017 Sep;125(9):683-691. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21879. Epub 2017 May 24.
7
Qualifiers of atypia in the cytologic diagnosis of thyroid nodules are associated with different Afirma gene expression classifier results and clinical outcomes.甲状腺结节细胞诊断中异型性的限定词与不同的Afirma基因表达分类器结果及临床结局相关。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2017 May;125(5):313-322. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21827. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
8
Impact of Afirma gene expression classifier on cytopathology diagnosis and rate of thyroidectomy.Afirma基因表达分类器对细胞病理学诊断及甲状腺切除术率的影响。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2016 Oct;124(10):722-728. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21749. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
9
Relationship Between Sonographic Characteristics and Afirma Gene Expression Classifier Results in Thyroid Nodules With Indeterminate Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytopathology.甲状腺细针穿刺活检结果不确定的甲状腺结节中超声特征与Afirma基因表达分类器结果之间的关系
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Oct;205(4):861-5. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13984.
10
Afirma Gene Sequencing Classifier Compared with Gene Expression Classifier in Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules.在不确定甲状腺结节中,Affirma 基因测序分类器与基因表达分类器的比较。
Thyroid. 2019 Aug;29(8):1115-1124. doi: 10.1089/thy.2018.0733. Epub 2019 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of Afirma gene expression classifier, Afirma gene sequencing classifier, ThyroSeq v2 and ThyroSeq v3 for indeterminate (Bethesda III and IV) thyroid nodules: a meta-analysis.Afirma基因表达分类器、Afirma基因测序分类器、ThyroSeq v2和ThyroSeq v3对不确定(贝塞斯达III级和IV级)甲状腺结节的诊断准确性:一项荟萃分析。
Endocr Connect. 2024 Jun 13;13(7). doi: 10.1530/EC-24-0170. Print 2024 Jul 1.
2
Assessing Bias and Limitations of Clinical Validation Studies of Molecular Diagnostic Tests for Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.评估用于不确定甲状腺结节的分子诊断检测的临床验证研究的偏倚和局限性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Thyroid. 2022 Oct;32(10):1144-1157. doi: 10.1089/thy.2022.0269. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
3
Comparison of Afirma GEC and GSC to Nodules Without Molecular Testing in Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules.在甲状腺细针穿刺结果不确定的结节中,将Afirma基因表达分类(GEC)和基因组测序分类(GSC)与未进行分子检测的结节进行比较。
J Endocr Soc. 2021 Oct 7;5(11):bvab148. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvab148. eCollection 2021 Nov 1.
4
Thyroseq v3, Afirma GSC, and microRNA Panels Versus Previous Molecular Tests in the Preoperative Diagnosis of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Thyroseq v3、Afiirma GSC 和 microRNA 面板与术前诊断不确定甲状腺结节的先前分子检测的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 May 13;12:649522. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.649522. eCollection 2021.
5
Repeat Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Refines the Selection of Thyroid Nodules for Afirma Gene Expression Classifier Testing.重复细针抽吸细胞学检查可优化甲状腺结节 Afirma 基因表达分类器检测的选择。
Thyroid. 2021 Aug;31(8):1253-1263. doi: 10.1089/thy.2020.0969. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
6
Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesions of undetermined significance: What radiologists need to know.意义不明确的非典型/意义不明确的滤泡性病变:放射科医生需要了解的内容。
Neuroradiol J. 2021 Apr;34(2):70-79. doi: 10.1177/1971400920983566. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
7
The Diagnostic Performance of Afirma Gene Expression Classifier for the Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Meta-Analysis.《用于甲状腺结节的不确定病例的 Afirma 基因表达分类器的诊断性能:一项荟萃分析》。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Aug 20;2019:7150527. doi: 10.1155/2019/7150527. eCollection 2019.
8
Molecular Testing Versus Diagnostic Lobectomy in Bethesda III/IV Thyroid Nodules: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.分子检测与诊断性甲状腺叶切除术在 Bethesda III/IV 甲状腺结节中的应用:成本效益分析。
Thyroid. 2019 Sep;29(9):1237-1243. doi: 10.1089/thy.2018.0779.
9
Extending expressed RNA genomics from surgical decision making for cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules to targeting therapies for metastatic thyroid cancer.将表达 RNA 基因组学从针对细胞学不确定的甲状腺结节的手术决策扩展到针对转移性甲状腺癌的靶向治疗。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2019 Jun;127(6):362-369. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22132. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
10
Negative Results on Thyroid Molecular Testing Decrease Rates of Surgery for Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules.甲状腺分子检测阴性结果降低了甲状腺结节不确定患者的手术率。
Endocr Pathol. 2019 Jun;30(2):134-137. doi: 10.1007/s12022-019-9571-x.