Hang Jen-Fan, Westra William H, Cooper David S, Ali Syed Z
Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Cancer Cytopathol. 2017 Sep;125(9):683-691. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21879. Epub 2017 May 24.
A recent revision in thyroid tumor nomenclature has resulted in a change from a malignant diagnosis (noninvasive follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma) to one that is nonmalignant (noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features [NIFTP]). The objective of the current study was to evaluate the impact of this change on the performance of the Afirma gene expression classifier (GEC).
The authors retrospectively analyzed consecutive thyroid fine-needle aspiration specimens with indeterminate diagnoses on which GEC was performed. Surgical pathology material was reviewed with the reclassification of nodules into NIFTP.
GEC testing was performed on 384 fine-needle aspiration specimens diagnosed as atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) (304 cases) and suspicious for a follicular neoplasm (SFN) (80 cases) and yielded a suspicious result in 152 of the AUS cases (50%) and 50 of the SFN cases (63%). Thyroidectomy was performed on 177 patients. After reclassifying NIFTP, the positive predictive value of GEC decreased from 42% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 39%-45%) to 24% (95% CI, 22%-26%) in the AUS group and from 23% (95% CI, 19%-27%) to 13% (95% CI, 9%-18%) in the SFN group. Total thyroidectomy was performed more frequently than a partial thyroidectomy in patients with AUS with a suspicious GEC result compared with pre-GEC controls (68% vs 49%; P = .037).
Reclassification of NIFTP significantly decreases the positive predictive value of GEC in indeterminate thyroid nodules. Nevertheless, the majority of patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules with a suspicious GEC result in the study institution have undergone total thyroidectomy. This finding raises concerns over reliance on a suspicious GEC result by clinicians to justify total thyroidectomy. Cancer Cytopathol 2017;125:683-91. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
甲状腺肿瘤命名法的近期修订导致诊断从恶性(甲状腺乳头状癌的非侵袭性滤泡变体)转变为非恶性(具有乳头状核特征的非侵袭性滤泡性甲状腺肿瘤[NIFTP])。本研究的目的是评估这一变化对Afirma基因表达分类器(GEC)性能的影响。
作者回顾性分析了连续的甲状腺细针穿刺标本,这些标本诊断不明确且进行了GEC检测。对手术病理材料进行复查,将结节重新分类为NIFTP。
对384例诊断为意义不明确的非典型病变(AUS)(304例)和可疑滤泡性肿瘤(SFN)(80例)的甲状腺细针穿刺标本进行了GEC检测,结果显示152例AUS病例(50%)和50例SFN病例(63%)呈可疑结果。177例患者接受了甲状腺切除术。将结节重新分类为NIFTP后,AUS组GEC的阳性预测值从42%(95%置信区间[95%CI],39%-45%)降至24%(95%CI,22%-26%),SFN组从23%(95%CI,19%-27%)降至13%(95%CI,9%-18%)。与GEC检测前的对照组相比,GEC结果可疑的AUS患者行全甲状腺切除术的频率高于部分甲状腺切除术(68%对49%;P = 0.037)。
NIFTP的重新分类显著降低了GEC在甲状腺结节不明确病例中的阳性预测值。然而,在研究机构中,大多数GEC结果可疑的甲状腺结节不明确患者接受了全甲状腺切除术。这一发现引发了对临床医生依赖可疑GEC结果来证明全甲状腺切除术合理性的担忧。《癌症细胞病理学》2017年;125:683-91。©2017美国癌症协会。