Baillargeon Denyse, Commend Susanne
Can Bull Med Hist. 2016 Spring;33(1):131-53.
This article focuses on the thalidomide tragedy that occurred in Canada in 1962. Through the study of various primary sources, including letters sent by citizens to the federal Minister of Health and newspaper coverage of the tragedy, we provide an analysis of the public debates provoked by babies born with phocomelia in order to better assess the conception Quebec and Canadian societies had of disabled persons at the beginning of the 1960s. Inspired by the French philosopher Marie-Claire Cagnolo's classification scheme of the "logics" that characterized the treatment of disabled persons through history, the study concludes that a "separatist logic of elimination" clearly arose, while a "paternalistic logic of reparation" also began to appear. A "societal logic of integration", however, did not emerge, as concern was limited to the fate of thalidomide babies, rather than that of all disabled children.
本文聚焦于1962年发生在加拿大的沙利度胺悲剧。通过对各种一手资料的研究,包括公民写给联邦卫生部长的信件以及报纸对该悲剧的报道,我们分析了因海豹肢症患儿引发的公众辩论,以便更好地评估20世纪60年代初魁北克和加拿大社会对残疾人的认知。受法国哲学家玛丽 - 克莱尔·卡尼奥洛对历史上对待残疾人的“逻辑”分类方案的启发,该研究得出结论,一种“分离性的消除逻辑”明显出现,同时一种“家长式的补偿逻辑”也开始显现。然而,一种“社会融合逻辑”并未出现,因为人们的关注仅限于沙利度胺患儿的命运,而非所有残疾儿童的命运。