Tardivel Anne-Marie, Balleyguier Corinne, Dunant Ariane, Delaloge Suzette, Mazouni Chafika, Mathieu Marie-Christine, Dromain Clarisse
Radiology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
UMR 8081, IR4M, Paris-Sud University, Orsay, France.
Breast J. 2016 Sep;22(5):520-8. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12627. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
To assess the value on diagnostic and treatment management of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM), as adjunct to mammography (MG) and ultrasound (US) in postscreening in a breast cancer unit for patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer or with suspicious findings on conventional imaging. Retrospective review of routine use of bilateral CESM performed between September 2012 and September 2013 in 195 women with suspicious or undetermined findings on MG and/or US. CESM images were blindly reviewed by two radiologists for BI-RADS(®) assessment and probability of malignancy. Each lesion was definitely confirmed either with histopathology or follow-up. Two hundred and ninety-nine lesions were detected (221 malignant). CESM sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value and negative-predictive value were 94% (CI: 89-96%), 74% (CI: 63-83%), 91% (CI: 86-94%) and 81% (CI: 70-89%), respectively, with 18 false positive and 14 false negative. CESM changed diagnostic and treatment strategy in 41 (21%) patients either after detection of additional malignant lesions in 38 patients (19%)-with a more extensive surgery (n = 21) or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 1)-or avoiding further biopsy for 20 patients with negative CESM. CESM can be performed easily in a clinical assessment after positive breast cancer screening and may change significantly the diagnostic and treatment strategy through breast cancer staging.
评估对比增强光谱乳腺摄影(CESM)在乳腺癌单元中对新诊断乳腺癌患者或传统影像学检查有可疑发现的患者进行筛查后,作为乳腺X线摄影(MG)和超声(US)辅助手段在诊断和治疗管理中的价值。回顾性分析2012年9月至2013年9月期间对195例MG和/或US检查有可疑或未明确发现的女性进行双侧CESM常规检查的情况。两名放射科医生对CESM图像进行盲法评估,以确定BI-RADS(®)分级和恶性概率。每个病变均通过组织病理学或随访得到明确证实。共检测到299个病变(221个为恶性)。CESM的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为94%(可信区间:89-96%)、74%(可信区间:63-83%)、91%(可信区间:86-94%)和81%(可信区间:70-89%),假阳性18个,假阴性14个。CESM改变了41例(21%)患者的诊断和治疗策略,其中38例(19%)患者检测到额外的恶性病变后——采用更广泛的手术(n = 21)或新辅助化疗(n = 1)——或20例CESM阴性患者避免了进一步活检。CESM在乳腺癌筛查阳性后的临床评估中易于实施,并且可能通过乳腺癌分期显著改变诊断和治疗策略。