• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对比增强光谱乳腺摄影在筛查后评估中的附加价值

Added Value of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Postscreening Assessment.

作者信息

Tardivel Anne-Marie, Balleyguier Corinne, Dunant Ariane, Delaloge Suzette, Mazouni Chafika, Mathieu Marie-Christine, Dromain Clarisse

机构信息

Radiology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

UMR 8081, IR4M, Paris-Sud University, Orsay, France.

出版信息

Breast J. 2016 Sep;22(5):520-8. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12627. Epub 2016 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1111/tbj.12627
PMID:27345656
Abstract

To assess the value on diagnostic and treatment management of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM), as adjunct to mammography (MG) and ultrasound (US) in postscreening in a breast cancer unit for patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer or with suspicious findings on conventional imaging. Retrospective review of routine use of bilateral CESM performed between September 2012 and September 2013 in 195 women with suspicious or undetermined findings on MG and/or US. CESM images were blindly reviewed by two radiologists for BI-RADS(®) assessment and probability of malignancy. Each lesion was definitely confirmed either with histopathology or follow-up. Two hundred and ninety-nine lesions were detected (221 malignant). CESM sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value and negative-predictive value were 94% (CI: 89-96%), 74% (CI: 63-83%), 91% (CI: 86-94%) and 81% (CI: 70-89%), respectively, with 18 false positive and 14 false negative. CESM changed diagnostic and treatment strategy in 41 (21%) patients either after detection of additional malignant lesions in 38 patients (19%)-with a more extensive surgery (n = 21) or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 1)-or avoiding further biopsy for 20 patients with negative CESM. CESM can be performed easily in a clinical assessment after positive breast cancer screening and may change significantly the diagnostic and treatment strategy through breast cancer staging.

摘要

评估对比增强光谱乳腺摄影(CESM)在乳腺癌单元中对新诊断乳腺癌患者或传统影像学检查有可疑发现的患者进行筛查后,作为乳腺X线摄影(MG)和超声(US)辅助手段在诊断和治疗管理中的价值。回顾性分析2012年9月至2013年9月期间对195例MG和/或US检查有可疑或未明确发现的女性进行双侧CESM常规检查的情况。两名放射科医生对CESM图像进行盲法评估,以确定BI-RADS(®)分级和恶性概率。每个病变均通过组织病理学或随访得到明确证实。共检测到299个病变(221个为恶性)。CESM的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为94%(可信区间:89-96%)、74%(可信区间:63-83%)、91%(可信区间:86-94%)和81%(可信区间:70-89%),假阳性18个,假阴性14个。CESM改变了41例(21%)患者的诊断和治疗策略,其中38例(19%)患者检测到额外的恶性病变后——采用更广泛的手术(n = 21)或新辅助化疗(n = 1)——或20例CESM阴性患者避免了进一步活检。CESM在乳腺癌筛查阳性后的临床评估中易于实施,并且可能通过乳腺癌分期显著改变诊断和治疗策略。

相似文献

1
Added Value of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Postscreening Assessment.对比增强光谱乳腺摄影在筛查后评估中的附加价值
Breast J. 2016 Sep;22(5):520-8. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12627. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
2
Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Women With Intermediate Breast Cancer Risk and Dense Breasts.对比增强光谱乳腺摄影在具有中等乳腺癌风险和乳腺致密的女性中的应用。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Nov;211(5):W267-W274. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.19355. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
3
Comparison of the Mammography, Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography and Ultrasonography in a Group of 116 patients.116例患者的乳房X线摄影、对比增强光谱乳腺摄影及超声检查对比
Anticancer Res. 2016 Aug;36(8):4359-66.
4
Comparison between breast MRI and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography.乳腺磁共振成像与对比增强光谱乳腺摄影的比较。
Med Sci Monit. 2015 May 12;21:1358-67. doi: 10.12659/MSM.893018.
5
Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced dual-energy spectral mammography (CESM): a retrospective study involving 644 breast lesions.对比增强双能光谱乳腺摄影(CESM)的诊断性能:一项涉及 644 个乳腺病变的回顾性研究。
Radiol Med. 2019 Oct;124(10):1006-1017. doi: 10.1007/s11547-019-01056-2. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in comparison to conventional full-field digital mammography in a population of women with dense breasts.在乳腺致密的女性群体中,对比增强光谱乳腺摄影术与传统全视野数字乳腺摄影术相比的诊断准确性。
Breast Cancer. 2017 Jan;24(1):104-110. doi: 10.1007/s12282-016-0681-8. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
7
Correlation between quantitative assessment of contrast enhancement in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and histopathology-preliminary results.对比增强光谱乳腺摄影术(CESM)中对比增强定量评估与组织病理学的相关性——初步结果。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Nov;29(11):6220-6226. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06232-6. Epub 2019 May 14.
8
Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Comparison to Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Lesions.对比增强光谱乳腺摄影与磁共振成像在乳腺病变诊断中的价值比较
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2019 Mar/Apr;43(2):245-251. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000832.
9
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) versus breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): A retrospective comparison in 66 breast lesions.对比增强光谱乳腺摄影(CESM)与乳腺磁共振成像(MRI):66例乳腺病变的回顾性比较
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2017 Feb;98(2):113-123. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2016.08.013. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
10
Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography Versus Ultrasonography: Diagnostic Performance in Symptomatic Patients with Dense Breasts.对比增强频谱钼靶 X 线摄影与超声检查:致密型乳腺中症状患者的诊断性能。
Korean J Radiol. 2020 Apr;21(4):442-449. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0393.

引用本文的文献

1
Contrast-enhanced mammography improves patient access to functional breast imaging.对比增强乳腺钼靶摄影改善了患者获得功能性乳腺成像的机会。
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2025 Feb;69(1):46-61. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13789. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
2
Diagnostic Accuracy and Incremental Value of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Compared With Full Field Digital Mammography in a Tertiary Cancer Care Center.在三级癌症护理中心,对比增强乳腺X线摄影与全视野数字乳腺X线摄影相比的诊断准确性和增量价值。
Cureus. 2024 Sep 4;16(9):e68601. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68601. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Validation of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography as Breast Imaging Modality Compared to Standard Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
与标准乳腺X线摄影和数字乳腺断层合成相比,对比增强乳腺X线摄影作为乳腺成像方式的验证。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jul 21;14(14):1575. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14141575.
4
Contrast-Enhanced Mammography in Local Staging of Screen-Detected Breast Cancer.对比增强乳腺摄影在筛查性乳腺癌局部分期中的应用。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(10):6820-6830. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15848-y. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
5
The Correlation between Morpho-Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) Features and Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.乳腺形态动力学对比增强乳腺X线摄影(CEM)特征与乳腺癌预后因素的相关性:单中心回顾性分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 22;16(5):870. doi: 10.3390/cancers16050870.
6
Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) versus MRI for breast cancer staging: detection of additional malignant lesions not seen on conventional imaging.对比增强乳腺摄影(CEM)与 MRI 用于乳腺癌分期:检测常规影像未见的额外恶性病变。
Eur Radiol Exp. 2023 Feb 13;7(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s41747-022-00318-5.
7
Diagnostic Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Performed Immediately Prior to Same-Day Biopsy: An Analysis of Index Lesion Enhancement Compared to Histopathology and Follow-up in Patients With Suspicious Ultrasound Findings.同日活检前即刻进行的诊断性对比增强乳腺造影:对超声检查结果可疑患者的索引病灶增强情况与组织病理学及随访情况的分析
J Breast Imaging. 2023 Jan 2;5(1):40-47. doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbac081. eCollection 2023 Jan-Feb.
8
Can Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) Reduce Benign Breast Biopsy?对比增强频谱乳腺成像技术(CESM)能否减少良性乳腺活检?
Breast J. 2022 Mar 24;2022:7087408. doi: 10.1155/2022/7087408. eCollection 2022.
9
The PROCEM study protocol: Added value of preoperative contrast-enhanced mammography in staging of malignant breast lesions - a prospective randomized multicenter study.PROCEM 研究方案:术前对比增强乳腺摄影在恶性乳腺病变分期中的附加价值 - 一项前瞻性随机多中心研究。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Oct 18;21(1):1115. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08832-2.
10
Contrast-enhanced Mammography: State of the Art.对比增强乳腺摄影:现状。
Radiology. 2021 Apr;299(1):36-48. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021201948. Epub 2021 Mar 2.