Jones Daniel M, Padilla-Parra Sergi
Division of Structural Biology, University of Oxford, The Henry Wellcome Building for Genomic Medicine, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK.
Sensors (Basel). 2016 Jun 23;16(7):950. doi: 10.3390/s16070950.
The β-lactamase (BlaM) assay was first revealed in 1998 and was demonstrated to be a robust Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based reporter system that was compatible with a range of commonly-used cell lines. Today, the BlaM assay is available commercially as a kit and can be utilised readily and inexpensively for an array of experimental procedures that require a fluorescence-based readout. One frequent application of the BlaM assay is the measurement of viral fusion-the moment at which the genetic material harboured within virus particles is released into the cytosol following successful entry. The flexibility of the system permits evaluation of not only total fusion levels, but also the kinetics of fusion. However, significant variation exists in the scientific literature regarding the methodology by which the assay is applied to viral fusion analysis, making comparison between results difficult. In this review we draw attention to the disparity of these methodologies and examine the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Successful strategies shown to render viruses compatible with BlaM-based analyses are also discussed.
β-内酰胺酶(BlaM)检测方法于1998年首次被发现,被证明是一种强大的基于荧光共振能量转移(FRET)的报告系统,与一系列常用细胞系兼容。如今,BlaM检测方法作为试剂盒已商业化,可方便且廉价地用于一系列需要基于荧光读数的实验程序。BlaM检测方法的一个常见应用是测量病毒融合——即病毒颗粒内携带的遗传物质在成功进入后释放到细胞质中的那一刻。该系统的灵活性不仅允许评估总融合水平,还能评估融合动力学。然而,科学文献中关于该检测方法应用于病毒融合分析的方法存在显著差异,这使得结果之间的比较变得困难。在这篇综述中,我们提请注意这些方法的差异,并审视每种方法的优缺点。还讨论了使病毒与基于BlaM的分析兼容的成功策略。