• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

埃索美拉唑治疗策略在胃食管反流病症状管理中的有效性评估:一项荟萃分析。

Evaluation of the effectiveness of esomeprazole treatment strategies in the management of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Mei Jingtian, Yu Yang, Ma Jianxia, Yu Xiaofeng

出版信息

Pharmazie. 2016 May;71(5):285-91.

PMID:27348974
Abstract

Here we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of esomeprazole treatment strategies comparing with other proton pump inhibitors (PPI) in clinical practice for six months in the management of patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). An extensive search of the literature focusing on PPI therapeutic evaluation was performed up to December 2014. Risk ratio (RR) with its corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in each study was chosen as the effect size. Cochrane's Q statistic and I2 test were both conducted to evaluate heterogeneity across individual studies. Meta-regression was conducted to explore the source of heterogeneity and sensitive analysis was performed to assess the risk bias for the meta-analysis. Totally, eleven trials with high quality enrolled in the meta-analysis. Esomeprazole therapy (20 mg daily) had lower relapse rates than other drugs during six months maintenance treatment (RR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.55-0.83). Heartburn (RR = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.57-0.92) and epigastric pain (RR = 0.82, 95% Cl: 0.70-0.96) were less likely to happen after esomeprazole treatment, and no significant advantage was found on acid regurgitation and dysphagia. Moreover, lower risk for serious adverse events was observed after esomeprazole therapy (RR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.04-1.88). Blind method or difference controlled drugs did not influence heterogeneity across studies. Moreover, the conclusion on acid regurgitation, abdominal pain and dysphagia might be unstable. In GERD patients, esomeprazole 20 mg daily is more effective than other PPIs regarding relapse rates, symptoms of epigastric pain and heartburn, and serious adverse events.

摘要

本研究旨在评估在临床实践中,埃索美拉唑治疗策略相较于其他质子泵抑制剂(PPI),在为期六个月的有症状胃食管反流病(GERD)患者管理中的有效性。截至2014年12月,对聚焦于PPI治疗评估的文献进行了广泛检索。各研究中的风险比(RR)及其相应的95%置信区间(CI)被选为效应量。采用Cochrane's Q统计量和I²检验评估各研究间的异质性。进行Meta回归以探索异质性来源,并进行敏感性分析以评估Meta分析的风险偏倚。共有11项高质量试验纳入Meta分析。在六个月的维持治疗期间,埃索美拉唑疗法(每日20毫克)的复发率低于其他药物(RR = 0.67;95% CI:0.55 - 0.83)。埃索美拉唑治疗后,烧心(RR = 0.72;95% CI:0.57 - 0.92)和上腹痛(RR = 0.82,95% Cl:0.70 - 0.96)发生的可能性较小,在反酸和吞咽困难方面未发现显著优势。此外,埃索美拉唑治疗后严重不良事件的风险较低(RR = 1.40,95% CI:1.04 - 1.88)。盲法或差异对照药物不影响各研究间的异质性。此外,关于反酸、腹痛和吞咽困难的结论可能不稳定。在GERD患者中,每日20毫克的埃索美拉唑在复发率、上腹痛和烧心症状以及严重不良事件方面比其他PPI更有效。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the effectiveness of esomeprazole treatment strategies in the management of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms: a meta-analysis.埃索美拉唑治疗策略在胃食管反流病症状管理中的有效性评估:一项荟萃分析。
Pharmazie. 2016 May;71(5):285-91.
2
Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of esomeprazole in gastroesophageal reflux disease and Helicobacter pylori infection.埃索美拉唑治疗胃食管反流病和幽门螺杆菌感染有效性的荟萃分析
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2015 Aug;40(4):368-75. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12277. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
3
Safety and Tolerability of Esomeprazole in Children With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.埃索美拉唑在儿童胃食管反流病中的安全性和耐受性
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015 Jul;60 Suppl 1:S16-23. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e318176b2cb.
4
Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and effects of esomeprazole on the quality of life related to reflux and dyspepsia in patients on maintenance hemodialysis.维持性血液透析患者胃食管反流病症状的患病率及埃索美拉唑对反流和消化不良相关生活质量的影响。
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2016 Feb;20(1):134-42. doi: 10.1007/s10157-015-1130-2. Epub 2015 May 31.
5
Safety and Tolerability of Esomeprazole in Children With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.埃索美拉唑在小儿胃食管反流病中的安全性和耐受性
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015 Jul;60 Suppl 1:S16-23. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e318176b2cb.
6
Comparative effectiveness and tolerability of esomeprazole and omeprazole in gastro-esophageal reflux disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.埃索美拉唑和奥美拉唑治疗胃食管反流病的疗效及耐受性比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Oct;53(10):803-10. doi: 10.5414/CP202396.
7
Effectiveness and safety of proton pump inhibitors in infantile gastroesophageal reflux disease.质子泵抑制剂治疗婴儿胃食管反流病的有效性和安全性。
Ann Pharmacother. 2010 Mar;44(3):572-6. doi: 10.1345/aph.1M519. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
8
Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Refractory to Proton Pump Inhibitors and the Effects of Switching to 20 mg Esomeprazole on Reflux Symptoms and Quality of Life.质子泵抑制剂难治性胃食管反流病患者的临床特征以及换用20毫克埃索美拉唑对反流症状和生活质量的影响。
Med Sci Monit. 2015 Dec 31;21:4111-21. doi: 10.12659/msm.895346.
9
Is the use of esomeprazole in gastroesophageal reflux disease a cost-effective option in Poland?在波兰,使用埃索美拉唑治疗胃食管反流病是否具有成本效益?
J Comp Eff Res. 2016 Mar;5(2):169-78. doi: 10.2217/cer.15.63. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
10
Indirect comparison of randomised controlled trials: comparative efficacy of dexlansoprazole vs. esomeprazole in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.随机对照试验的间接比较:在治疗胃食管反流病方面,达克普隆(右旋兰索拉唑)与埃索美拉唑的疗效比较。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Jul;38(2):190-201. doi: 10.1111/apt.12349. Epub 2013 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Esomeprazole for the Treatment of Reflux Symptoms in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.埃索美拉唑治疗胃食管反流病患者反流症状的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Iran J Public Health. 2020 Dec;49(12):2264-2274. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v49i12.4807.
2
Marginal ulcer perforation: a single center experience.边缘溃疡穿孔:单中心经验
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017 Oct;43(5):717-722. doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0723-0. Epub 2016 Sep 12.