Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Cancer. 2016 Oct;122(19):3069-74. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30154. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data are frequently used to examine receipt of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT), but to the authors' knowledge the accuracy of data regarding second-course treatments is unknown.
Using SEER-Medicare-linked data, the authors identified a cohort of men who underwent radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer with indications for RT due to adverse pathologic risk factors. Receipt of RT was compared between the SEER database and Medicare claims, with the latter considered to be the "gold standard." Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with ascertainment of RT in SEER.
A total of 3842 men were analyzed, 749 of whom were found to have Medicare claims for RT within 1 year of undergoing prostatectomy. SEER ascertainment of postprostatectomy RT was 56% overall: 76% among patients who received RT within 2 months of prostatectomy, 73% among patients who received RT between 2 to 4 months after prostatectomy, 63% among patients who received RT between 4 to 6 months after prostatectomy, 44% among patients who received RT between 6 to 8 months after prostatectomy, and 21% among patients who received RT between 8 to 12 months after prostatectomy. On multivariable analysis, increasing time from prostatectomy to RT was found to be significantly associated with decreased SEER ascertainment (odds ratio, 0.70 per month; P<.001). There also was variation noted by SEER region and urban/rural locale.
SEER underascertains the receipt of postprostatectomy RT compared with Medicare claims, and the magnitude of the underascertainment increases with longer time between prostatectomy and RT. These findings have direct implications for the use of SEER data alone to assess patterns of care and guideline concordance for second-course treatment. Cancer 2016;122:3069-3074. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据常被用于检查辅助放疗(RT)的接受情况,但据作者所知,关于第二疗程治疗数据的准确性尚不清楚。
作者使用 SEER-医疗保险链接数据,确定了一组因不良病理危险因素而接受根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌且有 RT 指征的男性患者。RT 的接受情况在 SEER 数据库和医疗保险索赔之间进行了比较,后者被认为是“金标准”。多变量逻辑回归用于评估与 SEER 中 RT 确定相关的因素。
共分析了 3842 名男性患者,其中 749 名患者在前列腺切除术后 1 年内有医疗保险 RT 索赔。总体而言,SEER 对前列腺切除术后 RT 的确定率为 56%:在前列腺切除术 2 个月内接受 RT 的患者中为 76%,在前列腺切除术 2 至 4 个月后接受 RT 的患者中为 73%,在前列腺切除术 4 至 6 个月后接受 RT 的患者中为 63%,在前列腺切除术 6 至 8 个月后接受 RT 的患者中为 44%,在前列腺切除术 8 至 12 个月后接受 RT 的患者中为 21%。多变量分析显示,从前列腺切除术到 RT 的时间间隔越长,SEER 确定率显著降低(优势比,每月 0.70;P<.001)。SEER 区域和城乡地点也存在差异。
与医疗保险索赔相比,SEER 对前列腺切除术后 RT 的接受情况的确定率较低,而且从前列腺切除术到 RT 的时间间隔越长,确定率越低。这些发现直接影响到单独使用 SEER 数据来评估第二疗程治疗的护理模式和指南一致性。癌症 2016;122:3069-3074。©2016 美国癌症协会。