Mastellos Dimitrios C, Reis Edimara S, Yancopoulou Despina, Hajishengallis George, Ricklin Daniel, Lambris John D
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA; Division of Biodiagnostic Sciences and Technologies, INRASTES, National Center for Scientific Research 'Demokritos', Aghia Paraskevi Attikis, 15310 Athens, Greece.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA.
Immunobiology. 2016 Oct;221(10):1046-57. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2016.06.013. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
Complement dysregulation is increasingly recognized as an important pathogenic driver in a number of clinical disorders. Complement-triggered pathways intertwine with key inflammatory and tissue destructive processes that can either increase the risk of disease or exacerbate pathology in acute or chronic conditions. The launch of the first complement-targeted drugs in the clinic has undeniably stirred the field of complement therapeutic design, providing new insights into complement's contribution to disease pathogenesis and also helping to leverage a more personalized, comprehensive approach to patient management. In this regard, a rapidly expanding toolbox of complement therapeutics is being developed to address unmet clinical needs in several immune-mediated and inflammatory diseases. Elegant approaches employing both surface-directed and fluid-phase inhibitors have exploited diverse components of the complement cascade as putative points of therapeutic intervention. Targeting C3, the central hub of the system, has proven to be a promising strategy for developing biologics as well as small-molecule inhibitors with clinical potential. Complement modulation at the level of C3 has recently shown promise in preclinical primate models, opening up new avenues for therapeutic intervention in both acute and chronic indications fueled by uncontrolled C3 turnover. This review highlights recent developments in the field of complement therapeutics, focusing on C3-directed inhibitors and alternative pathway (AP) regulator-based approaches. Translational perspectives and considerations are discussed, particularly with regard to the structure-guided drug optimization and clinical advancement of a new generation of C3-targeted peptidic inhibitors.
补体调节异常日益被认为是多种临床疾病的重要致病驱动因素。补体触发的途径与关键的炎症和组织破坏过程相互交织,这些过程可能会增加疾病风险,或在急性或慢性疾病中加剧病理状况。临床上首批补体靶向药物的推出无疑搅动了补体治疗设计领域,为补体在疾病发病机制中的作用提供了新见解,也有助于采用更个性化、全面的方法进行患者管理。在这方面,正在开发一个迅速扩展的补体治疗工具包,以满足几种免疫介导和炎症性疾病中未满足的临床需求。采用表面导向和液相抑制剂的精妙方法利用了补体级联反应的多种成分作为潜在的治疗干预点。靶向系统的中心枢纽C3已被证明是开发具有临床潜力的生物制剂和小分子抑制剂的一种有前景的策略。最近,在临床前灵长类动物模型中,C3水平的补体调节已显示出前景,为在由不受控制的C3周转引发的急性和慢性适应症中进行治疗干预开辟了新途径。本综述重点介绍补体治疗领域的最新进展,重点关注C3导向抑制剂和基于替代途径(AP)调节剂的方法。讨论了转化观点和考虑因素,特别是关于新一代C3靶向肽抑制剂的结构导向药物优化和临床进展。