Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, Public Health Research Institute (IRSPUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 28;6(6):e011503. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011503.
To examine whether the association between emotional support and indicators of health and quality of life differs between Canadian and Latin American older adults.
Cross-sectional analysis of the International Mobility in Aging Study (IMIAS). Social support from friends, family members, children and partner was measured with a previously validated social network and support scale (IMIAS-SNSS). Low social support was defined as ranking in the lowest site-specific quartile. Prevalence ratios (PR) of good health, depression and good quality of life were estimated with Poisson regression models, adjusting for age, gender, education, income and disability in activities of daily living.
Kingston and Saint-Hyacinthe in Canada, Manizales in Colombia and Natal in Brazil.
1600 community-dwelling adults aged 65-74 years, n=400 at each site.
Likert scale question on self-rated health, Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale and 10-point analogical quality-of-life (QoL) scale.
Relationships between social support and study outcomes differed between Canadian and Latin American older adults. Among Canadians, those without a partner had a lower prevalence of good health (PR=0.90; 95% CI 0.82 to 0.98), and those with high support from friends had a higher prevalence of good health (PR=1.09; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.18). Among Latin Americans, depression was lower among those with high levels of support from family (PR=0.63; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.83), children (PR=0.60; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.80) and partner (PR=0.57; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.77); good QoL was associated with high levels of support from children (PR=1.54; 95% CI 1.20 to 1.99) and partner (PR=1.31; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.67).
Among older adults, different sources of support were relevant to health across societies. Support from friends and having a partner were related to good health in Canada, whereas in Latin America, support from family, children and partner were associated with less depression and better QoL.
探讨情感支持与健康和生活质量指标之间的关联在加拿大和拉丁美洲老年人中是否存在差异。
国际老龄化迁移研究(IMIAS)的横断面分析。通过先前验证的社会网络和支持量表(IMIAS-SNSS)测量来自朋友、家庭成员、子女和伴侣的社会支持。低社会支持被定义为在特定地点的最低四分位数排名。使用泊松回归模型调整年龄、性别、教育、收入和日常生活活动障碍,估计健康状况良好、抑郁和生活质量良好的患病率比(PR)。
加拿大金斯敦和圣-海辛特、哥伦比亚马尼萨莱斯和巴西纳塔尔。
1600 名 65-74 岁的社区居住成年人,每个地点 400 名。
自我报告健康的李克特量表问题、流行病学研究抑郁量表和 10 分类比生活质量(QoL)量表。
社会支持与研究结果之间的关系在加拿大和拉丁美洲老年人中存在差异。在加拿大人中,没有伴侣的人健康状况良好的患病率较低(PR=0.90;95%CI 0.82 至 0.98),而朋友支持度高的人健康状况良好的患病率较高(PR=1.09;95%CI 1.01 至 1.18)。在拉丁美洲人中,家庭(PR=0.63;95%CI 0.48 至 0.83)、子女(PR=0.60;95%CI 0.45 至 0.80)和伴侣(PR=0.57;95%CI 0.31 至 0.77)的支持度高与抑郁程度低相关;儿童(PR=1.54;95%CI 1.20 至 1.99)和伴侣(PR=1.31;95%CI 1.03 至 1.67)的支持度高与 QoL 良好相关。
在老年人中,不同来源的支持在不同社会中与健康相关。在加拿大,朋友和伴侣的支持与健康状况良好有关,而在拉丁美洲,家庭、子女和伴侣的支持与抑郁程度较低和生活质量较好有关。