Chapleau M W, Hajduczok G, Abboud F M
Cardiovascular Center, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242.
Am J Physiol. 1989 Jun;256(6 Pt 2):H1735-41. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1989.256.6.H1735.
The reflex decrease in arterial pressure is greater and more sustained with elevated pulsatile than with elevated static carotid sinus pressure. The purpose of this study was to relate afferent baroreceptor activity (BRA) and efferent sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) during static and pulsatile pressure to evaluate the influence of pulsatile pressure on the central mediation of the baroreflex. The carotid sinuses were isolated in 11 dogs anesthetized with chloralose. Both vagosympathetic trunks were cut and both carotid sinuses exposed to static and pulsatile pressures over a range of mean carotid sinus pressures (40-180 mmHg). BRA was recorded from one carotid sinus nerve, and the other intact carotid sinus served to initiate reflex changes in lumbar or renal SNA and arterial pressure. For the same mean carotid sinus pressure, pulsatile pressure caused significantly greater inhibition of SNA than static pressure. More importantly, for the same or lesser levels of baroreceptor activity per second, pulsatile pressure caused significantly greater inhibition of SNA than static pressure. The inhibition of SNA was not sustained (i.e., there was "adaptation") with continuous baroreceptor input during static pressure, whereas the inhibition of SNA was sustained (i.e., there was no significant adaptation) with the phasic input during pulsatile pressure. Increases in pulse frequency from 1.4 to 2.5 and 3.7 Hz caused progressively less inhibition of SNA.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
与静态颈动脉窦压力升高相比,搏动性压力升高时动脉压力的反射性降低更显著且更持久。本研究的目的是关联静态和搏动性压力期间的传入压力感受器活动(BRA)和传出交感神经活动(SNA),以评估搏动性压力对压力感受性反射中枢调节的影响。在11只用氯醛糖麻醉的犬中分离出颈动脉窦。切断双侧迷走交感干,使双侧颈动脉窦在一系列平均颈动脉窦压力(40 - 180 mmHg)范围内暴露于静态和搏动性压力。从一条颈动脉窦神经记录BRA,另一条完整的颈动脉窦用于引发腰段或肾段SNA及动脉压力的反射性变化。对于相同的平均颈动脉窦压力,搏动性压力比静态压力对SNA的抑制作用显著更强。更重要的是,对于每秒相同或更低水平的压力感受器活动,搏动性压力比静态压力对SNA的抑制作用显著更强。在静态压力期间,持续的压力感受器输入时SNA的抑制并不持久(即存在“适应”),而在搏动性压力期间,相位性输入时SNA的抑制是持久的(即无明显适应)。脉搏频率从1.4 Hz增加到2.5 Hz和3.7 Hz时,对SNA的抑制作用逐渐减弱。(摘要截短于250字)