Nolen Haley A, Moore Justin Xavier, Rodgers Joel B, Wang Henry E, Walter Lauren A
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama.
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama; Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Yale J Biol Med. 2016 Jun 27;89(2):131-42. eCollection 2016 Jun.
Despite historical gender bias against female physicians, few studies have investigated patients' physician gender preference in the emergency department (ED) setting. We sought to determine if there is an association between ED patient demographics and physician gender preference. We surveyed patients presenting to an ED to determine association between patient demographics and patient physician gender preference for five ED situations: 1) 'routine' visit, 2) emergency visit, 3) 'sensitive' medical visit, 4) minor surgical/'procedural' visit, and 5) 'bad news' delivery. A total of 200 ED patients were surveyed. The majority of ED patients reported no physician gender preference for 'routine' visits (89.5 percent), 'emergent' visits (89 percent), 'sensitive' medical visits (59 percent), 'procedural' visits (89 percent) or when receiving 'bad news' (82 percent). In the setting of 'routine' visits and 'sensitive' medical visits, there was a propensity for same-sex physician preference.
尽管历史上存在对女医生的性别偏见,但很少有研究调查过患者在急诊科对医生性别的偏好。我们试图确定急诊科患者的人口统计学特征与医生性别偏好之间是否存在关联。我们对到急诊科就诊的患者进行了调查,以确定在以下五种急诊科情况中患者的人口统计学特征与患者对医生性别的偏好之间的关联:1)“常规”就诊;2)急诊就诊;3)“敏感”医疗就诊;4)小型外科/“程序性”就诊;5)传达“坏消息”。总共对200名急诊科患者进行了调查。大多数急诊科患者表示,在“常规”就诊(89.5%)、“急诊”就诊(89%)、“敏感”医疗就诊(59%)、“程序性”就诊(89%)或收到“坏消息”时(82%),对医生的性别没有偏好。在“常规”就诊和“敏感”医疗就诊的情况下,患者倾向于选择同性别的医生。