Suppr超能文献

老年非阵发性心房颤动患者的盒式隔离策略的可行性。

The feasibility of a Box isolation strategy for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in elderly patients.

作者信息

Higuchi Satoshi, Sohara Hiroshi, Nakamura Yoshinori, Ihara Minoru, Yamaguchi Yoshio, Shoda Morio, Hagiwara Nobuhisa, Satake Shutaro

机构信息

The Heart Rhythm Center, Hayama Heart Center, 1898-1 Shimoyamaguchi, Hayama-cho, Miura-gun, Kanagawa 240-0116, Japan.

Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women׳s Medical University, 8-1, Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan.

出版信息

J Arrhythm. 2016 Jun;32(3):198-203. doi: 10.1016/j.joa.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Mar 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (non-PAF) is a therapeutic challenge especially in elderly patients. This study describes the feasibility of a posterior left atrium isolation as a substrate modification in addition to pulmonary vein isolation, the so-called Box isolation, for elderly patients with non-PAF.

METHODS

Two hundred twenty-nine consecutive patients who underwent Box isolations for drug-refractory non-PAF were divided into two groups according to their age; younger group comprising 175 patients aged <75 years and elderly group comprising 54 patients aged ≥75 years.

RESULTS

During 23.7±12.0 months of follow-up, the arrhythmia-free rates after one procedure were 53.1% in younger group versus 48.1% in elderly group (p=0.50). Following the second procedure, all patients had electrical conduction recoveries along the initial Box lesion. However, a complete Box re-isolation was highly established in both age groups (87.1% vs. 92.9%, respectively; p=1.00). Recurrence of macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia was mainly associated with the gaps through the initial Box lesion in both age groups (25.8% vs. 21.4%, p=1.00), but typical cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI) dependent atrial flutter was significantly observed in the elderly patients' group only (all events were observed within 6 months after the initial procedure; 3.2% vs. 28.6%, p=0.009). After two procedures, the arrhythmia-free rates increased to 73.1% in younger group versus 66.7% in elderly group (p=0.38). The occurrence rate of procedural-related complications did not differ between the two age groups, and there were no life-threatening complications even in elderly patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Box isolation of non-PAF is effective and safe even in elderly patients. A prophylactic CTI ablation combined with Box isolation might be feasible to improve the long-term outcome.

摘要

背景

非阵发性心房颤动(非PAF)的导管消融是一项治疗挑战,尤其在老年患者中。本研究描述了对于非PAF老年患者,除肺静脉隔离外,进行左心房后壁隔离作为基质改良(即所谓的“Box隔离”)的可行性。

方法

连续229例因药物难治性非PAF接受Box隔离的患者根据年龄分为两组;较年轻组包括175例年龄<75岁的患者,老年组包括54例年龄≥75岁的患者。

结果

在23.7±12.0个月的随访期间,初次手术后无心律失常发生率在较年轻组为53.1%,老年组为48.1%(p = 0.50)。第二次手术后,所有患者沿最初的Box损伤处均有电传导恢复。然而,在两个年龄组中均高度确立了完全的Box再次隔离(分别为87.1%和92.9%;p = 1.00)。两个年龄组中,大折返性房性心动过速的复发主要与最初Box损伤处的间隙有关(25.8%对21.4%,p = 1.00),但仅在老年患者组中显著观察到典型的腔静脉-三尖瓣峡部(CTI)依赖性房扑(所有事件均在初次手术后6个月内观察到;3.2%对28.6%,p = 0.009)。两次手术后,无心律失常发生率在较年轻组升至73.1%,老年组为66.7%(p = 0.38)。两个年龄组之间手术相关并发症的发生率无差异,即使在老年患者中也没有危及生命的并发症。

结论

非PAF的Box隔离即使在老年患者中也是有效且安全的。预防性CTI消融联合Box隔离可能对改善长期结局是可行的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e1c/4913153/66ec58d47cc9/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验