Thiels Cornelius A, Hanson Kristine T, Yost Kathleen J, Zielinski Martin D, Habermann Elizabeth B, Cima Robert R
*Department of Surgery, Rochester, MN †Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery Surgical Outcomes Program, Rochester, MN ‡Care Experience Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Ann Surg. 2016 Oct;264(4):666-73. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001847.
We aimed to evaluate variations in patient experience measures across different surgical specialties and to assess the impact of further case-mix adjustment.
Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) is a publicly reported survey of patients' hospital experiences that directly influence Medicare reimbursement.
All adult surgical inpatients meeting criteria for HCAHPS sampling from 2013 to 2014 at a single academic center were identified. HCAHPS measures were analyzed according to published top-box and Star-rating methodologies, and were dichotomized ("high" vs "low"). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent associations of high patient scores on various HCAHPS measures with specialty, diagnosis-related group complexity, cancer diagnosis, sex, and emergency admission after adjusting for HCAHPS case-mix adjusters (education, overall health status, language, and age).
We identified 36,551 eligible patients, of which 30.8% (n = 11,273) completed HCAHPS. Women [odds ratio (OR) 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-0.85, P < 0.001], complex cases (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.99, P = 0.02), and emergency admissions (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.55-0.82, P < 0.001) had lesser Star scores on adjusted analysis, whereas patients with a cancer diagnosis had greater Star scores (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.03-1.29, P = 0.01). Using general surgery as the reference, the Star scores varied significantly across 12 specialties (range OR 0.65 for plastics to 1.29 for transplant surgery). Patient responses to individual composite scores (pain, care transition, physician, and nurse) varied by specialty.
HCAHPS case-mix adjustment does not include adjustment for specialty or diagnosis, which may result in artificially lower scores for centers that provide a high level of complex care. Further research is needed to ensure that the HCAHPS is an unbiased comparison tool.
我们旨在评估不同外科专业患者体验指标的差异,并评估进一步病例组合调整的影响。
医院医疗服务提供者和系统消费者评估(HCAHPS)是一项公开报告的患者医院体验调查,直接影响医疗保险报销。
确定了2013年至2014年在单一学术中心符合HCAHPS抽样标准的所有成年外科住院患者。根据已公布的顶级评分和星级评定方法对HCAHPS指标进行分析,并将其分为两类(“高”与“低”)。在调整HCAHPS病例组合调整因素(教育程度、总体健康状况、语言和年龄)后,使用多变量逻辑回归来确定患者在各种HCAHPS指标上的高得分与专业、诊断相关组复杂性、癌症诊断、性别和急诊入院之间的独立关联。
我们确定了36,551名符合条件的患者,其中30.8%(n = 11,273)完成了HCAHPS调查。在调整分析中,女性[优势比(OR)0.78,95%置信区间(CI)0.72 - 0.85,P < 0.001]、复杂病例(OR 0.90,95% CI 0.82 - 0.99,P = 0.02)和急诊入院患者(OR 0.67,95% CI 0.55 - 0.82,P < 0.001)的星级得分较低,而患有癌症诊断的患者星级得分较高(OR 1.15,95% CI 1.03 - 1.29,P = 0.01)。以普通外科为参照,12个专业的星级得分差异显著(范围从整形外科的OR 0.65到移植手术的OR 1.29)。患者对各个综合评分(疼痛、护理过渡、医生和护士)的反应因专业而异。
HCAHPS病例组合调整不包括对专业或诊断的调整,这可能导致为提供高水平复杂护理的中心人为降低得分。需要进一步研究以确保HCAHPS是一个无偏的比较工具。