Iannuzzi James C, Kahn Steven A, Zhang Linlin, Gestring Mark L, Noyes Katia, Monson John R T
Surgical Health Outcomes & Research Enterprise, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
J Surg Res. 2015 Jul;197(1):155-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.03.045. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
Hospital consumer assessment of health care providers and systems (HCAHPS) survey scores formally recognize that patients are central to health care, shifting quality metrics from the physician to patient perspective. This study describes clinical predictors of patient satisfaction in surgical patients.
Analysis of a single institution's Surgical Department HCAHPS responses was performed from March 2011-October 2012. The end points were top box satisfaction on two global domains. Multivariable regression was used to determine satisfaction predictors including HCAHPS domains, demographics, and clinical variables such as comorbidities, intensive care unit stay, emergency case, discharge day, floor transfers, complications, and ancillary procedures.
In total, 978 surveys were evaluated representing admissions to Acute care and/or Trauma (n = 177, 18.1%), Thoracic (n = 169, 17.3%), Colorectal (n = 107, 10.9%), Transplant (n = 95, 9.7%), Vascular (n = 92, 9.4%), Oncology (n = 88, 9.0%), Plastic (n = 49, 5.0%), and Cardiac (n = 201, 20.6%) divisions. Overall, 658 patients (67.3%) had high satisfaction and 733 (74.9%) gave definite hospital recommendations. Hospital satisfaction was positively associated with an intensive care unit admission (odds ratio [OR] = 1.64, confidence interval [CI]: 1.20-2.23, P = 0.002) and satisfaction with provider and pain domains. Factors associated with decreased satisfaction were race (non-black minority compared with whites; OR = 0.41, CI: 0.21-0.83, P = 0.012), self-reported poor health (OR = 0.43, CI: 0.27-0.68, P < 0.001), ≥ 2 floor transfers (OR = 0.50, CI: 0.25-0.99, P = 0.046), and postoperative complications (OR = 0.67, CI: 0.55-0.82, P < 0.0001). In addition, weekend discharge (OR = 1.76, CI: 1.02-3.02, P = 0.041) was associated with hospital recommendation.
Clinical course, particularly complications, impacts patient satisfaction. However, more important than what happens is how it happens, as evidenced by the much greater influence of surgeon and nurse-patient interactions. These results help inform future quality improvement and resource allocation.
医院医疗服务提供者及系统消费者评估(HCAHPS)调查评分正式承认患者是医疗保健的核心,将质量指标从医生视角转向患者视角。本研究描述了手术患者满意度的临床预测因素。
对2011年3月至2012年10月期间单一机构外科的HCAHPS调查回复进行分析。终点是两个总体领域的最高满意度。采用多变量回归确定满意度预测因素,包括HCAHPS领域、人口统计学特征以及合并症、重症监护病房住院时间、急诊病例、出院日、楼层转科、并发症和辅助操作等临床变量。
共评估了978份调查问卷,代表急性护理和/或创伤科(n = 177,18.1%)、胸外科(n = 169,17.3%)、结直肠外科(n = 107,10.9%)、移植科(n = 95,9.7%)、血管外科(n = 92,9.4%)、肿瘤科(n = 88,9.0%)、整形科(n = 49,5.0%)和心脏科(n = 201,20.6%)的住院患者。总体而言,658名患者(67.3%)满意度高,733名患者(74.9%)明确推荐该医院。医院满意度与入住重症监护病房呈正相关(优势比[OR] = 1.64,置信区间[CI]:1.20 - 2.23,P = 0.002)以及对医疗服务提供者和疼痛领域的满意度相关。与满意度降低相关的因素包括种族(非黑人少数族裔与白人相比;OR = 0.41,CI:0.21 - 0.83,P = 0.012)、自我报告健康状况差(OR = 0.43,CI:0.27 - 0.68,P < 0.001)、≥2次楼层转科(OR = 0.50,CI:0.25 - 0.99,P = 0.046)和术后并发症(OR = 0.67,CI:0.55 - 0.82,P < 0.0001)。此外,周末出院(OR = 1.76,CI:1.02 - 3.02,P = 0.041)与医院推荐相关。
临床过程,尤其是并发症,会影响患者满意度。然而,比发生了什么更重要的是如何发生的,外科医生与护士和患者的互动影响更大就证明了这一点。这些结果有助于为未来的质量改进和资源分配提供参考。