• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冷刀锥切术和转化区大环形切除术显著增加自然早产风险:一项基于人群的队列研究。

Cold-knife conisation and large loop excision of transformation zone significantly increase the risk for spontaneous preterm birth: a population-based cohort study.

作者信息

Jančar Nina, Mihevc Ponikvar Barbara, Tomšič Sonja

机构信息

Department of Human Reproduction, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Health Survey and Health Promotion Department, National Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Aug;203:245-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.06.005
PMID:27359080
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to explore the association between cold-knife conisation and large loop excision of transformation zone (LLETZ) with spontaneous preterm birth in a large 10-year national sample. We wanted to explore further the association of these procedures with preterm birth according to gestation.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a population based retrospective cohort study, using data from national Medical Birth Registry. The study population consisted of all women giving birth to singletons in the period 2003-2012 in Slovenia, excluding all induced labors and elective cesarean sections before 37 weeks of gestation (N=192730). We compared the prevalence of spontaneous preterm births (before 28 weeks, before 32 weeks, before 34 weeks and before 37 weeks of gestation) in women with cold-knife conisation or LLETZ compared to women without history of conisation, calculating odds ratios (OR), adjusted for potential confounders. Chi-square test was used for descriptive analysis. Logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate crude odds ratio (OR) and adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) with two-sided probability (p) values.

RESULTS

A total of 8420 (4.4%) women had a preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation, 2250 (1.2%) before 34 weeks of gestation, 1333 (0.7%) before 32 weeks of gestation and 603 (0.3%) before 28 weeks of gestation. A total of 4580 (2.4%) women had some type of conisation in their medical history: 2083 (1.1%) had cold-knife conisation and 2498 (1.3%) had LLETZ. In women with history of cold-knife conisation, the adjusted OR for preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation was 3.13 (95% CI; 2.74-3.57) and for preterm birth before 28 weeks of gestation 5.96 (95% CI; 4.3-8.3). In women with history of LLETZ, the adjusted OR was 1.95 (95% CI; 1.68-2.25) and 2.88 (95% CI; 1.87-4.43), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with cervical excision procedure of any kind have significantly increased odds for preterm birth, especially for preterm birth before 28 weeks and before 32 weeks of gestation.

摘要

目的

我们的目标是在一个为期10年的全国性大样本中,探究冷刀锥切术和转化区大环形切除术(LLETZ)与自然早产之间的关联。我们想根据孕周进一步探究这些手术与早产之间的关联。

研究设计

我们利用国家医疗出生登记处的数据进行了一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。研究人群包括2003年至2012年期间在斯洛文尼亚生育单胎的所有女性,排除所有妊娠37周前的引产和择期剖宫产(N = 192730)。我们比较了有冷刀锥切术或LLETZ的女性与无锥切术史的女性中自然早产(妊娠28周前、32周前、34周前和37周前)的发生率,计算优势比(OR),并对潜在混杂因素进行调整。采用卡方检验进行描述性分析。进行逻辑回归分析以估计粗优势比(OR)和调整优势比(aOR)及其95%置信区间(95%CI)以及双侧概率(p)值。

结果

共有8420名(4.4%)女性在妊娠37周前早产,2250名(1.2%)在妊娠34周前早产,1333名(0.7%)在妊娠32周前早产,603名(0.3%)在妊娠28周前早产。共有4580名(2.4%)女性有某种锥切术史:2083名(1.1%)有冷刀锥切术,2498名(1.3%)有LLETZ。有冷刀锥切术史的女性中,妊娠37周前早产的调整OR为3.13(95%CI:2.74 - 3.57),妊娠28周前早产的调整OR为5.96(95%CI:4.3 - 8.3)。有LLETZ史的女性中,调整OR分别为1.95(95%CI:1.68 - 2.25)和2.88(95%CI:1.87 - 4.43)。

结论

任何类型宫颈切除术的女性早产几率显著增加,尤其是妊娠28周前和32周前的早产。

相似文献

1
Cold-knife conisation and large loop excision of transformation zone significantly increase the risk for spontaneous preterm birth: a population-based cohort study.冷刀锥切术和转化区大环形切除术显著增加自然早产风险:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Aug;203:245-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
2
Sequential cervical length screening in pregnancies after loop excision of the transformation zone conisation: a retrospective analysis.经阴道环形电切术(loop excision of the transformation zone,LLETZ)锥切术后妊娠的序贯宫颈长度筛查:一项回顾性分析。
BJOG. 2014 Mar;121(4):457-62. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12390. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
3
Comparative effectiveness and risk of preterm birth of local treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and stage IA1 cervical cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.局部治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变和 IA1 期宫颈癌的早产比较效果和风险:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Aug;23(8):1097-1108. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00334-5. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
4
Effects of cervical conisation on pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis.宫颈锥切术对妊娠结局的影响:一项荟萃分析
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Jan;39(1):74-81. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1463206. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
5
After conisation of the cervix, the perinatal mortality as a result of preterm delivery increases in subsequent pregnancy.宫颈锥切术后,后续妊娠因早产导致围产儿死亡率增加。
BJOG. 2010 Feb;117(3):258-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02438.x. Epub 2009 Nov 26.
6
Transvaginal ultrasonography in the prediction of preterm birth after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.经阴道超声检查在宫颈上皮内瘤变治疗后早产预测中的应用
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jan;107(1):37-44. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000192169.44775.76.
7
Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis.根据锥形切除深度对宫颈浸润前和早期浸润性疾病进行局部治疗后的不良产科结局:系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ. 2016 Jul 28;354:i3633. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3633.
8
Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial lesions and early invasive disease.宫颈上皮内瘤变和早期浸润性疾病保守治疗后的产科结局。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 2;11(11):CD012847. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012847.
9
Cervical conisation and the risk of preterm delivery: a retrospective matched pair analysis of a German cohort.宫颈锥切术与早产风险:一项德国队列的回顾性配对分析
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Mar;291(3):599-603. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3463-6. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
10
Pregnancy outcome in women before and after cervical conisation: population based cohort study.宫颈锥切术前后女性的妊娠结局:基于人群的队列研究
BMJ. 2008 Sep 18;337:a1343. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1343.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Liquid-Based Cytology and High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Testing With Partial Genotyping in Cervical Screening of Women Below 30 Years Old.液基细胞学与高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测及部分基因分型在30岁以下女性宫颈筛查中的临床疗效比较
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251336414. doi: 10.1177/10732748251336414. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
2
Factors affecting children's HPV vaccination in Austria: Evidence from a parent survey.影响奥地利儿童 HPV 疫苗接种的因素:来自家长调查的证据。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Nov 30;18(6):2126251. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2126251. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
3
Comparison of Conservative Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions with Imiquimod with Standard Excisional Technique Using LLETZ: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
咪喹莫特与使用大环状电切术(LLETZ)的标准切除技术对宫颈上皮内瘤变进行保守治疗的比较:一项随机对照试验
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 10;10(24):5777. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245777.
4
Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and the risk of spontaneous preterm birth: A Dutch population-based cohort study with 45,259 pregnancy outcomes.宫颈上皮内瘤变与自发性早产风险:一项基于人群的荷兰队列研究,共纳入 45259 例妊娠结局。
PLoS Med. 2021 Jun 4;18(6):e1003665. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003665. eCollection 2021 Jun.
5
Is IVF/ICSI [corrected] an Independent Risk Factor for Spontaneous Preterm Birth in Singletons? A Population-Based Cohort Study.体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射是否是单胎自发性早产的独立危险因素?一项基于人群的队列研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Dec 30;2018:7124362. doi: 10.1155/2018/7124362. eCollection 2018.
6
Cervical Cancer Screening Programs in Europe: The Transition Towards HPV Vaccination and Population-Based HPV Testing.欧洲的宫颈癌筛查项目:向 HPV 疫苗接种和基于人群的 HPV 检测的转变。
Viruses. 2018 Dec 19;10(12):729. doi: 10.3390/v10120729.
7
Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial lesions and early invasive disease.宫颈上皮内瘤变和早期浸润性疾病保守治疗后的产科结局。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 2;11(11):CD012847. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012847.