Degen Ryan M, Coleman Nathan W, Chang Brenda, Tetreault Danielle, Mahony Gregory T, Williams Riley J
Department of Sports Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
J Knee Surg. 2017 Mar;30(3):244-251. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1584534. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
Osteochondral lesions of the distal femur represent a challenging clinical entity, particularly in patients > 40 years of age. Microfracture has demonstrated inferior results in this population with clinical deterioration beyond 1 to 2 years postoperatively. Limited evidence exists to support alternative cartilage restoration procedures. The purpose of this study was to report functional outcomes and activity levels following cartilage restoration procedures in patients > 40 years with symptomatic distal femoral osteochondral lesions. From 2000 to 2012, 61 patients with distal femoral osteochondral injuries were retrospectively identified. Mean follow-up was 3.6 ± 1.4 years; mean age was 51.6 years (range 40-71); 59% were male. Of 61 patients, 35 patients (57%) were treated with synthetic scaffold (SS) plugs (off-label), 14 (23%) with osteochondral allograft (OCA), and 12 (20%) with autologous osteochondral transfer (AOT). Validated outcome measures including activity of daily living (ADL) score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective evaluation form, and Marx activity scale (MAS) were used. The average lesion size was 3.8 ± 2.1 cm. Lesion size was significantly greater in the OCA group (5.8 ± 1.8 cm), compared with the SS (3.2 ± 1.9 cm) and AOT group (3.3 ± 1.8 cm, ≤ 0.0024). Collectively, outcome scores for the entire population demonstrated significant improvement in ADL (61.36 ± 17.76-76.81 ± 17.2, < 0.0001) and IKDC scores (40.28 ± 13.28-61.84 ± 20.83, < 0.001) from baseline to final follow-up, with no significant change in MAS (4.19 ± 5.13-2.59 ± 3.92, = 0.07). Similarly, subgroup analysis identified that all treatment groups (SS, OCA, and AOT) demonstrated significant improvement in ADL and IKDC scores from preoperative to final postoperative visit ( ≤ 0.0361). MAS scores were maintained in the OCA and AOT groups ( ≥ 0.1704), but significantly decreased in the SS group (4.3 ± 5.2-2.7 ± 4.11, = 0.0163). Ten patients (16.3%) required revision surgery at a mean of 4.4 years (range 0.3-13.4 years). Cartilage restoration procedures using structural grafts are successful in patients 40 years and older, with improved pain and functional outcome scores compared with preoperative baseline scores. OCA and AOT should primarily be used, given recent concerns with SS implants.
股骨远端骨软骨损伤是一种具有挑战性的临床病症,对于年龄大于40岁的患者尤其如此。微骨折术在该人群中显示出较差的效果,术后1至2年临床症状会恶化。支持替代性软骨修复手术的证据有限。本研究的目的是报告年龄大于40岁且有症状的股骨远端骨软骨损伤患者接受软骨修复手术后的功能结果和活动水平。2000年至2012年,对61例股骨远端骨软骨损伤患者进行了回顾性研究。平均随访时间为3.6±1.4年;平均年龄为51.6岁(范围40 - 71岁);59%为男性。61例患者中,35例(57%)接受了合成支架(SS)填充(非标准使用)治疗,14例(23%)接受了异体骨软骨移植(OCA)治疗,12例(20%)接受了自体骨软骨移植(AOT)治疗。采用了经过验证的结果测量指标,包括日常生活活动(ADL)评分、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)主观评估表和马克思活动量表(MAS)。平均损伤大小为3.8±2.1厘米。与SS组(3.2±1.9厘米)和AOT组(3.3±1.8厘米,P≤0.0024)相比,OCA组的损伤大小显著更大(5.8±1.8厘米)。总体而言,整个人群的结果评分显示,从基线到最终随访,ADL评分(61.36±17.76 - 76.81±17.2,P<0.0001)和IKDC评分(40.28±13.28 - 61.84±20.83,P<0.001)有显著改善,而MAS评分无显著变化(4.19±5.13 - 2.59±3.92,P = 0.07)。同样,亚组分析表明,所有治疗组(SS、OCA和AOT)从术前到术后最终随访的ADL和IKDC评分均有显著改善(P≤0.0361)。OCA组和AOT组的MAS评分保持稳定(P≥0.1704),但SS组显著降低(4.3±5.2 - 2.7±4.11,P = 0.0163)。10例患者(16.3%)平均在4.4年(范围0.3 - 13.4年)时需要进行翻修手术。对于40岁及以上的患者,使用结构性移植物的软骨修复手术是成功的,与术前基线评分相比,疼痛和功能结果评分有所改善。鉴于最近对SS植入物的担忧,应优先使用OCA和AOT。