Suppr超能文献

肝门部胆管良恶性狭窄的鉴别

Differentiation of benign and malignant hilar bile duct stenosis.

作者信息

Liu Xiaolei, Yang Zhiying, Tan Haidong, Shao Chen, Liu Liguo, Si Shuang, Xu Li, Sun Yongliang

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2016 Jun 15;203(2):275-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Mar 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Failure to differentiate benign and malignant hilar bile duct stenosis may lead to inappropriate treatment. We retrospectively analyzed the methods for differentiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 53 patients with hilar bile duct stenosis were included, comprising 41 malignant cases (hilar cholangiocarcinoma) and 12 benign cases (six primary sclerosing cholangitis and six IgG4-associated sclerosing cholangitis). Data of clinical histories, laboratory tests, imaging studies, and liver pathologies were collected, and comparison was made between benign and malignant groups.

RESULTS

Compared with malignant group, patients in the benign group were more likely to have multiorgan involvement of clinical histories (P < 0.001). There was no difference on bilirubin, liver enzyme, and serum tumor marker between the two groups, whereas serum IgG4 levels were higher in the benign group (P = 0.003). Patients in the benign group were more likely to have pancreatic changes (P < 0.001) and multiple-segmental bile duct stenosis (P < 0.001) on imaging. Compared with the malignant group, patients in the benign group were more likely to show severe periportal inflammation in noninvolved liver (P < 0.001), fibrosis around intrahepatic bile duct (P < 0.001), and more IgG4-positive plasma cells (P < 0.001) on liver pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

Benign lesion should be considered for patients with history of multiorgan involvement, pancreas changes, or multiple-segmental bile duct stenosis on imaging. Liver biopsy could be helpful for differential diagnosis before surgery.

摘要

背景

无法区分肝门部胆管良性和恶性狭窄可能导致不恰当的治疗。我们回顾性分析了鉴别方法。

材料与方法

共纳入53例肝门部胆管狭窄患者,其中恶性病例41例(肝门部胆管癌),良性病例12例(6例原发性硬化性胆管炎和6例IgG4相关性硬化性胆管炎)。收集临床病史、实验室检查、影像学检查及肝脏病理数据,并对良性和恶性组进行比较。

结果

与恶性组相比,良性组患者临床病史更易出现多器官受累(P<0.001)。两组间胆红素、肝酶及血清肿瘤标志物无差异,而良性组血清IgG4水平较高(P=0.003)。良性组患者影像学上更易出现胰腺改变(P<0.001)和多节段胆管狭窄(P<0.001)。与恶性组相比,良性组患者肝脏病理显示非受累肝脏门周重度炎症(P<0.001)、肝内胆管周围纤维化(P<0.001)及更多IgG4阳性浆细胞(P<0.001)。

结论

对于有多器官受累病史、影像学上有胰腺改变或多节段胆管狭窄的患者,应考虑良性病变。肝活检有助于术前鉴别诊断。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验