Suppr超能文献

心房颤动患者行房室结射频导管消融术并植入永久性心室起搏器后的死亡率:一项对照非随机研究的结果

Mortality After Atrioventricular Nodal Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation With Permanent Ventricular Pacing in Atrial Fibrillation: Outcomes From a Controlled Nonrandomized Study.

作者信息

Garcia Bruno, Clementy Nicolas, Benhenda Nazih, Pierre Bertrand, Babuty Dominique, Olshansky Brian, Fauchier Laurent

机构信息

From the Service de Cardiologie, Pôle Cœur Thorax Vasculaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau et Faculté de Médecine, Université François Rabelais, Tours, France (B.G., N.C., N.B., B.P., D.B., L.F.); and Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Electrophysiology, Mercy Hospital-North Iowa, Mason City, IA (B.O.).

出版信息

Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016 Jul;9(7). doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.003993.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Atrioventricular nodal radiofrequency ablation (AVNA) with permanent ventricular pacing can be used to control rate in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, long-term outcomes after AVNA are uncertain, especially in light of irreversible pacemaker dependence.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We examined 9122 consecutive patients with AF. The outcomes in 453 patients with AVNA (26% of whom underwent an implantable cardiac defibrillator implant and 37% underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy implant) were compared with AF patients without AVNA after propensity score 1:1 matching. During follow-up in the propensity-matched cohort (2.41±3.23 years, median 1.23, quartiles 0.33-3.12), 100 patients died (yearly rate of death 6.6%). Mode of death was available in 86% of patients, which was cardiovascular in 67% of the patients (related to heart failure in 38%, sudden death in 5%, and other cardiovascular reason in 24%) and noncardiovascular in 33%. AVNA in patients with AF was associated with a lower risk of mortality (odds ratio 0.47, 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.77; P=0.003), a lower risk of cardiovascular mortality (odds ratio =0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.23-0.73; P=0.003), and nonsignificant lower risk of stroke and thromboembolic events (odds ratio =0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.36-1.06; P=0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

In sick AF patients with multiple comorbidities, AVNA with permanent ventricular pacing for rate control seems safe during follow-up and may be associated with lower mortality.

摘要

背景

房室结射频消融术(AVNA)联合永久性心室起搏可用于控制心房颤动(AF)患者的心率。然而,AVNA术后的长期预后尚不确定,尤其是考虑到不可逆转的起搏器依赖。

方法与结果

我们对9122例连续性AF患者进行了研究。在倾向评分1:1匹配后,将453例接受AVNA的患者(其中26%植入了植入式心脏除颤器,37%接受了心脏再同步治疗植入)的预后与未接受AVNA的AF患者进行比较。在倾向匹配队列的随访期间(2.41±3.23年,中位数1.23,四分位数0.33 - 3.12),100例患者死亡(年死亡率6.6%)。86%的患者有死亡方式记录,其中67%为心血管原因(38%与心力衰竭相关,5%为猝死,24%为其他心血管原因),33%为非心血管原因。AF患者接受AVNA与较低的死亡风险相关(比值比0.47,95%置信区间0.29 - 0.77;P = 0.003),较低的心血管死亡风险(比值比 = 0.41,95%置信区间0.23 - 0.73;P = 0.003),以及较低但无统计学意义的中风和血栓栓塞事件风险(比值比 = 0.61,95%置信区间0.36 - 1.06;P = 0.08)。

结论

在合并多种疾病的重症AF患者中,AVNA联合永久性心室起搏进行心率控制在随访期间似乎是安全的,并且可能与较低的死亡率相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验