Suppr超能文献

心房颤动合并心力衰竭患者房室结消融联合永久性希氏-浦肯野传导系统起搏的综述

Review of Atrioventricular Node Ablation Combined with Permanent His-Purkinje Conduction System Pacing in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation with Heart Failure.

作者信息

Wang Lina, Tan Chen, Lei Jingshu, Lee Chongyou

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Early Prediction and Intervention of Acute Myocardial Infarction, Peking University People's Hospital, 100035 Beijing, China.

Department of Cardiology, Hebei Yanda Hospital, 065201 Langfang, Hebei, China.

出版信息

Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Sep 5;25(9):312. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2509312. eCollection 2024 Sep.

Abstract

With the advancement of pacing technologies, His-Purkinje conduction system pacing (HPCSP) has been increasingly recognized as superior to conventional right ventricular pacing (RVP) and biventricular pacing (BVP). This method is characterized by a series of strategies that either strengthen the native cardiac conduction system or fully preserve physical atrioventricular activation, ensuring optimal clinical outcomes. Treatment with HPCSP is divided into two pacing categories, His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP), and when combined with atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA), can significantly improve left ventricular (LV) function. It effectively prevents tachycardia and regulates ventricular rates, demonstrating its efficacy and safety across different QRS wave complex durations. Therefore, HPCSP combined with AVNA can alleviate symptoms and improve the quality of life in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) who are unresponsive to multiple radiofrequency ablation, particularly those with concomitant heart failure (HF) who are at risk of further deterioration. As a result, this "pace and ablate" strategy could become a first-line treatment for refractory AF. As a pacing modality, HBP faces challenges in achieving precise localization and tends to increase the pacing threshold. Thus, LBBP has emerged as a novel approach within HPCSP, offering lower thresholds, higher sensing amplitudes, and improved success rates, potentially making it a preferable alternative to HBP. Future large-scale, prospective, and randomized controlled studies are needed to evaluate patient selection and implantation technology, aiming to clarify the differential clinical outcomes between pacing modalities.

摘要

随着起搏技术的进步,希氏-浦肯野传导系统起搏(HPCSP)已越来越被认为优于传统的右心室起搏(RVP)和双心室起搏(BVP)。这种方法的特点是采用一系列策略,要么强化心脏自身的传导系统,要么完全保留房室的生理性激动,以确保最佳的临床效果。HPCSP治疗分为两种起搏类型,即希氏束起搏(HBP)和左束支起搏(LBBP),与房室结消融(AVNA)联合使用时,可显著改善左心室(LV)功能。它能有效预防心动过速并调节心室率,在不同QRS波时限中均显示出其有效性和安全性。因此,HPCSP联合AVNA可缓解症状,提高对多次射频消融无反应的持续性心房颤动(AF)患者的生活质量,尤其是那些伴有心力衰竭(HF)且有进一步恶化风险的患者。因此,这种“起搏并消融”策略可能成为难治性AF的一线治疗方法。作为一种起搏方式,HBP在实现精确定位方面面临挑战,且往往会增加起搏阈值。因此,LBBP已成为HPCSP中的一种新方法,具有更低的阈值、更高的感知幅度和更高的成功率,可能使其成为比HBP更优的选择。未来需要开展大规模、前瞻性和随机对照研究来评估患者选择和植入技术,旨在阐明不同起搏方式之间的临床结局差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e68/11440395/b98130bbde67/2153-8174-25-9-312-g1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验