• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经动脉放射性栓塞术与化疗栓塞术治疗肝癌患者的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Transarterial radioembolization vs chemoembolization for hepatocarcinoma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Facciorusso Antonio, Serviddio Gaetano, Muscatiello Nicola

机构信息

Antonio Facciorusso, Nicola Muscatiello, Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, 71100 Foggia, Italy.

出版信息

World J Hepatol. 2016 Jun 28;8(18):770-8. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i18.770.

DOI:10.4254/wjh.v8.i18.770
PMID:27366304
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4921799/
Abstract

AIM

To compare the efficacy and safety of yttrium-90 radioembolization (Y90RE) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

METHODS

Bibliographic research was conducted on main scientific databases. When there was no statistically significant heterogeneity, pooled effects were calculated using a fixed-effects model by means of Mantel-Haenszel test, otherwise, a random-effects model was used with DerSimonian and Laird test. Summary estimates were expressed in terms of odds ratios (ORs) and 95%CI. The probability of publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and with Begg and Mazumdar's test. Sensitivity analysis was finally conducted using the method of excluding extreme data.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies were analyzed, of which 2 randomized controlled trials. Survival rate (SR) assessed at 1 year showed an absolute similarity between the two treatment groups (OR = 1.01, 95%CI: 0.78-1.31, P = 0.93). As long as time elapsed since the treatment, ORs for survival rate tended to significantly increase, thus meaning better long-term outcomes in patients who underwent Y90RE (2-year SR: OR = 1.43, 1.08-1.89, P = 0.01; 3-year SR: OR = 1.48, 1.03-2.13, P = 0.04). Meta-analysis of plotted hazard ratios (HRs) determined a non-significant overall estimate in favor of Y90RE (HR = 0.91, 0.80-1.04, P = 0.16). Y90RE showed a statistically significant benefit as compared to TACE in terms of higher progression-free survival rate assessed at 1 year (OR = 1.67; 95%CI: 1.10-2.55; P = 0.02). Pooled analyses do not revealed a statistically significant increase in OR for tumor objective responses after Y90RE with respect to TACE (OR = 1.22, 95%CI: 0.69-2.16, P = 0.50). A non-significant trend in favor of Y90RE was observed according to adverse event rate (OR = 0.70, 0.38-1.30, P = 0.26).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis reveals that Y90RE and TACE show similar effects in terms of survival, response rate and safety profile, although tumor progression is delayed after radioembolization.

摘要

目的

比较钇-90放射性栓塞(Y90RE)与经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)治疗肝细胞癌患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

在主要科学数据库进行文献研究。当不存在统计学显著异质性时,采用Mantel-Haenszel检验的固定效应模型计算合并效应,否则,采用DerSimonian和Laird检验的随机效应模型。汇总估计以比值比(OR)和95%置信区间表示。使用漏斗图以及Begg和Mazumdar检验评估发表偏倚的概率。最后采用排除极端数据的方法进行敏感性分析。

结果

共分析了10项研究,其中2项为随机对照试验。1年时评估的生存率(SR)显示两个治疗组之间绝对相似(OR = 1.01,95%CI:0.78 - 1.31,P = 0.93)。随着治疗后时间的推移,生存率的OR值倾向于显著增加,这意味着接受Y90RE治疗的患者长期预后更好(2年SR:OR = 1.43,1.08 - 1.89,P = 0.01;3年SR:OR = 1.48,1.03 - 2.13,P = 0.04)。绘制的风险比(HR)的荟萃分析确定总体估计无显著差异,倾向于Y90RE(HR = 0.91,0.80 - 1.04,P = 0.16)。与TACE相比,Y90RE在1年时评估的无进展生存率更高方面显示出统计学显著益处(OR = 1.67;95%CI:1.10 - 2.55;P = 0.02)。汇总分析未显示Y90RE相对于TACE后肿瘤客观反应的OR有统计学显著增加(OR = 1.22,95%CI:0.69 - 2.16,P = 0.50)。根据不良事件发生率观察到有利于Y90RE的无显著趋势(OR = 0.70,0.38 - 1.30,P = 0.26)。

结论

我们的荟萃分析表明,Y90RE和TACE在生存率、缓解率和安全性方面显示出相似的效果,尽管放射性栓塞后肿瘤进展有所延迟。

相似文献

1
Transarterial radioembolization vs chemoembolization for hepatocarcinoma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经动脉放射性栓塞术与化疗栓塞术治疗肝癌患者的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Hepatol. 2016 Jun 28;8(18):770-8. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i18.770.
2
Meta-analysis: adjusted indirect comparison of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization versus Y-radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.荟萃分析:药物洗脱微球经动脉化疗栓塞术与钇90放射性栓塞术治疗肝细胞癌的调整间接比较
Eur Radiol. 2017 May;27(5):2031-2041. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4548-3. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Meta-analysis of radiofrequency ablation in combination with transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.射频消融联合肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌的荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jun 28;19(24):3872-82. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i24.3872.
5
Transarterial chemoembolization vs bland embolization in hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.经动脉化疗栓塞术与单纯栓塞术治疗肝细胞癌的比较:随机试验的荟萃分析
United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Jun;5(4):511-518. doi: 10.1177/2050640616673516. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
6
Conventional transarterial chemoembolization vs microsphere embolization in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.肝细胞癌中传统经动脉化疗栓塞术与微球栓塞术的比较:一项荟萃分析
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 7;20(45):17206-17. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i45.17206.
7
Radiofrequency ablation vs radiation therapy vs transarterial chemoembolization vs yttrium 90 for local treatment of liver cancer - a systematic review and network meta-analysis of survival data.射频消融与放疗与经肝动脉化疗栓塞与钇 90 治疗肝癌的局部治疗-生存数据的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Acta Oncol. 2022 Apr;61(4):484-494. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2021.2009563. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
8
Transarterial chemoembolization versus hepatic resection in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment: a meta-analysis.经动脉化疗栓塞术与肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015 Aug 10;9:4431-40. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S86629. eCollection 2015.
9
Yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.钇-90经动脉放射性栓塞术与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗肝细胞癌患者的系统评价和荟萃分析
Cancer Biol Med. 2018 Aug;15(3):299-310. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2017.0177.
10
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with transarterial chemoembolization and transarterial chemoembolization alone in the treatment of liver cancer.高强度聚焦超声联合经动脉化疗栓塞与单纯经动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝癌的疗效和安全性的系统评价与Meta分析
Transl Cancer Res. 2022 Jun;11(6):1678-1688. doi: 10.21037/tcr-22-1094.

引用本文的文献

1
TACE Versus TARE in the Treatment of Liver-Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.经动脉化疗栓塞术与钇90微球选择性体内放射治疗在肝转移性乳腺癌治疗中的比较:一项系统评价
Tomography. 2025 Jul 12;11(7):81. doi: 10.3390/tomography11070081.
2
Transarterial Chemoembolization Outperforms Radioembolization in Early- and Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.经动脉化疗栓塞术在早期和中期肝细胞癌治疗中优于放射性栓塞术:一项多中心回顾性研究
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 7;17(13):2254. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132254.
3
Efficacy of Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经动脉化疗栓塞联合酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗肝细胞癌的疗效:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 24;17(13):2110. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132110.
4
Holmium-166 Radioembolization Is a Safe and Effective Locoregional Treatment for Primary and Secondary Liver Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.钬-166放射性栓塞术是一种治疗原发性和继发性肝肿瘤的安全有效的局部治疗方法:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 31;17(11):1841. doi: 10.3390/cancers17111841.
5
Model Predicting Survival in Intermediate-Stage HCC Patients Reclassified for TACE Based on the 2022 BCLC Criteria.基于2022年BCLC标准重新分类为经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)的中期肝癌患者生存预测模型
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 5;17(5):894. doi: 10.3390/cancers17050894.
6
Survival Outcomes Among Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Large Integrated US Health System.大型综合性美国医疗体系中肝细胞癌患者的生存结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2435066. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.35066.
7
Efficacy and Safety of Transarterial Radioembolization in Elderly Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Experience.经动脉放射性栓塞治疗老年肝细胞癌患者的疗效和安全性:单中心经验。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar;35(3):204-211. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2024.23155.
8
Y-/Ho- 'Radiation lobectomy' for liver tumors induces abnormal morphology and impaired drainage of peritumor lymphatics.用于肝肿瘤的“Y-/Ho-放射叶切除术”会导致肿瘤周围淋巴管形态异常及引流受损。
JHEP Rep. 2023 Dec 5;6(2):100981. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100981. eCollection 2024 Feb.
9
Combined Transarterial Chemoembolization and Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Infeasible for Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation: A Comparative Study with General Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation Outcomes.经动脉化疗栓塞联合射频消融治疗无法进行超声引导下经皮射频消融的肝细胞癌:与普通超声引导下射频消融结果的对比研究
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Oct 28;15(21):5193. doi: 10.3390/cancers15215193.
10
Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Role of Immunotherapy and Transplantation in the Era of Transplant Oncology.肝细胞癌:免疫疗法与移植在移植肿瘤学时代的作用
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Oct 24;15(21):5115. doi: 10.3390/cancers15215115.

本文引用的文献

1
Drug-eluting beads versus conventional chemoembolization for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.药物洗脱微球与传统化疗栓塞术治疗不可切除肝细胞癌的Meta分析
Dig Liver Dis. 2016 Jun;48(6):571-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Feb 21.
2
Microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.微波消融与射频消融治疗肝细胞癌的系统评价与Meta分析
Int J Hyperthermia. 2016 May;32(3):339-44. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2015.1127434. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
3
Drug-eluting beads versus conventional chemoembolization for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.药物洗脱微球与传统化疗栓塞术治疗不可切除肝细胞癌的对比
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Mar;31(3):645-53. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13147.
4
Transarterial chemoembolization: Evidences from the literature and applications in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.经动脉化疗栓塞术:来自文献的证据及其在肝细胞癌患者中的应用
World J Hepatol. 2015 Aug 8;7(16):2009-19. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i16.2009.
5
Is radioembolization ((90)Y) better than doxorubicin drug eluting beads (DEBDOX) for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis? A retrospective analysis.对于伴有门静脉血栓形成的肝细胞癌,放射性栓塞((90)Y)是否比阿霉素药物洗脱微球(DEBDOX)更好?一项回顾性分析。
Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep;24(3):270-5. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
6
Radioembolization of hepatocarcinoma with (90)Y glass microspheres: development of an individualized treatment planning strategy based on dosimetry and radiobiology.用(90)Y玻璃微球进行肝癌的放射性栓塞:基于剂量学和放射生物学制定个体化治疗计划策略
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Oct;42(11):1718-1738. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3068-8. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
7
Angiotensin receptor blockers improve survival outcomes after radiofrequency ablation in hepatocarcinoma patients.血管紧张素受体阻滞剂可改善肝癌患者射频消融术后的生存结局。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Nov;30(11):1643-50. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12988.
8
MEK 1/2 inhibitors in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.MEK 1/2抑制剂在肝细胞癌治疗中的应用
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jul;9(7):993-1003. doi: 10.1586/17474124.2015.1040763. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
9
Pilot randomized trial of selective internal radiation therapy vs. chemoembolization in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.不可切除肝细胞癌选择性内放射治疗与化疗栓塞的初步随机试验
Liver Int. 2015 Jun;35(6):1715-21. doi: 10.1111/liv.12750. Epub 2015 Jan 17.
10
Randomized comparison of selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) versus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.选择性内放射治疗(SIRT)与载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞术(DEB-TACE)治疗肝细胞癌的随机对照研究
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015 Apr;38(2):352-60. doi: 10.1007/s00270-014-1012-0. Epub 2014 Nov 7.