• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Transarterial Radioembolization in Elderly Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Experience.经动脉放射性栓塞治疗老年肝细胞癌患者的疗效和安全性:单中心经验。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar;35(3):204-211. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2024.23155.
2
Comparison of the survival and tolerability of radioembolization in elderly vs. younger patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.比较不可切除的肝细胞癌老年与年轻患者的放射性栓塞的生存和耐受性。
J Hepatol. 2013 Oct;59(4):753-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.05.025. Epub 2013 May 23.
3
Survival benefit of radioembolization for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma using yttrium-90 microspheres.使用钇-90微球进行放射性栓塞对不可切除肝细胞癌的生存获益。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Nov;29(11):1897-904. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12621.
4
The efficacy, safety, and predictors of outcomes of transarterial radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study.经动脉放射性栓塞治疗肝细胞癌的疗效、安全性及预后预测因素:一项回顾性研究
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jul;14(7):619-629. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2020.1777856. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
5
Transarterial radioembolization versus chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (TRACE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.经动脉放射性栓塞与化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌(TRACE):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2012 Aug 23;13:144. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-144.
6
Development of a prognostic score to predict response to Yttrium-90 radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion.开发一种预后评分,以预测伴有门静脉侵犯的肝细胞癌对钇-90 放射性栓塞治疗的反应。
J Hepatol. 2018 Apr;68(4):724-732. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.12.026. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
7
Cost effectiveness of radioembolization compared with conventional transarterial chemoembolization for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术相比,放射性栓塞术治疗肝细胞癌的成本效益。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Jul;25(7):1075-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.04.014. Epub 2014 May 24.
8
Safety and Efficacy of Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Segmental Transarterial Radioembolization.肝段动脉化疗栓塞术后行肝立体定向体部放疗治疗肝细胞癌的安全性和疗效。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Dec 1;105(5):968-976. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
9
Early treatment response evaluation after yttrium-90 radioembolization of liver malignancy with CT perfusion.利用CT灌注评估肝脏恶性肿瘤钇-90放射性栓塞后的早期治疗反应
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 May;25(5):747-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.01.025. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
10
Relationship of Tumor Radiation-absorbed Dose to Survival and Response in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Transarterial Radioembolization with Y in the SARAH Study.SARAH 研究中钇[90Y]放射性微球内放射栓塞治疗肝细胞癌的肿瘤吸收剂量与生存和反应的关系。
Radiology. 2020 Sep;296(3):673-684. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020191606. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic factors of elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: should we be more courageous in treatment?老年肝细胞癌患者的预后因素:我们在治疗中是否应该更勇敢?
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Sep 1;34(9):956-960. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002396. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
2
Impact of combined selective internal radiation therapy and sorafenib on survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.联合选择性内部放射治疗和索拉非尼对晚期肝细胞癌患者生存的影响。
J Hepatol. 2019 Dec;71(6):1164-1174. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.08.006. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
3
Efficacy and safety of selective internal radiotherapy versus sorafenib for intermediate-locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.选择性内放射治疗与索拉非尼治疗中局部进展期肝细胞癌的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Mar;13(3):271-279. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2019.1570135. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
4
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
5
Risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma by age, sex, and liver disorder status: A prospective cohort study in Korea.按年龄、性别和肝脏疾病状况分层的肝细胞癌风险因素:韩国一项前瞻性队列研究。
Cancer. 2018 Jul 1;124(13):2748-2757. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31406. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
6
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma.欧洲肝脏研究学会临床实践指南:肝细胞癌的管理
J Hepatol. 2018 Jul;69(1):182-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
7
SIRveNIB: Selective Internal Radiation Therapy Versus Sorafenib in Asia-Pacific Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.SIRveNIB:索拉非尼对比选择性内放射治疗在亚太地区肝细胞癌患者中的应用。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul 1;36(19):1913-1921. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.0892. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
8
Efficacy and safety of selective internal radiotherapy with yttrium-90 resin microspheres compared with sorafenib in locally advanced and inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (SARAH): an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial.钇[90Y]树脂微球选择性内放射治疗与索拉非尼治疗局部进展期不可切除肝细胞癌的疗效和安全性比较(SARAH):一项开放标签随机对照 3 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Dec;18(12):1624-1636. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30683-6. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
9
AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.美国肝病研究学会肝细胞癌治疗指南。
Hepatology. 2018 Jan;67(1):358-380. doi: 10.1002/hep.29086.
10
Transarterial radioembolization vs chemoembolization for hepatocarcinoma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经动脉放射性栓塞术与化疗栓塞术治疗肝癌患者的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Hepatol. 2016 Jun 28;8(18):770-8. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i18.770.

经动脉放射性栓塞治疗老年肝细胞癌患者的疗效和安全性:单中心经验。

Efficacy and Safety of Transarterial Radioembolization in Elderly Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Experience.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey.

Department of Medical Education, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk J Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar;35(3):204-211. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2024.23155.

DOI:10.5152/tjg.2024.23155
PMID:39128104
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11059000/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hepatocellular carcinoma is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in both cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients, and most patients are suitable for locoregional and/or systemic therapy at the time of diagnosis. In this study, we aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of transarterial radioembolization in elderly patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma between 2013 and 2022 were screened retrospectively. The patients were divided into 2 groups: the elderly (age >70 years) and the young (age <70 years). Transarterial radioembolization response was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were included in the young group, and 56 patients were in the elderly group. It was observed that male dominance was less in the elderly group (P > .05). Hepatitis B was the most common cause in both groups. There were no significant differences between groups with regard to morphological features of tumors [tumor focality (single; 62.2% and 60.7%, respectively) and maximal tumor diameter (6.9 and 6.55 cm, respectively)], transarterial radioembolization responses (51.1% and 39.3%, respectively), survival (9 and 8.5 months), and both early and late side effects (P > .05). Age was not found to be an effective factor in transarterial radioembolization response (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

No differences in the safety and efficacy of transarterial radioembolization were observed between the groups. In addition, it was observed that age was not a predictive factor for adverse events. In elderly patients in the frail group, it should be considered that age alone should not be seen as a limitation in the transarterial radioembolization decision.

摘要

背景/目的:肝细胞癌是肝硬化和非肝硬化患者死亡和发病的主要原因,大多数患者在诊断时适合接受局部区域和/或全身治疗。本研究旨在确定经动脉放射性栓塞治疗老年患者的疗效和安全性。

材料和方法

回顾性筛选了 2013 年至 2022 年间诊断为肝细胞癌的患者。患者分为两组:老年组(年龄>70 岁)和年轻组(年龄<70 岁)。根据实体瘤反应评估标准评估经动脉放射性栓塞治疗反应。

结果

年轻组 90 例,老年组 56 例。观察到老年组男性比例较低(P>0.05)。两组乙型肝炎均为最常见病因。两组肿瘤形态特征[肿瘤灶性(单发;分别为 62.2%和 60.7%)和最大肿瘤直径(分别为 6.9 和 6.55 cm)]、经动脉放射性栓塞治疗反应(分别为 51.1%和 39.3%)、生存率(9 个月和 8.5 个月)以及早期和晚期不良反应发生率之间均无显著差异(P>0.05)。年龄不是经动脉放射性栓塞治疗反应的有效因素(P>0.05)。

结论

两组经动脉放射性栓塞治疗的安全性和疗效无差异。此外,观察到年龄不是不良事件的预测因素。对于体弱的老年患者,应考虑到年龄本身不应成为经动脉放射性栓塞治疗决策的限制因素。