Payas Ayşe, Kaygusuz Kenan, Düger Cevdet, İsbir Ahmet Cemil, Kol İclal Özdemir, Gürsoy Sinan, Mimaroğlu Caner
Department of Anaesthesiology, Necip Fazıl State Hospital, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey.
Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey.
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2013 Dec;41(6):211-5. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2013.48. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of bispectral index (BIS) and neuromuscular blockade monitoring on the depth of anaesthesia and recovery in cardiac patients, scheduled to undergo open cholecystectomy operation with desflurane anaesthesia.
After the approval of the Ethics Committee and consent from the patients, patients were randomly divided into two groups. All patients received standard induction drugs, and 4-6% desflurane was used for maintenance of anaesthesia. In Group I, the anaesthesiologist was blind to BIS, and end-tidal volatile agent concentration (ETVAC) of desflurane was titrated according to the patients' hemodynamic changes. In Group II, ETVAC of desflurane was titrated to maintain BIS at 50-60. The hemodynamic data, BIS values, end-tidal volatile agent concentration (ETVAC) and train of four (TOF) values were recorded at pre-induction, post-induction, post-intubation, 1st and 5th minutes after surgical incision and then every 15 min. At the end of the operation, extubation time and the time to reach an Aldrete recovery score ≥9 were recorded in each group. Additionally, neuromuscular agent and narcotic agent doses were recorded.
The BIS values were lower for Group I in all times, except pre- and post-induction times (p<0.05). ETVAC values of all times were lower for Group II (p<0.05).
The requirement of volatile agent, which was given according to BIS monitoring, was lower than in the standard technique, but it is considered not to affect the early extubation, recovery and neuromuscular agent requirement dependent on TOF monitoring.
在本研究中,我们旨在调查双谱指数(BIS)和神经肌肉阻滞监测对计划接受地氟醚麻醉下行开腹胆囊切除术的心脏病患者麻醉深度和恢复情况的影响。
经伦理委员会批准并获得患者同意后,将患者随机分为两组。所有患者均接受标准诱导药物,并使用4 - 6%的地氟醚维持麻醉。在第一组中,麻醉医生对BIS值不知情,地氟醚的呼气末挥发性麻醉剂浓度(ETVAC)根据患者的血流动力学变化进行滴定。在第二组中,将地氟醚的ETVAC滴定至维持BIS值在50 - 60。在诱导前、诱导后、插管后、手术切口后第1分钟和第5分钟,然后每隔15分钟记录血流动力学数据、BIS值、呼气末挥发性麻醉剂浓度(ETVAC)和四个成串刺激(TOF)值。手术结束时,记录每组的拔管时间和达到Aldrete恢复评分≥9的时间。此外,记录神经肌肉阻滞剂和麻醉剂的剂量。
除诱导前和诱导后外,第一组在所有时间的BIS值均较低(p<0.05)。第二组在所有时间的ETVAC值均较低(p<0.05)。
根据BIS监测给予的挥发性麻醉剂需求量低于标准技术,但认为这不会影响早期拔管、恢复以及依赖TOF监测的神经肌肉阻滞剂需求量。