Yoldaş Hamit, Kocoğlu Hasan, Bayır Hakan, Yıldız İsa, Akkaya Akcan, Demirhan Abdullah, Tekelioğlu Ümit Yaşar
Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Abant İzzet Baysal University School of Medicine, Bolu, Turkey.
Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Pamukkale University School of Medicine, Denizli, Turkey.
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2016 Jun;44(3):142-8. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2016.04875. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
We aimed to evaluate the attitudes of doctors about cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in this research.
Overall, 234 doctors who were working in Abant İzzet Baysal University Health Research and Application Center and who accepted to participate in this research were included. Research data were obtained by a questionnaire containing questions about demographic characteristics of doctors and their knowledge about CPR. Questionnaires were applied between 27.02.2012 and 04.06.2012. The chi-square test was used for categorical variables. A value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
It was determined that 90% of the participants included in the study applied and/or observed CPR, and 62% of participants did not attend any CPR course. In addition, 64.1% of the doctors were found to be aware of guidelines prepared every 5 years. Although 65.2% of the doctors who attended a course previously gave a correct answer for the question about the number of cardiac compressions during adult CPR, 47.6% of the doctors who did not attend a course gave the correct answer (p=0.014). Additionally, 71.9% of participants who attended a course previously and 51.7% of participants who did not replied correctly to the question 'What should be done immediately after defibrillation during CPR?' And also the results for the question about how many joules is necessary to begin defibrillation with a monophasic defibrillator were statistically significant according to the attendance for a CPR course (p<0.005).
In this study, we have identified the lack of knowledge of the doctors about resuscitation.
在本研究中,我们旨在评估医生对心肺复苏(CPR)的态度。
总共纳入了234名在阿班特·伊泽特·贝萨尔大学健康研究与应用中心工作且同意参与本研究的医生。研究数据通过一份问卷获得,该问卷包含有关医生人口统计学特征及其心肺复苏知识的问题。问卷于2012年2月27日至2012年6月4日期间发放。卡方检验用于分类变量。p<0.05的值被认为具有统计学意义。
确定纳入研究的参与者中有90%进行过和/或观察过心肺复苏,62%的参与者未参加过任何心肺复苏课程。此外,发现64.1%的医生知晓每5年制定一次的指南。虽然之前参加过课程的医生中有65.2%对成人心肺复苏期间心脏按压次数的问题给出了正确答案,但未参加过课程的医生中有47.6%给出了正确答案(p = 0.014)。此外,之前参加过课程的参与者中有71.9%,未参加过课程的参与者中有51.7%对“心肺复苏期间除颤后应立即做什么?”这个问题回答正确。并且,根据是否参加心肺复苏课程,关于使用单相除颤器开始除颤需要多少焦耳的问题结果也具有统计学意义(p<0.005)。
在本研究中,我们发现医生在复苏知识方面存在欠缺。