Suppr超能文献

社交微笑对称性的三维评估。

Three-dimensional evaluation of social smile symmetry.

作者信息

Duran Gökhan S, Dindaroğlu Furkan, Görgülü Serkan

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2017 Jan;87(1):96-103. doi: 10.2319/020916-112.1. Epub 2016 Jul 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the social smile symmetry using three-dimensional (3D) stereophotogrammetric images.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted with 3D facial images of 30 individuals (age range 13-25 years). The rest position was considered as the reference image and the social smile image was aligned on this image using the best-fit alignment method. The spatial differences between the same points established on both images using 3D analyses were determined for right and left points in X, Y, and Z planes.

RESULTS

The highest difference related to spatial distance in right and left points was -0.56 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.19, 0.06 mm) between right and left commissure (Com) points. The difference was not significant, and the Bland-Altman upper and lower limits were -3.85 mm and 2.71 mm, respectively. The highest difference for the transversal plane was found in Com points, similarly to the spatial distance (mean: 0.50 mm, 95% CI, -2.62, 1.02 mm). The differences between the changes in the left and right points in the Y and Z plane were not significant (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The social smile was observed to show asymmetry in varying amounts in the different directions. Asymmetry increases in some cases, specifically for the corners of the mouth.

摘要

目的

使用三维(3D)立体摄影测量图像评估社交微笑的对称性。

材料与方法

本研究使用了30名个体(年龄范围13 - 25岁)的3D面部图像。将休息位图像视为参考图像,并使用最佳拟合对齐方法将社交微笑图像与此图像对齐。使用3D分析确定在两张图像上建立的相同点在X、Y和Z平面上左右点之间的空间差异。

结果

左右口角(Com)点之间与空间距离相关的最大差异为-0.56毫米(95%置信区间[CI],-1.19,0.06毫米)。差异不显著,Bland-Altman上下限分别为-3.85毫米和2.71毫米。与空间距离类似,横向平面上Com点的差异最大(平均值:0.50毫米,95% CI,-2.62,1.02毫米)。Y和Z平面上左右点变化之间的差异不显著(P > .05)。

结论

观察到社交微笑在不同方向上表现出不同程度的不对称。在某些情况下,不对称性会增加,特别是嘴角处。

相似文献

1
Three-dimensional evaluation of social smile symmetry.
Angle Orthod. 2017 Jan;87(1):96-103. doi: 10.2319/020916-112.1. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
3
Assessing Normal Smiling Function Through 3D-3D Surfaces Registration: An Innovative Method for the Assessment of Facial Mimicry.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Apr;42(2):456-463. doi: 10.1007/s00266-017-1028-3. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
4
Three-dimensional evaluation of social smile asymmetry in patients with unilateral impacted maxillary canine: a 3D stereophotogrammetry study.
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Nov;27(11):6915-6924. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05308-4. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
5
A new method for automatic tracking of facial landmarks in 3D motion captured images (4D).
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jan;42(1):9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.10.035. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
6
The Accuracy of Conformation of a Generic Surface Mesh for the Analysis of Facial Soft Tissue Changes.
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 19;11(4):e0152381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152381. eCollection 2016.
7
Three-dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry in patients with hemifacial microsomia using stereophotogrammetry.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Jan;47(1):179-184. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.11.011. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
8
Test-retest reliability of smile tasks using three-dimensional facial topography.
Angle Orthod. 2018 May;88(3):319-328. doi: 10.2319/062617-425.1. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
9
Quantitative analysis of normal smile with 3D stereophotogrammetry--an aid to facial reanimation.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Jan;63(1):65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.08.062. Epub 2008 Dec 18.
10

引用本文的文献

2
Three-dimensional evaluation of social smile asymmetry in patients with unilateral impacted maxillary canine: a 3D stereophotogrammetry study.
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Nov;27(11):6915-6924. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05308-4. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
3
Correlation of social smile symmetry with facial symmetry.
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Aug 14;23(1):572. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03260-z.
5
Evaluation of facial asymmetry by stereophotogrammetry in individuals with unilateral maxillary impacted canine.
J Orofac Orthop. 2021 Jul;82(4):226-235. doi: 10.1007/s00056-021-00285-3. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
8
Upper Lip Asymmetry During Smiling: An Analysis Using Three-Dimensional Images.
Turk J Orthod. 2018 Jun;31(2):32-36. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.17056.

本文引用的文献

1
Interactions of hard tissues, soft tissues, and growth over time, and their impact on orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Sep;148(3):380-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.04.030.
2
Accuracy and reliability of 3D stereophotogrammetry: A comparison to direct anthropometry and 2D photogrammetry.
Angle Orthod. 2016 May;86(3):487-94. doi: 10.2319/041415-244.1. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
3
Social smile reproducibility using 3-D stereophotogrammetry and reverse engineering technology.
Angle Orthod. 2016 May;86(3):448-55. doi: 10.2319/040915-236.1. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
4
The Impact of Orthognathic Surgery on Facial Expressions.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Dec;73(12):2380-90. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 May 18.
5
Perceptions of Duchenne and non-Duchenne smiles: A meta-analysis.
Cogn Emot. 2016;30(3):501-15. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1018817. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
6
Role of sagittal and oblique smiling profiles in evaluating facial esthetics.
J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Mar;26(2):532-6. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001279.
7
Photographic and videographic assessment of the smile: objective and subjective evaluations of posed and spontaneous smiles.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Dec;144(6):793-801. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.07.012.
8
Lip asymmetry and smile aesthetics.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2013 Nov;50(6):e111-4. doi: 10.1597/12-122. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
9
Combined 3-dimensional and mirror-image analysis for the diagnosis of asymmetry.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Dec;140(6):886-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.03.032.
10
From symmetry to asymmetry? The development of smile.
Cortex. 2012 Sep;48(8):1064-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.002. Epub 2011 Apr 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验