• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血液透析患者颈动脉内膜切除术的围手术期和长期结果。

Perioperative and Long-term Outcomes After Carotid Endarterectomy in Hemodialysis Patients.

机构信息

Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2016 Oct 1;151(10):947-952. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1504.

DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1504
PMID:27366897
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Early landmark trials excluding dialysis patients showed carotid endarterectomy (CEA) decreased stroke risk compared with medical management. Dialysis dependence has been associated with poor outcomes after CEA in small studies, but, to our knowledge, there are no large studies evaluating outcomes of CEA in this patient group.

OBJECTIVE

To delineate perioperative and long-term outcomes after CEA in dialysis-dependent patients in a large national database.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent CEA in the US Renal Disease System-Medicare-matched database between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2011, was performed in June 2015. The median follow-up time was 2.5 years. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate perioperative and long-term outcomes.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcomes of interest were perioperative stroke, myocardial infarction and mortality, and long-term stroke and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 5142 patients were studied; 83% of whom were asymptomatic. The mean (SD) age was 68.9 (9.6) years for asymptomatic patients and 70.0 (9.1) years for symptomatic patients. The 30-day stroke rate, myocardial infarction, and mortality for the asymptomatic and symptomatic groups were 2.7% vs 5.2% (P = .001), 4.6% vs 5.0% (P = .69), and 2.6% vs 2.9% (P = .61), respectively. Predictors of perioperative stroke were symptomatic status (odds ratio [OR], 2.01; 95% CI, 1.18-3.42; P = .01), black race (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.24-4.25; P = .008), and Hispanic ethnicity (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.17-4.42; P = .02). Freedom from stroke and overall survival were lower in symptomatic compared with asymptomatic patients at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years (in asymptomatic vs symptomatic patients, freedom from stroke rates were 92% vs 87% at 1 year, 88% vs 83% at 2 years, 84% vs 78% at 3 years, 80% vs 73% at 4 years, and 79% vs 69% at 5 years, respectively, and overall survival rates were 78% vs 73% at 1 year, 60% vs 57% at 2 years, 46% vs 42% at 3 years, 37% vs 32% at 4 years, and 33% vs 29% at 5 years; P < .05). Predictors of long-term stroke were preoperative symptoms (hazard ratio, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.24-2.24; P < .001), female sex (hazard ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.03-1.73; P = .04), and inability to ambulate (hazard ratio, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.25-2.62; P = .002). Predictors of long-term mortality were increasing age (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03; P < .01), active smoking (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.00-1.48; P = .045), history of congestive heart failure (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.12-1.39; P < .001), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.09-1.45; P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

To our knowledge, this is the largest study to date of dialysis patients who have undergone CEA. We have shown that the risks of CEA in asymptomatic patients is high and may outweigh the benefits. The risk of CEA in symptomatic patients is also high, and it should only be offered to a small carefully selected cohort of symptomatic patients.

摘要

重要性

早期的里程碑式试验排除了透析患者,表明颈动脉内膜切除术 (CEA) 降低了中风风险,优于药物治疗。在小型研究中,透析依赖与 CEA 后的不良结果相关,但据我们所知,尚无大型研究评估该患者群体中 CEA 的结果。

目的

在一个大型国家数据库中,描述透析依赖患者 CEA 的围手术期和长期结果。

设计、地点和参与者:对 2006 年 1 月 1 日至 2011 年 12 月 31 日期间在美国肾脏疾病系统-医疗保险匹配数据库中接受 CEA 的所有患者进行回顾性审查。中位随访时间为 2.5 年。使用逻辑和 Cox 回归分析评估围手术期和长期结果。

主要结局和措施

主要关注的结果是围手术期中风、心肌梗死和死亡率以及长期中风和死亡率。

结果

共研究了 5142 名患者,其中 83%为无症状。无症状患者的平均(SD)年龄为 68.9(9.6)岁,有症状患者的平均年龄为 70.0(9.1)岁。无症状和有症状组的 30 天中风率、心肌梗死率和死亡率分别为 2.7%比 5.2%(P<.001)、4.6%比 5.0%(P=.69)和 2.6%比 2.9%(P=.61)。围手术期中风的预测因素是症状状态(优势比 [OR],2.01;95%置信区间 [CI],1.18-3.42;P=.01)、黑种人(OR,2.30;95%CI,1.24-4.25;P=.008)和西班牙裔(OR,2.28;95%CI,1.17-4.42;P=.02)。与无症状患者相比,有症状患者在 1、2、3、4 和 5 年时的中风发生率和总体生存率均较低(在无症状患者与有症状患者中,1 年时无中风发生率分别为 92%和 87%,2 年时分别为 88%和 83%,3 年时分别为 84%和 78%,4 年时分别为 80%和 73%,5 年时分别为 79%和 69%,1 年时总体生存率分别为 78%和 73%,2 年时分别为 60%和 57%,3 年时分别为 46%和 42%,4 年时分别为 37%和 32%,5 年时分别为 33%和 29%;P<.05)。长期中风的预测因素是术前症状(风险比 [HR],1.67;95%CI,1.24-2.24;P<.001)、女性(HR,1.34;95%CI,1.03-1.73;P=.04)和无法行走(HR,1.81;95%CI,1.25-2.62;P=.002)。长期死亡率的预测因素是年龄增长(OR,1.02;95%CI,1.01-1.03;P<.01)、吸烟(OR,1.22;95%CI,1.00-1.48;P=.045)、充血性心力衰竭(OR,1.25;95%CI,1.12-1.39;P<.001)和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(OR,1.26;95%CI,1.09-1.45;P=.002)。

结论和相关性

据我们所知,这是迄今为止关于接受 CEA 的透析患者的最大研究。我们表明,无症状患者 CEA 的风险很高,可能超过了获益。有症状患者 CEA 的风险也很高,只能为一小部分精心挑选的有症状患者提供。

相似文献

1
Perioperative and Long-term Outcomes After Carotid Endarterectomy in Hemodialysis Patients.血液透析患者颈动脉内膜切除术的围手术期和长期结果。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Oct 1;151(10):947-952. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1504.
2
Revascularization of asymptomatic carotid stenosis is not appropriate in patients on dialysis.对于正在接受透析治疗的患者,对无症状性颈动脉狭窄进行血管重建术并不合适。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Mar;61(3):670-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.10.002.
3
Survival and long-term cardiovascular outcomes after carotid endarterectomy in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.慢性肾功能不全患者行颈动脉内膜切除术后的生存情况及长期心血管结局
Ann Vasc Surg. 2015 Jan;29(1):15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2014.07.029. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
4
Carotid Revascularization in Asymptomatic Patients after Renal Transplantation.肾移植术后无症状患者的颈动脉血运重建术
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Jan;38:130-135. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
5
Predictors of poor outcome after carotid intervention.颈动脉介入术后不良预后的预测因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Sep;64(3):663-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.03.428. Epub 2016 May 18.
6
Perioperative and long-term impact of chronic kidney disease on carotid artery interventions.慢性肾脏病对颈动脉介入治疗的围手术期及长期影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Nov;64(5):1295-1302. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.04.038.
7
Preoperative Antiplatelet and Statin Use Does Not Affect Outcomes after Carotid Endarterectomy.术前使用抗血小板药物和他汀类药物不影响颈动脉内膜切除术的术后结果。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Jan;46:43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
8
Analysis of Florida and New York state hospital discharges suggests that carotid stenting in symptomatic women is associated with significant increase in mortality and perioperative morbidity compared with carotid endarterectomy.对佛罗里达州和纽约州医院出院患者的分析表明,与颈动脉内膜切除术相比,症状性女性颈动脉支架置入术与死亡率和围手术期发病率显著增加相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Aug;56(2):334-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.01.066. Epub 2012 May 12.
9
Long-term morbidity and mortality of carotid endarterectomy in patients with end-stage renal disease receiving hemodialysis.接受血液透析的终末期肾病患者行颈动脉内膜切除术的长期发病率和死亡率。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 Mar;23(3):545-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.05.012. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
10
Perioperative outcomes for carotid revascularization on asymptomatic dialysis-dependent patients meet Society for Vascular Society guidelines.无症状透析依赖患者颈动脉血运重建的围手术期结果符合血管外科学会指南。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jul;74(1):195-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.11.044. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a machine learning-based model for perioperative stroke prediction in noncardiac, nonvascular, and nonneurosurgical patients.基于机器学习的非心脏、非血管和非神经外科手术患者围手术期卒中预测模型的开发与验证
Front Physiol. 2025 Jun 20;16:1624898. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1624898. eCollection 2025.
2
Indications and Outcome of Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA): A Single Centre Experience.颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的适应症与结果:单中心经验
Cureus. 2023 Dec 21;15(12):e50930. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50930. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Carotid Endarterectomy Should Not Be Recommended to End-Stage Kidney Disease Patients with Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Disease.
颈动脉内膜切除术不推荐用于无症状颈动脉疾病的终末期肾病患者。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Apr;101:53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.08.031. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
4
Management of Patients with Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis May Need to Be Individualized: A Multidisciplinary Call for Action.无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者的管理可能需要个体化:多学科行动呼吁。
J Stroke. 2021 May;23(2):202-212. doi: 10.5853/jos.2020.04273. Epub 2021 May 31.
5
Perioperative Stroke.围手术期卒中。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2020 Apr 27;20(5):12. doi: 10.1007/s11910-020-01033-7.
6
Is Duplex carotid artery screening prior to CABG justified?冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)前进行双侧颈动脉筛查是否合理?
Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2019 Apr;24(2):122-129. doi: 10.17712/nsj.2019.2.20180022.
7
Risks Associated With Primary and Redo Carotid Endarterectomy in the Endovascular Era.血管内时代初次颈动脉内膜切除术和再次颈动脉内膜切除术的相关风险。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Mar 1;153(3):252-259. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4477.